The poor Aelf The Urth list — 19 messages, 8 voices, 25 Sep 2007 https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4914 Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. ============================================================================== Roy C. Lackey — 25 Sep 2007, 21:33 I've probably said this before, but I'll say it again to drive home the point that the Neoplatonism-based theory of upward mobility in a hierarchical system doesn't apply to Wolfe's Seven Worlds cosmology in TWK. Having no souls, the Aelf are by definition amoral. Because they lack moral agency, they are constitutionally incapable of 'bettering' themselves by thought, word or deed. Even the abstract concept has no meaning for them. They can do nothing to raise themselves by their own moral bootstraps. They not only don't have the boots; they don't even have feet to put in them. They are nevertheless expected, by the religious principles stated in TWK, to worship the beings of the next-higher level, humans. If they do not act 'rightly', when they die they will cease to exist and turn back into the natural trash from whence they came. If they do 'right' and worship humans, they get to kiss human ass, and when they die they cease to exist and turn back into trash. Let's see; if I were an Aelf, which path should I take to the same end, oblivion? What incentive would I have to choose one path over the other, even assuming that I had the moral wherewithal to choose? Who would have the balls to upbraid me for not electing to brown-nose my way to oblivion? The Aelf are screwed, it's not their fault, and there is nothing they can do about it. And the dragons should worship this trash? -Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Matthew King — 25 Sep 2007, 22:17 in reply to Roy C. Lackey > On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:33 PM, Roy C. Lackey wrote: > The Aelf are screwed, it's not their fault, It's Kulili's fault, isn't it? > and there is nothing they can do > about it. And the dragons should worship this trash? The dragons should worship Kulili. I forget who was the driving power behind the war against Kulili, but everything else I remember makes me think it must have been Setr. Some of the Aelf would join in because Kulili is the one who created them from trash, to live as trash. Should the Aelf have worshipped Kulili? She was their creator. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stanislaus — 25 Sep 2007, 23:37 in reply to Roy C. Lackey Hello Roy, > Tuesday, September 25, 2007, 11:33:59 PM, you wrote: > I've probably said this before, but I'll say it again to drive home the > point that the Neoplatonism-based theory of upward mobility in a > hierarchical system doesn't apply to Wolfe's Seven Worlds cosmology in TWK. > Having no souls, the Aelf are by definition amoral. Because they lack moral > agency, they are constitutionally incapable of 'bettering' themselves by > thought, word or deed. Even the abstract concept has no meaning for them. > They can do nothing to raise themselves by their own moral bootstraps. They > not only don't have the boots; they don't even have feet to put in them. > They are nevertheless expected, by the religious principles stated in TWK, > to worship the beings of the next-higher level, humans. If they do not act > 'rightly', when they die they will cease to exist and turn back into the > natural trash from whence they came. If they do 'right' and worship humans, > they get to kiss human ass, and when they die they cease to exist and turn > back into trash. Let's see; if I were an Aelf, which path should I take to > the same end, oblivion? What incentive would I have to choose one path over > the other, even assuming that I had the moral wherewithal to choose? Who > would have the balls to upbraid me for not electing to brown-nose my way to > oblivion? > The Aelf are screwed, it's not their fault, and there is nothing they can do > about it. And the dragons should worship this trash? > -Roy Yes, since they are even worse. In the Neoplatonic system the return is open only to the creatures with immortal soul, of which the lowest are men. The rest is pure matter. I don't know whether Plotinus ever engaged in apocalyptics, but most similar systems (Stoics, Kabala) had a cyclical universe, periodically expanding from God, and then being destroyed and absorbed by him. So the Aelf can wait until the end of the world, when they will be destroyed in flame and absorbed by the One. And why worship those above them? Because those above are stronger. In the Neoplatonic system good equals strong. Everything good flows from the above - beauty, law and strength. By following the example from above Aelf will become as strong and as happy as it is possible for them - not very much, since they are trash. As I said, the Neoplatonic system doesn't incline towards any pity for those below. -- Best regards, Stanislaus mailto:sbocian at poczta.fm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pokaz innym kto tu rzadzi! Kliknij >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1bbc ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ thalassocrat at nym.hush.com — 25 Sep 2007, 23:46 follows, by subject match Stanislaus > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:17:53 +1000 Matthew King > wrote: > > The dragons should worship Kulili. I forget who was the driving > power behind the war against Kulili, but everything else I > remember > makes me think it must have been Setr. Actually, the Aelf first tried to defeat her on their own, and when that didn't work, they called in the dragons. They tried again, under Setr, and failed once more. I assume that Setr's goal in this was mainly to demoralize the Aelf further, and make them more amenable to his control - I doubt that he really expected them to win. > Some of the Aelf would join in because Kulili is the one who > created > them from trash, to live as trash. Should the Aelf have > worshipped > Kulili? She was their creator. In the Aelf's message to Arnthor (I think it's there) they say that the dragons are supposed to worship them, which is something I never really understood. On Ray's point about what the Aelf get from worshipping humans, I guess there's some kind of answer in Toug's healing of Uri (Baki?). But surely any "upwards" worship is really just a proxy for worhsip of the Most High God; this, I think, is made pretty clear at the end of Wizard. Humans can surely aspire to more than just an afterlife of carousing & fighting in the halls of the Valfather; it's obvious (to me, at any rate) that Able's eventual fate will be to reach the Empyrean. He hopes to speak of what Kulili showed him to "one higher than the Valfather"; Michael summons him to service with a lord who is surely higher than Skai. Etc etc. And I take Dsiri as a sign that Aelf can share in this as well. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Straight — 27 Sep 2007, 17:42 in reply to Roy C. Lackey > On 9/25/07, Roy C. Lackey wrote: > They are nevertheless expected, by the religious principles stated in TWK, > to worship the beings of the next-higher level, humans. If they do not act > 'rightly', when they die they will cease to exist and turn back into the > natural trash from whence they came. If they do 'right' and worship humans, > they get to kiss human ass, and when they die they cease to exist and turn > back into trash. Let's see; if I were an Aelf, which path should I take to > the same end, oblivion? What incentive would I have to choose one path over > the other, even assuming that I had the moral wherewithal to choose? Who > would have the balls to upbraid me for not electing to brown-nose my way to > oblivion? You seem to take the point of view that the purpose of worship is to flatter your way into a happy afterlife. I think the Neo-Platonic view is that the Aelf should worship humans because they'll be better off that way right now. That by refusing to worship and devote themselves to that which is higher and better, they just make themselves miserable and unfulfilled. It is an intrinsic rather than an extrinsic reward. Wolfe's critique of this worldview seems to be that beings at any level would be happier (in the Aristotelian sense) if they were to aim higher still. If humans were to set their aspirations, their ideals, their worship higher than the Valfather, they might achieve something greater than the knightly virtues. Rostrum ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chris — 27 Sep 2007, 18:16 in reply to Michael Straight > You seem to take the point of view that the purpose of worship is to > flatter your way into a happy afterlife. I think the Neo-Platonic > view is that the Aelf should worship humans because they'll be better > off that way right now. That by refusing to worship and devote > themselves to that which is higher and better, they just make > themselves miserable and unfulfilled. It is an intrinsic rather than > an extrinsic reward. > > Wolfe's critique of this worldview seems to be that beings at any > level would be happier (in the Aristotelian sense) if they were to aim > higher still. If humans were to set their aspirations, their ideals, > their worship higher than the Valfather, they might achieve something > greater than the knightly virtues. > > Rostrum I am not sure I can buy into the Wizard Knight as a treatise on metaphysics. I suppose this mixes up the macro/microcosm a bit, but I thought that what this inverted order was really supposed to illuminate was the glorification of our baser drives and desires within the individual. And particularly Able's worship of Disiri as a sort of glorification of Romantic love in all its more degenerate forms. Able has love, but it is fixated on all the wrong things and there is, at bottom, nothing (but garbage) once you're able to see through its surface glamour. The interesting twist is of course that Able is able (heh) to uplift this love to something genuine in the end. At least, I really hope that's what's going on there: that Disiri represents Able's inner love (or ideal thereof), and not the actual object of that love. I find the assumption that you can "redeem" someone, change their nature by sort of imposing your own will, quite patronizing and not necessarily a great idea (I keep thinking of Larry's attempt to "fix" that girl in The Razor's Edge). In any event I read WK on sort of a double level as a story in which the protagonist needs to not only overcome (and restore to their proper order in the soul) the darker instincts and desires that drive him, but also in a way reconcile himself to their existence - not to suppress them but to integrate and uplift them. I think you can see this process going on over the course of the books. