{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/529",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 529,
    "subject": "Napoleon Bonaparte meets the Venus de Milo",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "1998-04-30T22:30:10+00:00",
    "last": "1998-04-30T22:30:10+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0010-0037@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Dan Rabin",
        "address": "danrabin at a.crl.com"
      },
      "date": "1998-04-30T22:30:10+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Napoleon Bonaparte meets the Venus de Milo",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "[_Peace_] Williams Ansley wants to know what's behind Weer's allusion to\nthe reason that Napoleon is pictured with his hand thrust into his jacket.\n\nAnd *I* want to know what's behind Louis Gold's assertions about the Venus\nde Milo: that the form of the arms is known, that they were found with the\nstatue, and that it's almost certainly a modern forgery.\n\nIf Wolfe isn't making this up, it's a very interesting hypothesis.\n\nIf he *is* making it up, then he's got a bit of Louis Gold in him.\n\nBut we knew that.\n\n  -- Dan Rabin"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}