{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/5626",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 5626,
    "subject": "Urth Digest, Vol 70, Issue 47",
    "messages": 3,
    "voices": 2,
    "first": "2010-06-06T18:19:46+00:00",
    "last": "2010-06-06T18:40:32+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<1913442136-1275848386-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2100257751-@bda2172.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>",
      "from": {
        "name": "jtsween at gmail.com",
        "address": "jtsween at gmail.com"
      },
      "date": "2010-06-06T18:19:46+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Urth Digest, Vol 70, Issue 47",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Subject: re: (Urth) \nReligious writers and their audience. \n\nRegarding Tolkien's alleged Anglican agnosticism... He was a devout Catholic.  And I'm quite sure CS Lewis (Church of England) would take grave offense at that characterization. (Afterwards he would of course forgive you and likely have you over for a pint.  When is that man's canonization going forth, btw?)\nSent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: urth-request at lists.urth.net\nDate: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 06:44:55 \nTo: <urth at lists.urth.net>\nSubject: Urth Digest, Vol 70, Issue 47\n\nSend Urth mailing list submissions to\n\turth at lists.urth.net\n\nTo subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<AANLkTilnPj9K7NvNwfkXLItx6X06FQNOFw2uz9KImolr@mail.gmail.com>",
      "from": {
        "name": "John Watkins",
        "address": "john.watkins04 at gmail.com"
      },
      "date": "2010-06-06T18:23:43+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Urth Digest, Vol 70, Issue 47",
      "in_reply_to": "<1913442136-1275848386-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-2100257751-@bda2172.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>",
      "reply_link": "header",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "I don't think the Anglicans still canonize.  I think Lewis, in point of\nfact, argued against new canonizations.\n\nThat said, Lewis has been added to the Episcopal Church's calendar with his\nown day of rememberance, November 22nd."
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:19 PM, <jtsween at gmail.com> wrote:\nSubject: re: (Urth)\nReligious writers and their audience.\n\nRegarding Tolkien's alleged Anglican agnosticism... He was a devout\nCatholic.  And I'm quite sure CS Lewis (Church of England) would take grave\noffense at that characterization. (Afterwards he would of course forgive you\nand likely have you over for a pint.  When is that man's canonization going\nforth, btw?)\nSent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: urth-request at lists.urth.net\nDate: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 06:44:55\nTo: <urth at lists.urth.net>\nSubject: Urth Digest, Vol 70, Issue 47"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<407848873-1275849632-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-244155669-@bda2172.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>",
      "from": {
        "name": "jtsween at gmail.com",
        "address": "jtsween at gmail.com"
      },
      "date": "2010-06-06T18:40:32+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Urth Digest, Vol 70, Issue 47",
      "in_reply_to": "<AANLkTilnPj9K7NvNwfkXLItx6X06FQNOFw2uz9KImolr@mail.gmail.com>",
      "reply_link": "header",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "I think you are correct w regard to the \nAnglicans, but I was (half jokingly) referring to the Catholics!\nSent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: John Watkins <john.watkins04 at gmail.com>\nDate: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 14:23:43 \nTo: <jtsween at gmail.com>; The Urth Mailing List<urth at lists.urth.net>\nSubject: Re: (urth) Urth Digest, Vol 70, Issue 47\n\nI don't think the Anglicans still canonize.  I think Lewis, in point of\nfact, argued against new canonizations.\n\nThat said, Lewis has been added to the Episcopal Church's calendar with his\nown day of rememberance, November 22nd."
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:19 PM, <jtsween at gmail.com> wrote:\nSubject: re: (Urth)\nReligious writers and their audience.\n\nRegarding Tolkien's alleged Anglican agnosticism... He was a devout\nCatholic.  And I'm quite sure CS Lewis (Church of England) would take grave\noffense at that characterization. (Afterwards he would of course forgive you\nand likely have you over for a pint.  When is that man's canonization going\nforth, btw?)\nSent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry\n\n-----Original Message-----\nFrom: urth-request at lists.urth.net\nDate: Sun, 06 Jun 2010 06:44:55\nTo: <urth at lists.urth.net>\nSubject: Urth Digest, Vol 70, Issue 47"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}