e: crackdown 2.0

The Urth list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 08 Jun 2010
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/5629

David Stockhoff08 Jun 2010, 22:50
That was plainly an accident. It might even have been me who did it. ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:34:08 -0700 From: "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes" <danldo at gmail.com> To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net> Subject: Re: (urth) crackdown 2.0 Message-ID: <AANLkTiluPnbLos86Vmy-ca2N-QnX8X8oPr5TOeEoEoyT at mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 8:21
3 quoted lines · depth 2
AM, Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com> wrote: What topic change, pray tell, is signaled by switching from 'travelling north' to 'Urth Digest, Vol 70, Issue 15'?
In fairness, for those who receive the list as a digest, that is the form of the subject header they get. They would have to change the subject header in order to keep it the same, so to speak. -- Dan'l Danehy-Oakes ------------------------------
28 quoted lines
urth-request at lists.urth.net wrote: Send Urth mailing list submissions to urth at lists.urth.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.urth.net/listinfo.cgi/urth-urth.net or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to urth-request at lists.urth.net You can reach the person managing the list at urth-owner at lists.urth.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Urth digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: traveling north (Jeff Wilson) 2. Re: traveling north (Roy C. Lackey) 3. Re: crackdown 2.0 (Gwern Branwen) 4. Re: crackdown 2.0 (Dan'l Danehy-Oakes) 5. travelling north (Lee Berman) 6. Re: crackdown 2.0 (brunians at brunians.org) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 00:17:43 -0500 From: Jeff Wilson <jwilson at io.com>

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.