Urth Digest, Vol 45, Issue 17

The Urth list — 3 messages, 3 voices, 13 May 2008
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/5022

Yves Meynard13 May 2008, 01:25
I was wondering why there was so much traffic on the list all of a sudden and feared it was bad news followed by a rash of shocked comments. Glad to find out it's a roll call instead -- I'll briefly add my voice to the choir. I'm a Canadian, first bought a Wolfe novel (Shadow) in 1981, the day before my 17th birthday. I've met Gene, he's a very nice guy. His work has influenced my writing -- I used to joke I wanted to be Gene Wolfe when I grew up. I'll second the recommendations for Vance and Crowley enthusiastically. I really liked Mieville's Perdido Street Station and The Scar. Iron Council, on the other hand, feels to me like his writing has gone sloppy. I stopped about halfway through it and expect to finish it some day, but it's been a disappointment. - Yves
Matthew Groves13 May 2008, 14:23

↳ in reply to Yves Meynard

4 quoted lines
On 5/12/08, Yves Meynard <meynard at videotron.ca> wrote: His work has influenced my writing
Judging by Wizard Knight, there seems to be a feedback loup of influence.
1 quoted line
I'll second the recommendations for Vance and Crowley enthusiastically. I really liked Mieville's Perdido Street Station and The Scar. Iron Council, on the other hand, feels to me like his writing has gone sloppy.
I have started and abandoned two Crowley novels, Little, Big and The Solitudes. I want to like Crowley, but The Solitudes just seemed pretentious and boring to me. Everyone who reads Wolfe says he is great, and Alice Turner wrote a whole book on him. What am I missing? Matt G.
Pedro Pereira13 May 2008, 15:01

↳ in reply to Matthew Groves

(empty)

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.