# Rudesind / Inire / Lunar Picture *The Urth list — 106 messages, 16 voices, 26 Jul 2010* > Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright > in each message remains with the person who wrote it. > Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original > archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than > retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. --- ### Edward cotton *26 Jul 2010, 18:45* Forgive me if I am going over old ground but I am a first time user of this forum (after hanging about for a year or two) and I have just started a re-read of the New Sun after a long break. Much of what occurs later in the books I have forgotten. So I am forming theories that may turn out to be horribly ridiculous. I did see a bit of recent discussion about Rudesind and Inire — which sprang to mind as I read “The Picture-Cleaner and Others” chapter. The line that jumped off the page for me this time was - “There’s your blue Urth coming over his shoulder again, fresh as the Autarch’s fish.” Rudesind - when showing Severian the lunar landscape image. The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. I also wondered if this is something he(if it is Inire) does to all potential Autarchs / Concilators. Show them an early image of the Earth lit by the sun — fresh as the Autarch’s fish. He mentions that he has cleaned this image 2 other times in the past and I wonder if the vague times he gives could correspond to the rise of the previous two Autarchs. Well, I apologise for the quality of my English — I have no excuse apart from lack of education. _________________________________________________________________ Allumez et ?teignez votre PC en un instant avec Windows 7 ! http://clk.atdmt.com/FRM/go/238030931/direct/01/ --- ### Jeff Wilson *26 Jul 2010, 22:46 · in reply to Edward cotton* > On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: > The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind > > is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from the Old Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. Also, "your blue Urth" is ultimately the translator's choice of words, not necessarily a literal translation of what Severian recorded. "Your [item]" is part of an English idiom that is popular among craftsmen who work on other people's property, perhaps like an engineer who has been hired to improve an existing potato chip production line, and this has become a marketing tool where "your" addresses the audience even if they don't own the item yet, and even if the crafter is promoting a recipe or abstract idea rather than a service. Googling "your basic" yields 2 million + examples of this modest variation, but the idiom is at least decades old; "Your Show of Shows" debuted in 1950. > I also wondered if this is something he(if it is Inire) does to all > potential > > Autarchs / Concilators. Show them an early image of the Earth lit by the > > sun — fresh as the Autarch’s fish. He mentions that he has cleaned > > this image 2 other times in the past and I wonder if the vague times he > gives > > could correspond to the rise of the previous two Autarchs. Inire has been around since at least the reign of Ymar, about a thousand years before Severian, and there have been dozens of Autarchs during this time. However, there were only two before Severian that stood trial in Yesod, they might correspond to the two earlier cleanings. > Well, I apologise for the quality of my English — I have no excuse apart > from lack of education. You are doing fine. Effort of speech encourages brevity and consideration. Some other posters here are given to overuse their command of English almost as much as I do. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### brunians at brunians.org *26 Jul 2010, 22:48 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: > On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. > If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from the Old > Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a > false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. Why do you say this? Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? . --- ### John Watkins *26 Jul 2010, 23:05 · in reply to brunians at brunians.org* It isn't who else has met Rudesind, it's who else has met Inire. Severian is for all intents and purposes also Thecla and the Old Autarch, both of whom know Inire. He might has missed the connection in Shadow, when he wasn't other people yet, but in Citadel he is and is thinking and talking about Inire with Rudesind. Sort of a big thing to miss. It's possible that virtually everything Rudesind says is a lie and he is elaborately disguised to hide the fact that he is Father Inire. I'm not certain what purpose that deception would serve by the time of Citadel. > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, wrote: > Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: >> On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >>> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >>> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. >> If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from the Old >> Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a >> false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. > Why do you say this? > > Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? > > . > > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jane Delawney *26 Jul 2010, 23:19 · in reply to Edward cotton* Hello Edward, great (as a fellow newb) to read you on list. > On 26/07/10 19:45, Edward cotton wrote: > Forgive me if I am going over old ground but I am a first time user of this forum > (after hanging about for a year or two) and I have just started a re-read of the > New Sun after a long break. > Recently went back to it after 15 years myself. Now reading it *again* and starting to appreciate all those little wrinkles one never noticed earlier. The passage which just struck me today was that regarding Sev's first encounter with Master Ultan: "...Again I seemed to hear bronze, and quite suddenly I felt that he and I were dead, and that the darkness surrounding us was grave soil pressing in about our eyes, grave soil through which the bell called us to worship at whatever shrines may exist below ground ..." Severian proceeds to have a very vivid recollection of the woman extracted by Vodalus's men from her grave, so vivid indeed that for a moment, he perceives that