{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/5175",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 5175,
    "subject": "In defense of Pandora, by Holly Hollander",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2008-10-10T17:08:30+00:00",
    "last": "2008-10-10T17:08:30+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<cdbc18280810101008u2a339601y5f206ab9ceb46b6b@mail.gmail.com>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Matthew King",
        "address": "automatthew at gmail.com"
      },
      "date": "2008-10-10T17:08:30+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) In defense of Pandora, by Holly Hollander",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:\nPandora, by Holly Hollander\n\n-- the last being the only Wolfe novel I don't think I'll ever reread."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "In defense of Pandora, it is worth re-reading, at the very least\nbecause it has so many of the notorious Lupine tropes.\n\n- mythological themes; subversion thereof\n- a lamed man, with that explainer-of-things voice Wolfe so often uses\n(cf Silk, Ziggurat-dad, post-Valhalla Able).\n- 1st person narrative, with layered provenance.  \"By Holly\nHollander\", but this nice writer from Chicago helped her out.\n- exasperating lacunae.  \"I'll tell you about this thing later.\"  Also\njust plain skipping bits, especially after something exciting happens."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}