{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/50",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 50,
    "subject": "Geoff Tantalos!",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "1997-05-23T21:34:00+00:00",
    "last": "1997-05-23T21:34:00+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0001-0080@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "m.driussi",
        "address": "m.driussi at genie.com"
      },
      "date": "1997-05-23T21:34:00+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Geoff Tantalos!",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Reply:  Item #0244852 from URTH at LISTS.BEST.COM@INET#\n\nAll right--Geoff comes through! (Somebody from \"here\" got through to\n\"there\" and came back.)\n\nRe: Timeline of 1000 to 2000 years in the future--great!  Let's try\nit out and see what we get.  (For starters, that period isn't in the\nzodiacal age of Pisces, so figure the spring equinox in Aquarius;\nstar positions will not be as radically different from our own as\nwould be the case in other models we've been considering; if 2000\nyears from today, then each post-historical epoch could reduce down\nto a \"shrimpy\" chiliad, i.e., one thousand years each; and so on.)\n\nRe: more inhum(a/i?) on the Whorl.  Ha!  Ha!  Well, that takes a load\noff of Quetzal's shoulders. <g>\n\n=mantis=\n\nP.S. Geoff, no pressure or anything, but when are you going to\ncomplete the next stage (CLAW) of your character index?  I hope you\nhaven't given up!\n\n=m="
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}