{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/5583",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 5583,
    "subject": "John C. Wright on Borges & Wolfe",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2010-04-19T23:42:31+00:00",
    "last": "2010-04-19T23:42:31+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<l2mcbf55b101004191642pfc333a8di19059c51be3519ca@mail.gmail.com>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Gwern Branwen",
        "address": "gwern0 at gmail.com"
      },
      "date": "2010-04-19T23:42:31+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) John C. Wright on Borges & Wolfe",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "http://johncwright.livejournal.com/331497.html\n\nConnects 3 Borges story to TBOTNS. I don't think the connections will\nbe much controversial.\n\n(I do disagree with his theory of Borges as a parodist of non-theistic\nphilosophy; that he sees Borges that way says more about Wright than\nBorges. Borges can't believe in the Christian God because, as he says\nin the introduction to _Book of Imaginary Beings_, the Trinity is more\nfantastic an imagining than any he could devise.\nTo know theology is not to believe:  \"He [Omar Khayyam] is an atheist,\nbut knows how to interpret in orthodox style the most difficult\npassages of the Koran; for every educated man is a theologian and\nfaith is not a requisite.\")"
        },
        {
          "kind": "sig",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "gwern"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}