{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/5437",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 5437,
    "subject": "Urth Digest, Vol 57, Issue 25",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2009-05-19T21:16:53+00:00",
    "last": "2009-05-19T21:16:53+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<4A1321C5.2060108@verizon.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "David Stockhoff",
        "address": "dstockhoff at verizon.net"
      },
      "date": "2009-05-19T21:16:53+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Urth Digest, Vol 57, Issue 25",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Art Laffer, huh?"
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "------------------------------\n\nMessage: 4\nDate: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:01:03 -0500\nFrom: \"James Wynn\" <crushtv at gmail.com>\nSubject: Re: (urth) Gene Wolfe Fans Talk Politics (Again)\nTo: \"The Urth Mailing List\" <urth at lists.urth.net>\nMessage-ID: <D67BBCB673F4491BB8DC3A37289BD563 at eMachinePC>\nContent-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=\"iso-8859-1\";\n\treply-type=response\n\n\n\nYou can say that \"Well, we live in a society, and that's just the burden \nthat rich people will have to bear to live in it with us. Fine. The Wall \nStreet Journal has an article yesterday by Art Laffer on what the response \nof rich people is to that ultimatum.\n\nhttp://online.wsj.com/article/SB124260067214828295.html\n\nThey leave.\nJust as the pilgrims left when Wat set up shop in the forest.\n\nSo the arrangement is unsustainable (if increased prosperity for all is the \ngoal).\n\nJ. \n\n\n\n------------------------------"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}