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Roy C. Lackey — 27 Sep 2007, 19:47 follows, by subject match Chris > Rostrum quoted and wrote: > On 9/25/07, Roy C. Lackey wrote: > > They are nevertheless expected, by the religious principles stated in > > TWK, > > to worship the beings of the next-higher level, humans. If they do not > > act > > 'rightly', when they die they will cease to exist and turn back into the > > natural trash from whence they came. If they do 'right' and worship > > humans, > > they get to kiss human ass, and when they die they cease to exist and > > turn > > back into trash. Let's see; if I were an Aelf, which path should I take > > to > > the same end, oblivion? What incentive would I have to choose one path > > over > > the other, even assuming that I had the moral wherewithal to choose? Who > > would have the balls to upbraid me for not electing to brown-nose my way > > to > > oblivion? > You seem to take the point of view that the purpose of worship is to > flatter your way into a happy afterlife. I think the Neo-Platonic > view is that the Aelf should worship humans because they'll be better > off that way right now. That by refusing to worship and devote > themselves to that which is higher and better, they just make > themselves miserable and unfulfilled. It is an intrinsic rather than > an extrinsic reward. That might, in theory (Neo-Platonic or other system), be valid for humans -- I won't debate it because it is not germane to my argument. I argued that it was not true for the Aelf in TWK. The essence of my argument was in the paragraph immediately before the one you quoted. I won't cite dictionary definitions of "soul", "moral" or "worship", because I know you know them. My argument runs like this: Because the soul is the immortal arbiter (in religious theory) of behavior, any being that does not have a soul lacks the fundamental criterion for distinguishing the difference between 'right' and 'wrong' conduct, as such conduct is defined by any given moral system. In TWK, right conduct is defined, in part, as the worship by beings at a given level of the class of beings in the next higher level. It is a textual given that the Aelf have no souls, therefore they cannot be held accountable (morally) for their conduct, whether such conduct be worship or anything else. As I said, they are amoral. > Wolfe's critique of this worldview seems to be that beings at any > level would be happier (in the Aristotelian sense) if they were to aim > higher still. If humans were to set their aspirations, their ideals, > their worship higher than the Valfather, they might achieve something > greater than the knightly virtues. That might be true for humans, but where are such aspirations provided for in the text? Very few common people will even attain Skai, yet they are expected to worship the beings of Skai. If they can't reach the fifth level, what hope have they for achieving higher? I see no evidence of a campaign to circumvent the established rules of the game and appeal directly to the Top. -Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Straight — 28 Sep 2007, 18:07 in reply to Roy C. Lackey > On 9/27/07, Roy C. Lackey wrote: > Because the soul is the immortal arbiter (in religious theory) of behavior, > any being that does not have a soul lacks the fundamental criterion for > distinguishing the difference between 'right' and 'wrong' conduct, as such > conduct is defined by any given moral system. In TWK, right conduct is > defined, in part, as the worship by beings at a given level of the class of > beings in the next higher level. It is a textual given that the Aelf have no > souls, therefore they cannot be held accountable (morally) for their > conduct, whether such conduct be worship or anything else. As I said, they > are amoral. OK. But what I was saying is that advising the Aelf to worship the higher beings need not have a moral component. A dog might be better off living in obedience to a kind farmer than running wild and feral. We wouldn't think of the wild dog as evil, but we might think it wretched, and if we felt compassion for it, we might try to tame it. But to take a completely different tack, maybe we need to question this idea that the Aelf have no souls. How do we know that? Who told them that? In the Sun books, Wolfe is constantly giving us robots, animals, vampire leeches, etc. that people treat as soul-less, but turn out to show evidence of a soul. And in many of those cases, the souls seem somehow derived from contact with human beings. So maybe the truth is that the Aelf have no souls if they are untethered to the human beings above them through whom they would derive a soul? > That might be true for humans, but where are such aspirations provided for > in the text? Very few common people will even attain Skai, yet they are > expected to worship the beings of Skai. If they can't reach the fifth level, > what hope have they for achieving higher? I see no evidence of a campaign to > circumvent the established rules of the game and appeal directly to