Gene Wolfe and Patrick O'Brian

The Urth list — 7 messages, 5 voices, 08 Apr 2007
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4810

Nicholas Gevers08 Apr 2007, 07:45
I notice Bruce Trinque, noted Patrick O'Brian scholar and afficianado, has joined the Urth list. Welcome, Bruce! It'd be interesting to hear how you compare POB and GW... --Nick Gevers.
Nicholas Gevers08 Apr 2007, 07:45

↳ follows, by subject match Nicholas Gevers

I notice Bruce Trinque, noted Patrick O'Brian scholar and afficianado, has joined the Urth list. Welcome, Bruce! It'd be interesting to hear how you compare POB and GW... --Nick Gevers.
Andy Robertson08 Apr 2007, 10:07

↳ in reply to Nicholas Gevers

Nicholas Gevers writes:
6 quoted lines
I notice Bruce Trinque, noted Patrick O'Brian scholar and afficianado, has joined the Urth list. Welcome, Bruce! It'd be interesting to hear how you compare POB and GW... --Nick Gevers.
I suspect there is quite an overlap between the two fandoms. :-)
Martinus Scriblerus08 Apr 2007, 11:59

↳ in reply to Andy Robertson

8 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On 4/8/07, Andy Robertson <andywrobertson at clara.co.uk> wrote: Nicholas Gevers writes:
I notice Bruce Trinque, noted Patrick O'Brian scholar and afficianado, has joined the Urth list. Welcome, Bruce! It'd be interesting to hear how you compare POB and GW... --Nick Gevers.
I suspect there is quite an overlap between the two fandoms. :-)
There certainly is after Bruce mentioned Gene Wolfe on a POB mailing list recently.
Martinus Scriblerus scripsit ex 50? 21' N, 4?41' W
Recursive Loop08 Apr 2007, 12:08

↳ in reply to Martinus Scriblerus

So would this be a good time to mention on the Urth mailing list that a careful reading of "21", the final, uncompleted novel in the Aubrey-Maturin series mentions a strange figure with a glove with spikes? ;) Fred Kiesche (who has been on both lists for a while, but is not far enough on either to comment much)
Batrinque at aol.com08 Apr 2007, 12:52

↳ follows, by subject match Recursive Loop

In a message dated 4/8/2007 3:46:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, vermoulian at yahoo.com writes: I notice Bruce Trinque, noted Patrick O'Brian scholar and afficianado, has joined the Urth list. An aficionado, yes. A scholar, no. Welcome, Thank'ee, thank'ee. Now, over on the Patrick O'Brian list we keep around some grog to welcome new members. I don't suppose ... Bruce! It'd be interesting to hear how you compare POB and GW... I find the reading of them to be vastly different experiences. POB's prose sweeps me along, while that of GW demands my close, close attention, frequently stopping and going back to se what I had missed -- and ninety percent of the time I find that Wolfe is simply employing a narrative technique of plopping in new names and references to old incidents without laying in preparatory groundwork. I think that O'Brian adheres fairly closely to traditional narrative techniques, while of course Wolfe delights in experimenting with new ways to challenge his readers (not that O'Brian does not occasionally lay a trap for the unwary). I frequently listen to O'Brian novels as audiobooks while commuting; I cannot conceive of doing that with Wolfe (finding it necessary to go back and re-read). I have recently re-read the Short Sun trilogy, then took a break with a few history volumes, the read (for the first time) "The Knight", then another break, then "The Wizard", and now another break before I tackled "Soldier of Sidon" (I have read the first two Latro books some time ago and plan on browsing through them -- but not re-reading -- before I embark on the new one). I find these breaks between Wolfe novels to be necessary to avoid overload, while I can read one POB novel after another. Bruce Trinque Amston, CT
Andy Robertson08 Apr 2007, 16:33

↳ in reply to Recursive Loop

Recursive Loop writes:
1 quoted line
So would this be a good time to mention on the Urth mailing list that a careful reading of "21", the final, uncompleted novel in the Aubrey-Maturin series mentions a strange figure with a glove with spikes?
Um, what page????

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.