dead face superimposed upon the "almost luminous whiteness" of the speaker. The speaker is Master Ultan, of course, of the Guild of Curators (Librarians' branch). Questions that occur to me on reading this passage now would include (i) why does Ultan's voice resound like a bronze bell? (ii) why does this sound give Sev such a vivid and nightmarish sensation of being already dead and buried and (iii) how come Sev can suddenly see in the dark?!! It's pretty clear from surrounding descriptive passages that this part of the Library is *utterly* dark - dark enough that the darkness presses upon the eyes like grave-soil - yet Sev's vision of the woman extracted from her grave is superimposed in his eyes upon an 'almost luminous whiteness' in front of him. What is he seeing? Is the figure of Ultan somewhat self-luminous? A few paragraphs later it has been demoted to merely 'dim'. Yet if there is even a 'dim' figure perceptible here, Sev must be overstating the depth of the 'grave like' darkness he has reported a short time before. Either Ultan is actually self-luminous (!) or this is one of those places where GW subtly gives notice that Sev is an unreliable narrator. Or both of course. Either way, this passage makes me think that Ultan is possibly a stronger contender for 'cacogen' status than Rudesind. Though I don't think there's any immediate reason to assume that either one of them being a 'cacogen' means that they are therefore to be identified with Inire. > The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind > is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. > Have to admit I'd always taken 'your blue Urth' as a figure of speech. Had not grokked at all that 'your' might have a specific meaning here, ie. 'yours not mine'; but having re-read the same passage just now I have to admit it's possible. > I also wondered if this is something he(if it is Inire) does to all potential > Autarchs / Concilators. Show them an early image of the Earth lit by the > sun — fresh as the Autarch’s fish. He mentions that he has cleaned > this image 2 other times in the past and I wonder if the vague times he gives > could correspond to the rise of the previous two Autarchs. > Do you mean the only two other Autarchs who have either dared, or thought it appropriate to, go to Yesod in quest of the New Sun? Those would be Ymar himself, and also Appian (if this identification is correct - the Old Autarch to whom Sev proves to be successor). None of the others (and we are told explicitly, several times over, that there have been hundreds of them; men, women, even children) took the Test - and Sev himself provides a more than adequate explanation for this, which is that more than likely they saw their immediate duty to the Commonwealth as paramount. [Duh. Given the importance of the 'fish' symbol later on, it just now occurs to me that perhaps there's even more to the remark about 'fresh as the Autarch's *fish*' than appears on the surface. But perhaps I'm just getting carried away here.] > Well, I apologise for the quality of my English — I have no excuse apart from lack of education. > I wish I could write any other language as well as you do English - I'd assumed you were a native speaker until I read that last sentence! BTW please excuse me for altering the header when responding, it's the only way I can get my ISP's mail server to return my own list posts to me. regards JD --- ### brunians at brunians.org *26 Jul 2010, 23:45 · in reply to John Watkins* People never disguise themselves and lie, do they? . > It isn't who else has met Rudesind, it's who else has met Inire. > > Severian is for all intents and purposes also Thecla and the Old Autarch, > both of whom know Inire. He might has missed the connection in Shadow, > when > he wasn't other people yet, but in Citadel he is and is thinking and > talking > about Inire with Rudesind. Sort of a big thing to miss. > > It's possible that virtually everything Rudesind says is a lie and he is > elaborately disguised to hide the fact that he is Father Inire. I'm not > certain what purpose that deception would serve by the time of Citadel. > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, wrote: >> Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: >>> On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >>>> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >>>> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. >>> If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from the Old >>> Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a >>> false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. >> Why do you say this? >> >> Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? >> >> . >> >> >> _______________________________________________ --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 00:38 · in reply to brunians at brunians.org* No, those things are known to happen. They're even known to happen for no reason. Heck, maybe little Severian is Inire. He doesn't look like him, or act like him, or talk like him. But Inire can probably disguise himself pretty well, and lie. > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, wrote: > People never disguise themselves and lie, do they? > > . >> It isn't who else has met Rudesind, it's who else has met Inire. >> >> Severian is for all intents and purposes also Thecla and the Old Autarch, >> both of whom know Inire. He might has missed the connection in Shadow, >> when >> he wasn't other people yet, but in Citadel he is and is thinking and >> talking >> about Inire with Rudesind. Sort of a big thing to miss. >> >> It's possible that virtually everything Rudesind says is a lie and he is >> elaborately disguised to hide the fact that he is Father Inire. I'm not >> certain what purpose that deception would serve by the time of Citadel. >> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, wrote: >>> Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: >>>> On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >>>>> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >>>>> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. >>>> If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from the Old >>>> Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a >>>> false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. >>> Why do you say this? >>> >>> Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? >>> >>> . >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ --- ### brunians at brunians.org *27 Jul 2010, 00:45 · in reply to John Watkins* Why can't Rudesind? What's wrong with him? . > No, those things are known to happen. > > They're even known to happen for no reason. > > Heck, maybe little Severian is Inire. He doesn't look like him, or act > like > him, or talk like him. But Inire can probably disguise himself pretty > well, > and lie. > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, wrote: >> People never disguise themselves and lie, do they? >> >> . >>> It isn't who else has met Rudesind, it's who else has met Inire. >>> >>> Severian is for all intents and purposes also Thecla and the Old >>> Autarch, >>> both of whom know Inire. He might has missed the connection in >>> Shadow, >>> when >>> he wasn't other people yet, but in Citadel he is and is thinking and >>> talking >>> about Inire with Rudesind. Sort of a big thing to miss. >>> >>> It's possible that virtually everything Rudesind says is a lie and he >>> is >>> elaborately disguised to hide the fact that he is Father Inire. I'm >>> not >>> certain what purpose that deception would serve by the time of >>> Citadel. >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, wrote: >>>> Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: >>>>> On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >>>>>> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >>>>>> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. >>>>> If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from the >>>>> Old >>>>> Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a >>>>> false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. >>>> Why do you say this? >>>> >>>> Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? >>>> >>>> . >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ --- ### brunians at brunians.org *27 Jul 2010, 00:46 · in reply to brunians at brunians.org* There's multiple people named JW on this list. Hmmm. Where's that rulebook? . > Why can't Rudesind? > > What's wrong with him? > > . >> No, those things are known to happen. >> >> They're even known to happen for no reason. >> >> Heck, maybe little Severian is Inire. He doesn't look like him, or act >> like >> him, or talk like him. But Inire can probably disguise himself pretty >> well, >> and lie. >> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, wrote: >>> People never disguise themselves and lie, do they? >>> >>> . >>>> It isn't who else has met Rudesind, it's who else has met Inire. >>>> >>>> Severian is for all intents and purposes also Thecla and the Old >>>> Autarch, >>>> both of whom know Inire. He might has missed the connection in >>>> Shadow, >>>> when >>>> he wasn't other people yet, but in Citadel he is and is thinking and >>>> talking >>>> about Inire with Rudesind. Sort of a big thing to miss. >>>> >>>> It's possible that virtually everything Rudesind says is a lie and he >>>> is >>>> elaborately disguised to hide the fact that he is Father Inire. I'm >>>> not >>>> certain what purpose that deception would serve by the time of >>>> Citadel. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, wrote: >>>>> Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: >>>>>> On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >>>>>>> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >>>>>>> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. >>>>>> If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from the >>>>>> Old >>>>>> Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a >>>>>> false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. >>>>> Why do you say this? >>>>> >>>>> Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? >>>>> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 02:43 · in reply to brunians at brunians.org* That's a good point. Applying a like exegesis to this list, Wynn, Wilson and I are all one being. > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:46 PM, wrote: > There's multiple people named JW on this list. > > Hmmm. > > Where's that rulebook? > > . >> Why can't Rudesind? >> >> What's wrong with him? >> >> . >>> No, those things are known to happen. >>> >>> They're even known to happen for no reason. >>> >>> Heck, maybe little Severian is Inire. He doesn't look like him, or act >>> like >>> him, or talk like him. But Inire can probably disguise himself pretty >>> well, >>> and lie. >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, wrote: >>>> People never disguise themselves and lie, do they? >>>> >>>> . >>>>> It isn't who else has met Rudesind, it's who else has met Inire. >>>>> >>>>> Severian is for all intents and purposes also Thecla and the Old >>>>> Autarch, >>>>> both of whom know Inire. He might has missed the connection in >>>>> Shadow, >>>>> when >>>>> he wasn't other people yet, but in Citadel he is and is thinking and >>>>> talking >>>>> about Inire with Rudesind. Sort of a big thing to miss. >>>>> >>>>> It's possible that virtually everything Rudesind says is a lie and he >>>>> is >>>>> elaborately disguised to hide the fact that he is Father Inire. I'm >>>>> not >>>>> certain what purpose that deception would serve by the time of >>>>> Citadel. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, wrote: >>>>>> Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: >>>>>>> On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >>>>>>>> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >>>>>>>> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. >>>>>>> If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from the >>>>>>> Old >>>>>>> Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a >>>>>>> false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. >>>>>> Why do you say this? >>>>>> >>>>>> Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? >>>>>> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ --- ### brunians at brunians.org *27 Jul 2010, 02:48 · in reply to John Watkins* I doubt this, but I don't know. . > That's a good point. > > Applying a like exegesis to this list, Wynn, Wilson and I are all one > being. > > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:46 PM, wrote: >> There's multiple people named JW on this list. >> >> Hmmm. >> >> Where's that rulebook? >> >> . >>> Why can't Rudesind? >>> >>> What's wrong with him? >>> >>> . >>>> No, those things are known to happen. >>>> >>>> They're even known to happen for no reason. >>>> >>>> Heck, maybe little Severian is Inire. He doesn't look like him, or >>>> act >>>> like >>>> him, or talk like him. But Inire can probably disguise himself >>>> pretty >>>> well, >>>> and lie. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, wrote: >>>>> People never disguise themselves and lie, do they? >>>>> >>>>> . >>>>>> It isn't who else has met Rudesind, it's who else has met Inire. >>>>>> >>>>>> Severian is for all intents and purposes also Thecla and the Old >>>>>> Autarch, >>>>>> both of whom know Inire. He might has missed the connection in >>>>>> Shadow, >>>>>> when >>>>>> he wasn't other people yet, but in Citadel he is and is thinking >>>>>> and >>>>>> talking >>>>>> about Inire with Rudesind. Sort of a big thing to miss. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's possible that virtually everything Rudesind says is a lie and >>>>>> he >>>>>> is >>>>>> elaborately disguised to hide the fact that he is Father Inire. >> I'm >> not >> certain what purpose that deception would serve by the time of >> Citadel. >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, wrote: >>>>>>> Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: >>>>>>>> On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >>>>>>>>> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >>>>>>>>> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. >>>>>>>> If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> Old >>>>>>>> Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a >>>>>>>> false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. >>>>>>> Why do you say this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ --- ### David Stockhoff *27 Jul 2010, 03:04 · in reply to brunians at brunians.org* Of course, not knowing is not an argument either way. What we do know is that each of the three JWs has a noticeably different manner as expressed in typed "speech." They are certainly different "personas." What we don't know is the significance of their being one. We need to know more about them. Are there any clues as to hair or eye color? > brunians at brunians.org wrote: > I doubt this, but I don't know. > > . > > > >> That's a good point. >> >> Applying a like exegesis to this list, Wynn, Wilson and I are all one >> being. >> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:46 PM, wrote: >> >> >>> There's multiple people named JW on this list. >>> >>> Hmmm. >>> >>> Where's that rulebook? >>> >>> . >>> >>> >>>> Why can't Rudesind? >>>> >>>> What's wrong with him? >>>> >>>> . >>>> >>>> >>>>> No, those things are known to happen. >>>>> >>>>> They're even known to happen for no reason. >>>>> >>>>> Heck, maybe little Severian is Inire. He doesn't look like him, or >>>>> >>> act >>> >>>>> like >>>>> him, or talk like him. But Inire can probably disguise himself >>>>> >>> pretty >>> >>>>> well, >>>>> and lie. >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> People never disguise themselves and lie, do they? >>>>>> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> It isn't who else has met Rudesind, it's who else has met Inire. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Severian is for all intents and purposes also Thecla and the Old >>>>>>> >>>>>> Autarch, >>>>>> >>>>>>> both of whom know Inire. He might has missed the connection in >>>>>>> >>>>>> Shadow, >>>>>> >>>>>>> when >>>>>>> he wasn't other people yet, but in Citadel he is and is thinking >>>>>>> >>> and >>> >>>>>>> talking >>>>>>> about Inire with Rudesind. Sort of a big thing to miss. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's possible that virtually everything Rudesind says is a lie and >>>>>>> >>> he >>> >>>>>> is >>>>>> >>>>>>> elaborately disguised to hide the fact that he is Father Inire. >>>>>>> >>> I'm >>> >>>>>> not >>>>>> >>>>>>> certain what purpose that deception would serve by the time of >>>>>>> >>>>>> Citadel. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from >>>>>>>>> >>> the >>> >>>>>> Old >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a >>>>>>>>> false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Why do you say this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ --- ### brunians at brunians.org *27 Jul 2010, 03:26 · in reply to David Stockhoff* Beats me! . > Of course, not knowing is not an argument either way. > > What we do know is that each of the three JWs has a noticeably different > manner as expressed in typed "speech." They are certainly different > "personas." > > What we don't know is the significance of their being one. > > We need to know more about them. Are there any clues as to hair or eye > color? > > brunians at brunians.org wrote: >> I doubt this, but I don't know. >> >> . >>> That's a good point. >>> >>> Applying a like exegesis to this list, Wynn, Wilson and I are all one >>> being. >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:46 PM, wrote: >>>> There's multiple people named JW on this list. >>>> >>>> Hmmm. >>>> >>>> Where's that rulebook? >>>> >>>> . >>>>> Why can't Rudesind? >>>>> >>>>> What's wrong with him? >>>>> >>>>> . >>>>>> No, those things are known to happen. >>>>>> >>>>>> They're even known to happen for no reason. >>>>>> >>>>>> Heck, maybe little Severian is Inire. He doesn't look like him, or >>>> act >>>>>> like >>>>>> him, or talk like him. But Inire can probably disguise himself >>>> pretty >>>>>> well, >>>>>> and lie. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, wrote: >>>>>>> People never disguise themselves and lie, do they? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>>> It isn't who else has met Rudesind, it's who else has met Inire. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Severian is for all intents and purposes also Thecla and the Old >>>>>>> Autarch, >>>>>>>> both of whom know Inire. He might has missed the connection in >>>>>>> Shadow, >>>>>>>> when >>>>>>>> he wasn't other people yet, but in Citadel he is and is thinking >>>> and >>>>>>>> talking >>>>>>>> about Inire with Rudesind. Sort of a big thing to miss. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's possible that virtually everything Rudesind says is a lie and >>>> he >>>>>>> is >>>>>>>> elaborately disguised to hide the fact that he is Father Inire. >>>> I'm >>>>>>> not >>>>>>>> certain what purpose that deception would serve by the time of >>>>>>> Citadel. >>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:48 PM, wrote: >>>>>>>>> Wilson, who doesn't know what I have in my pockets, writes: >>>>>>>>>> On 7/26/2010 1:45 PM, Edward cotton wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. >>>>>>>>>> If Rudesind is secretly Inire, Inire has also hidden this from >>>> the >>>>>>> Old >>>>>>>>>> Autarch, and presumably from as many autarchs as overlap a >>>>>>>>>> false-Rudesind's plausible lifetime. >>>>>>>>> Why do you say this? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Who has met Rudesind, besides Severian? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ --- ### Jeff Wilson *27 Jul 2010, 05:28 · in reply to Jane Delawney* > On 7/26/2010 6:19 PM, Jane Delawney wrote: > Recently went back to it after 15 years myself. Now reading it *again* > and starting to appreciate all those little wrinkles one never noticed > earlier. The passage which just struck me today was that regarding Sev's > first encounter with Master Ultan: "...Again I seemed to hear bronze, > and quite suddenly I felt that he and I were dead, and that the darkness > surrounding us was grave soil pressing in about our eyes, grave soil > through which the bell called us to worship at whatever shrines may > exist below ground ..." Severian proceeds to have a very vivid > recollection of the woman extracted by Vodalus's men from her grave, so > vivid indeed that for a moment, he perceives that dead face superimposed > upon the "almost luminous whiteness" of the speaker. The burial metaphor appears to be solved in Sev's final encounter with Rudesind in CITADEL: "...I wanted you to see there has been a lot come before you. That there was thousands and thousands that lived and died before you was ever thought of, some better than you. I mean, Autarch, the way you was then. You'd think anybody growing up here in the old Citadel would be born knowing all that, but I've found they're not. Being around it all the time, they don't see it. But going down there to Master Ultan brings it home to the cleverer ones." "You are the advocate of the dead." The old man nodded. "I am. People talk about being fair to this one and that one, but nobody I ever heard talks about doing right by them. We take everything they had, which is all right. And spit, most often, on their opinions, which I suppose is all right too. But we ought to remember now and then how much of what we have we got from them. I figure while I'm still here I ought to put a word in for them. And now, if you don't mind, Autarch, I'll just lay the letter here on this funny table?" > Either Ultan is actually self-luminous (!) or this is one of those > places where GW subtly gives notice that Sev is an unreliable narrator. > Or both of course. Sev's not quite at the utterly dark portion of the library yet, there's still some light from the upper floor to which his eyes are adjusting. The "almost luminous whiteness" is attributable to the recently mentioned white beard that reaches almost to Ultan's waist, and is apparently rather broad for Severian to mistake it for a garment. Given that Ultan is about 7 1/2 feet tall, that's a lot of beard, and a lot of whiteness. The shininess of hair would give it some lustre even in the darkness. And if anyone is an exULTANt, it's Ultan. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### Gerry Quinn *27 Jul 2010, 09:01 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* > From: "Jeff Wilson" > Also, "your blue Urth" is ultimately the translator's choice of words, > not necessarily a literal translation of what Severian recorded. "Your > [item]" is part of an English idiom that is popular among craftsmen who > work on other people's property, perhaps like an engineer who has been > hired to improve an existing potato chip production line, and this has > become a marketing tool where "your" addresses the audience even if they > don't own the item yet, and even if the crafter is promoting a recipe or > abstract idea rather than a service. > Googling "your basic" yields 2 million + examples of this modest > variation, but the idiom is at least decades old; "Your Show of Shows" debuted in 1950. This use of "your" is common in Ireland, and has almost certainly been so for generations.. A very common version is "your man" meaning "that man", as in "[Do you] see your man over there?". Other versions use "your" in place of "the", as in "Your frog, now, [ in contrast to some previously mentioned creature] is a more amphibious type of fellow". Of course the idiom may not be as common everywhere; but for me Rudesind's use of "your" carries no special implications relating to ownership or origin, and such implications never occurred to me before I saw them discussed on this list. - Gerry Quinn --- ### Jeff Wilson *27 Jul 2010, 10:33 · in reply to John Watkins* > On 7/26/2010 9:43 PM, John Watkins wrote: > That's a good point. > Applying a like exegesis to this list, Wynn, Wilson and I are all one being. Heh. On another list, made up of fellow A&M matriculant fen, there were so many JWs that we were assigned numbers. I am Number Five. Did I ever tell you about the "real" Second House, complete with hidden galleries for amorous and sadistic young aristocrats? ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### David Stockhoff *27 Jul 2010, 11:17 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* "Being around it all the time, they don't see it." Thus, perhaps, the Look and See phrase carved in the Atrium of Time. Rudesind's whole speech can be read with three levels of meaning. (1) the young people don't think about the past (2) there has been a long line of autarchs (3) there have been many "Yous." Severian's response doesn't commit to any one. > Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/26/2010 6:19 PM, Jane Delawney wrote: >> Recently went back to it after 15 years myself. Now reading it *again* >> and starting to appreciate all those little wrinkles one never noticed >> earlier. The passage which just struck me today was that regarding Sev's >> first encounter with Master Ultan: "...Again I seemed to hear bronze, >> and quite suddenly I felt that he and I were dead, and that the darkness >> surrounding us was grave soil pressing in about our eyes, grave soil >> through which the bell called us to worship at whatever shrines may >> exist below ground ..." Severian proceeds to have a very vivid >> recollection of the woman extracted by Vodalus's men from her grave, so >> vivid indeed that for a moment, he perceives that dead face superimposed >> upon the "almost luminous whiteness" of the speaker. > The burial metaphor appears to be solved in Sev's final encounter with > Rudesind in CITADEL: > > "...I wanted you to see there has been a lot come before you. That > there was thousands and thousands that lived and died before you was > ever thought of, some better than you. I mean, Autarch, the way you > was then. You'd think anybody growing up here in the old Citadel would > be born knowing all that, but I've found they're not. Being around it > all the time, they don't see it. But going down there to Master Ultan > brings it home to the cleverer ones." > > "You are the advocate of the dead." > > The old man nodded. "I am. People talk about being fair to this one > and that one, but nobody I ever heard talks about doing right by them. > We take everything they had, which is all right. And spit, most often, > on their opinions, which I suppose is all right too. But we ought to > remember now and then how much of what we have we got from them. I > figure while I'm still here I ought to put a word in for them. And > now, if you don't mind, Autarch, I'll just lay the letter here on this > funny table?" >> Either Ultan is actually self-luminous (!) or this is one of those >> places where GW subtly gives notice that Sev is an unreliable narrator. >> Or both of course. > Sev's not quite at the utterly dark portion of the library yet, > there's still some light from the upper floor to which his eyes are > adjusting. The "almost luminous whiteness" is attributable to the > recently mentioned white beard that reaches almost to Ultan's waist, > and is apparently rather broad for Severian to mistake it for a > garment. Given that Ultan is about 7 1/2 feet tall, that's a lot of > beard, and a lot of whiteness. The shininess of hair would give it > some lustre even in the darkness. > > And if anyone is an exULTANt, it's Ultan. --- ### David Stockhoff *27 Jul 2010, 11:18 · in reply to Gerry Quinn* Only that Wolfe is very careful with his idioms and his voices. Recall, for example, that the cacogens speak in blank verse. > Gerry Quinn wrote: > > From: "Jeff Wilson" > Also, "your blue Urth" is ultimately the translator's choice of words, > not necessarily a literal translation of what Severian recorded. "Your > [item]" is part of an English idiom that is popular among craftsmen who > work on other people's property, perhaps like an engineer who has been > hired to improve an existing potato chip production line, and this has > become a marketing tool where "your" addresses the audience even if they > don't own the item yet, and even if the crafter is promoting a recipe or > abstract idea rather than a service. >> Googling "your basic" yields 2 million + examples of this modest >> variation, but the idiom is at least decades old; "Your Show of Shows" > debuted in 1950. > > This use of "your" is common in Ireland, and has almost certainly been > so for generations.. A very common version is "your man" meaning "that > man", as in "[Do you] see your man over there?". > > Other versions use "your" in place of "the", as in "Your frog, now, [ > in contrast to some previously mentioned creature] is a more > amphibious type of fellow". > > Of course the idiom may not be as common everywhere; but for me > Rudesind's use of "your" > carries no special implications relating to ownership or origin, and > such implications never occurred to me before I saw them discussed on > this list. > > - Gerry Quinn > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ --- ### brunians at brunians.org *27 Jul 2010, 11:46 · in reply to Gerry Quinn* All of the JW's are stupid. That doesn't necessarily mean a lot: many people here are stupid, at least once in a while - even I have been stupid upon occasion. . > From: "Jeff Wilson" > Also, "your blue Urth" is ultimately the translator's choice of words, > not necessarily a literal translation of what Severian recorded. "Your > [item]" is part of an English idiom that is popular among craftsmen who > work on other people's property, perhaps like an engineer who has been > hired to improve an existing potato chip production line, and this has > become a marketing tool where "your" addresses the audience even if they > don't own the item yet, and even if the crafter is promoting a recipe or > abstract idea rather than a service. >> Googling "your basic" yields 2 million + examples of this modest >> variation, but the idiom is at least decades old; "Your Show of Shows" > debuted in 1950. > > This use of "your" is common in Ireland, and has almost certainly been so > for generations.. A very common version is "your man" meaning "that man", > as > in "[Do you] see your man over there?". > > Other versions use "your" in place of "the", as in "Your frog, now, [ in > contrast to some previously mentioned creature] is a more amphibious type > of fellow". > > Of course the idiom may not be as common everywhere; but for me Rudesind's > use of "your" > carries no special implications relating to ownership or origin, and such > implications never occurred to me before I saw them discussed on this > list. > > - Gerry Quinn > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ --- ### brunians at brunians.org *27 Jul 2010, 11:49 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Not only are they all stupid, but they are all stupid in very similar ways. And, it is interesting, is Watkins himself suggesting that he, Wilson and Wynn may in fact be the same being in a clumsy attempt at denial - the kind we'd expect from a really dumb person? . > On 7/26/2010 9:43 PM, John Watkins wrote: >> That's a good point. >> Applying a like exegesis to this list, Wynn, Wilson and I are all one >> being. > Heh. On another list, made up of fellow A&M matriculant fen, there were > so many JWs that we were assigned numbers. I am Number Five. > > Did I ever tell you about the "real" Second House, complete with hidden > galleries for amorous and sadistic young aristocrats? > > -- > Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com > IEEE Student Chapter Blog at > < http://ieeetamut.org > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Lee Berman *27 Jul 2010, 12:05 · follows brunians at brunians.org* > Edward Cotton- The use of “your blue Urth” makes me strongly believe Rudesind > is a Cacogen and possibly Inire. Well, I don't know that there is any way to prove such a thing, certainly not to those who don't like the idea. But it is interesting that different paths can arrive at the same destination. My own starting point to it was observing Rudesind as being old, bent