the Top. I thought that was the implication of Able being visited by Michael. That Able is being called to aspire higher than Skai, and perhaps lead others higher as well. Rostrum ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Straight — 28 Sep 2007, 18:16 in reply to Chris > On 9/27/07, Chris wrote: > I am not sure I can buy into the Wizard Knight as a treatise on metaphysics. I don't think it is either. I was trying to explicate the inner logic of the fictional metaphysics within the story. > ...I thought that what this inverted order was really supposed to illuminate was the >glorification of our baser drives and desires within the individual. And particularly Able's >worship of Disiri as a sort of glorification of Romantic love in all its more degenerate forms. >Able has love, but it is fixated on all the wrong things and there is, at bottom, nothing (but >garbage) once you're able to see through its surface glamour. The interesting twist is of >course that Able is able (heh) to uplift this love to something genuine in the end. > In any event I read WK on sort of a double level as a story in which the protagonist needs to not only overcome (and restore to their proper order in the soul) the darker instincts and desires that drive him, but also in a way reconcile himself to their existence - not to suppress them but to integrate and uplift them. I think you can see this process going on over the course of the books. And I agree with what you're saying here (although I might object to saying this has nothing to do with metaphysics!) Rostrum ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Chris — 28 Sep 2007, 18:51 in reply to Michael Straight Rostrum said: > And I agree with what you're saying here (although I might object to> saying this has nothing to do with metaphysics!) I can accept that there's a connection to it, but I feel that a focus on that connection is kind of looking the wrong direction when it comes to interpreting the books. I think that in many cases it can tangle things up more than is really necessary; for example looking at the Aelf as the same order of entity as a human person (just with some different distinctive properties, etc). This is perhaps going out on a limb but often I am very tempted to say that there is only one actual *person* in this entire series, albeit that person (or parts of that person) is to be found in a plethora of different characters. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stanislaus — 28 Sep 2007, 19:08 in reply to Michael Straight Hello Michael, Friday, September 28, 2007, 8:07:42 PM, you wrote: ... > > That might be true for humans, but where are such aspirations provided for > > in the text? Very few common people will even attain Skai, yet they are > > expected to worship the beings of Skai. If they can't reach the fifth level, > > what hope have they for achieving higher? I see no evidence of a campaign to > > circumvent the established rules of the game and appeal directly to the Top. > I thought that was the implication of Able being visited by Michael. > That Able is being called to aspire higher than Skai, and perhaps lead > others higher as well. In Neoplatonism there is the so called principle of mediation, which seems (and "seem" is the operative world) to operate in Mythgarth. According to it, to put it simply, you are only able to contact being from the next higher level. To contact anything higher you need a mediator. Eg Michael cannot contact Able until he becomes one of the gods of Skai etc. I say it "appears" to operate, because this particular principle is a bit dubious from a Christian point of view, and it is quite possible that there are exception to it. -- Best regards, Stanislaus mailto:sbocian at poczta.fm -----------------R--E--K--L--A--M--A----------------- Lepsze wiadomosci z kraju i z zagranicy. Nie wierzysz? Sprawdz - http://wiadomosci.interia.pl/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Straight — 28 Sep 2007, 19:33 in reply to Stanislaus > On 9/28/07, Stanislaus wrote: > In Neoplatonism there is the so called principle of mediation, which seems (and "seem" is the operative world) to operate in Mythgarth. According to it, to put it simply, you are only able to contact being from the next higher level. To contact anything higher you need a mediator. Eg Michael cannot contact Able until he becomes one of the gods of Skai etc. But doesn't Able meet Michael well before he becomes a Skai god? Rostrum ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Matthew Groves — 28 Sep 2007, 20:43 follows, by subject match Michael Straight > > In Neoplatonism there is the so called principle of mediation, which seems (and "seem" is the operative world) to operate in Mythgarth. [...] Eg Michael cannot contact Able until he becomes one of the gods of Skai etc. > But doesn't Able meet Michael well before he becomes a Skai god? I wasn't addressed, but Yes. Even if it weren't so, there is of course the constant contact between Sir Able the Overcyn and various Aelf, not to mention the denizens of Muspel and lower. Strict mediation appears not to obtain in the seven worlds. Matt G. