# The Politics Of Gene Wolfe????? *The Urth list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 18 Mar 2009* > Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright > in each message remains with the person who wrote it. > Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original > archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than > retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. --- ### David Stockhoff *18 Mar 2009, 01:43* James Without disagreeing with your larger argument, I just want to point out that your statement below makes no sense whatsoever. It's plainly an argument from analogy, and not a very coherent one. ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:46:15 -0500 From: "James Wynn" Subject: Re: (urth) The Politics Of Gene Wolfe To: "The Urth Mailing List" Message-ID: <609D2162EB2D44C9AB6D5158A8CDA99E at eMachinePC> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original -------------------------------- Furthermore, the amendment grants this "right" to "the people." To read this amendment as pro-regulators like to would mean that the first amendment "right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances" would only apply to the right of state governments to assemble and to make official statements to the Federal government. ------------------------------ ---