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Roy C. Lackey — 28 Sep 2007, 22:15 follows, by subject match Matthew Groves > Rostrum wrote: > But to take a completely different tack, maybe we need to question > this idea that the Aelf have no souls. How do we know that? Who told > them that? It was Able who delivered the info (WIZARD, p-46), but it seems to be common knowledge. Its validity is apparently corroborated by Able's view of Disiri while wearing the magic helmet. The Aelf are granted very long natural lives in compensation. > In the Sun books, Wolfe is constantly giving us robots, > animals, vampire leeches, etc. that people treat as soul-less, but > turn out to show evidence of a soul. And in many of those cases, the > souls seem somehow derived from contact with human beings. So maybe > the truth is that the Aelf have no souls if they are untethered to the > human beings above them through whom they would derive a soul? This was discussed in the last quarter of '05. Disiri is the only Aelf to receive a soul (if she did) we are shown in the text. Able's blood *seemed* to be the medium. Baki got Toug's blood, but I don't see that she gained a soul by it. The only differences I can see are love and Able's status as a god. If there is a rational explanation of this Aelf/soul business, I think it has to be largely in that chapter four. -Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stanislaus — 28 Sep 2007, 22:46 in reply to Roy C. Lackey An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20070929/3d014a7f/attachment.htm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ brunians at brunians.org — 29 Sep 2007, 00:06 in reply to Stanislaus Stanislaus, Where is *.fm? . ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ thalassocrat at nym.hush.com — 29 Sep 2007, 07:36 follows, by subject match brunians at brunians.org > On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:15:56 +1000 "Roy C. Lackey" > wrote: > Rostrum wrote: > > But to take a completely different tack, maybe we need to > > question > > this idea that the Aelf have no souls. How do we know that? Who > told > them that? > > It was Able who delivered the info (WIZARD, p-46), but it seems to > be common > knowledge. Its validity is apparently corroborated by Able's view > of Disiri > while wearing the magic helmet. The Aelf are granted very long > natural lives > in compensation. Well, to be precise, Able only says that Aelf spirits are mortal, whereas human spirits are immortal. I guess it may be reasonable to assume that a mortal spirit doesn't count as a "soul", in the sense you intend, in this universe - but the point is debatable. I think one of the questions in the background for many of Wolfe's books is: "Where's Jesus & what difference will he make?". The heroes are sometimes kind of clunky Jesus-prototypes, dimly foreshadowing the real McCoy. Able's little personal salvation effort, driven by his personal little love, prefigures the salvation of all creatures which will be driven by all-embracing divine love - etc etc etc. Why Jesus hasn't impinged on Mythgathr so far - dunno! But something like that is IMO the only way of making sense of the entirely valid points you raise. > > In the Sun books, Wolfe is constantly giving us robots, > > animals, vampire leeches, etc. that people treat as soul-less, > > but > > turn out to show evidence of a soul. And in many of those cases, > the > souls seem somehow derived from contact with human beings. So > maybe > the truth is that the Aelf have no souls if they are untethered > to the > human beings above them through whom they would derive a soul? > > This was discussed in the last quarter of '05. Disiri is the only > Aelf to > receive a soul (if she did) we are shown in the text. Able's blood > *seemed* > to be the medium. Baki got Toug's blood, but I don't see that she > gained a > soul by it. The only differences I can see are love and Able's > status as a > god. If there is a rational explanation of this Aelf/soul > business, I think > it has to be largely in that chapter four. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stanislaus — 03 Oct 2007, 20:49 in reply to brunians at brunians.org Hello brunians, > Saturday, September 29, 2007, 2:06:35 AM, you wrote: > Stanislaus, > Where is *.fm? I've no idea. In this case it stands for Frequency Modulation, of all things. http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/postal.html#index It appears to mean: Federated States of Micronesia -- Best regards, Stanislaus ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jak skompromitowac Wisniewskiego? Zobacz >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1be7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ brunians at brunians.org — 03 Oct 2007, 21:56 in reply to Stanislaus > Hello brunians, > > Saturday, September 29, 2007, 2:06:35 AM, you wrote: > > Stanislaus, > > Where is *.fm? > I've no idea. In this case it stands for Frequency Modulation, of all > things. > > http://www.columbia.edu/kermit/postal.html#index > > It appears to mean: Federated States of Micronesia That's what I thought it meant. But you aren't actually there, no? You are in Poland. Best, Josh . > -- > Best regards, > Stanislaus > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jak skompromitowac Wisniewskiego? > Zobacz >>> http://link.interia.pl/f1be7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------