and resembling a monkey. (I had noticed all the JW's also. Funny. I think Wolfe has a son named Roy but I don't know if his other son's name starts with J) Anyway, reminds me of a similar dual path to Agia and Agilus being Severian's cousins. For Borski it was their twin status and the aureate imagery Wolfe gives them and other family members of Severian. He (weirdly) thinks their mother is the jailed woman who makes furniture from children. For me it was the incest between Agia and Agilus that steered me in the direction and identification of a better possible mother/aunt to link them to Severian. That aunt being Cyriaca, the dark-haired, oval-faced, failed Pelerine who could be a sister (in some manner) to Catherine. If her goal, after escape from Thrax, is to survive by cooking and sewing in Nessus, it may be that she is unaware her son is dead and her daughter has closed up the used garment shop she bequeathed them. --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 12:12 · in reply to David Stockhoff* Perhaps "your blue Urth," when spoken to Severian, is meant to imply, not "your Urth, not mine, because I'm a cacogen," but "your Urth, not mine, because you may be its epitome." At any rate, I don't object to the possibility that Rudesind is a cacogen so much as I object to his identification with Inire. > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:18 AM, David Stockhoff wrote: > Only that Wolfe is very careful with his idioms and his voices. Recall, for > example, that the cacogens speak in blank verse. > > Gerry Quinn wrote: >> From: "Jeff Wilson" >>> Also, "your blue Urth" is ultimately the translator's choice of words, >> not necessarily a literal translation of what Severian recorded. "Your >> [item]" is part of an English idiom that is popular among craftsmen who >> work on other people's property, perhaps like an engineer who has been >> hired to improve an existing potato chip production line, and this has >> become a marketing tool where "your" addresses the audience even if they >> don't own the item yet, and even if the crafter is promoting a recipe or >> abstract idea rather than a service. >>> Googling "your basic" yields 2 million + examples of this modest >> variation, but the idiom is at least decades old; "Your Show of Shows" >> debuted in 1950. >> >> This use of "your" is common in Ireland, and has almost certainly been so >> for generations.. A very common version is "your man" meaning "that man", as >> in "[Do you] see your man over there?". >> >> Other versions use "your" in place of "the", as in "Your frog, now, [ in >> contrast to some previously mentioned creature] is a more amphibious type >> of fellow". >> >> Of course the idiom may not be as common everywhere; but for me Rudesind's >> use of "your" >> carries no special implications relating to ownership or origin, and such >> implications never occurred to me before I saw them discussed on this list. >> >> - Gerry Quinn >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ --- ### Edward cotton *27 Jul 2010, 13:03 · in reply to John Watkins* To JD and others who have followed this thread. Hello JD - aye, it is good to hear from a fellow newb and someone reading the books with a relatively fresh pair of eyes. And I am glad you assumed I was a native speaker - as indeed I am - but one who dropped all Language study at an early age and suffers with some appalling grammar and, no doubt, use of some inappropriate word choices. I have yet to re-read the parts you mentioned but shall have a look when I get a chance. And I agree with you and others who took "your blue Utrth" as a manner of speech - as it well could be -I cannae deny it. And if he did mean "your" as in "not mine" it could have another number of interpretations and the leap to Inire is one I cannot justify yet(if ever). And, as I have a poor memory, more akin to the main dude from the soldier books - whose name escapes me - than Severian, I could well be forming easily discredited theories. Though I am beginning to suspect Rudesind is indeed a Cacogen - and if what you say is true about only 3 Autarchs trying for the big job then I am also beginning to suspect Rudesind may be the 'true' Inire possibly showing the picture for the third(italicized as in the text) time - a vision of Urth under a fully working sun. Inire may be working for Rudesind - or an active distraction - doing the dirty work etc. Could all be rubbish - I know not yet. The joy of having a poor memory is that you can spend a lot less on new books. Eddy --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 13:52 · in reply to Edward cotton* Monkey descriptions (those hand-like feet and apelike mannerisms) and a clear detachment from "your Urth," makes the idea of Inire's curators as clones or cacogens quite tempting. Just Sayin'. ...ryan > On Jul 27, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Edward cotton wrote: > To JD and others who have followed this thread. > > Hello JD - aye, it is good to hear from a fellow newb and someone reading the books > > with a relatively fresh pair of eyes. And I am glad you assumed I was a native speaker - as indeed I am - but one who > > dropped all Language study at an early age and suffers with some appalling > > grammar and, no doubt, use of some inappropriate word choices. > > > > I have yet to re-read the parts you mentioned but shall have a look when I get a chance. > > > > And I agree with you and others who took "your blue Utrth" as a manner of speech - as it well could be -I cannae deny it. > > And if he did mean "your" as in "not mine" it could have another number of interpretations and the leap to Inire is one I cannot justify yet(if ever). > > And, as I have a poor memory, more akin to the main dude from the soldier books - whose name escapes me - than Severian, I could > > well be forming easily discredited theories. > > > > Though I am beginning to suspect Rudesind is indeed a Cacogen - and if what you say is true about only 3 Autarchs trying for the big job > > then I am also beginning to suspect Rudesind may be the 'true' Inire possibly showing the picture for the third(italicized as in the text) time - a vision > > of Urth under a fully working sun. Inire may be working for Rudesind - or an active distraction - doing the dirty work etc. > > Could all be rubbish - I know not yet. The joy of having a poor memory is that you can spend a lot less on new books. > > > Eddy > > Votre vie priv?e l'est-elle vraiment — Internet Explorer 8 vous prot?ge gratuitement > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jeff Wilson *27 Jul 2010, 13:57 · in reply to Gerry Quinn* > On 7/27/2010 4:01 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote: > > From: "Jeff Wilson" > Also, "your blue Urth" is ultimately the translator's choice of words, > not necessarily a literal translation of what Severian recorded. "Your > [item]" is part of an English idiom that is popular among craftsmen who > work on other people's property, perhaps like an engineer who has been > hired to improve an existing potato chip production line, and this has > become a marketing tool where "your" addresses the audience even if they > don't own the item yet, and even if the crafter is promoting a recipe or > abstract idea rather than a service. >> Googling "your basic" yields 2 million + examples of this modest >> variation, but the idiom is at least decades old; "Your Show of Shows" > debuted in 1950. > > This use of "your" is common in Ireland, and has almost certainly been > so for generations.. A very common version is "your man" meaning "that > man", as in "[Do you] see your man over there?". > > Other versions use "your" in place of "the", as in "Your frog, now, [ in > contrast to some previously mentioned creature] is a more amphibious > type of fellow". That's fascinating. In isolation, it may not have been clear that my post refers to the idiom being of the English language in contrast to French or whatever other language with which Edward Cotton may be more familiar, rather than of the English people. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### Jeff Wilson *27 Jul 2010, 14:09 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > On 7/27/2010 8:52 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > Monkey descriptions (those hand-like feet and apelike mannerisms) and a > clear detachment from "your Urth," makes the idea of Inire's curators as > clones or cacogens quite tempting. Inire's letter is written awfully small for a guy with foot-long hands. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 14:17 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Which only proves how cunning Inire's disguise is! Of course, it may be that I find your point convincing because we're one entity. I wonder if I'm your clone, a different time-travel iteration of you, or a long-lost twin, or you in disguise. Or I could be an inhumu with a copy of your soul. Or another person altogether, but possessed by a copy of your soul which had been uploaded into Mainframe. ...I may be leaving some possibilities out. > On 7/27/10, Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/27/2010 8:52 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> Monkey descriptions (those hand-like feet and apelike mannerisms) and a >> clear detachment from "your Urth," makes the idea of Inire's curators as >> clones or cacogens quite tempting. > Inire's letter is written awfully small for a guy with foot-long hands. > > -- > Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com > IEEE Student Chapter Blog at > < http://ieeetamut.org > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Edward cotton *27 Jul 2010, 14:20 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* Following from my previous posts - maybe Rudesind is one of the few Cacogens who joined humanity and worked with the Autarchs over the years. And Father Inire is a catch all term for the intelligence gathering service - or members of (I seem to remember notes and/or reports being associated with Father Inire). Rudesind, Autarch and 'Father Inire' plotting, manipulating and keeping things as they need to be. The Father, The Sun, and the Holy Ghost. I am ready for rotten tomatoes. _________________________________________________________________ Allumez et ?teignez votre PC en un instant avec Windows 7 ! http://clk.atdmt.com/FRM/go/238030931/direct/01/ --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 14:20 · in reply to John Watkins* I am also the less-turrets version of Josh, though. That would connect you two. Is that okay? I am also Dan'l's grandmother come again... as a man. ...ryan > On Jul 27, 2010, at 10:17 AM, John Watkins wrote: > Which only proves how cunning Inire's disguise is! > > Of course, it may be that I find your point convincing because we're > one entity. I wonder if I'm your clone, a different time-travel > iteration of you, or a long-lost twin, or you in disguise. Or I could > be an inhumu with a copy of your soul. Or another person altogether, > but possessed by a copy of your soul which had been uploaded into > Mainframe. > > ...I may be leaving some possibilities out. > > On 7/27/10, Jeff Wilson wrote: >> On 7/27/2010 8:52 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >>> Monkey descriptions (those hand-like feet and apelike mannerisms) and a >>> clear detachment from "your Urth," makes the idea of Inire's curators as >>> clones or cacogens quite tempting. >> Inire's letter is written awfully small for a guy with foot-long hands. >> >> -- >> Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com >> IEEE Student Chapter Blog at >> < http://ieeetamut.org > >> _______________________________________________ --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 14:30 · in reply to Edward cotton* Possibly, though Severian seems to identify Inire as an individual on more than one occasion, calling him one of his few friends on Urth. I think there's something to the theory of the Curators, who show up where Inire may have some influence, being potentially otherworldly, or non-human. Ultan's library, the pinakotheken, the botanic gardens, etc. ...ryan > On Jul 27, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Edward cotton wrote: > Following from my previous posts - maybe Rudesind is one of the few Cacogens who joined humanity and worked with the Autarchs over the years. > > And Father Inire is a catch all term for the intelligence gathering service - or members of (I seem to remember notes and/or reports being associated with Father Inire). > > Rudesind, Autarch and 'Father Inire' plotting, manipulating and keeping things as they need to be. The Father, The Sun, and the Holy Ghost. I am ready for rotten tomatoes. > > > De nouvelles Emoticones sur Messenger — T?l?chargez gratuitement les ?motic?nes Summer ! _______________________________________________ --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 14:31 · in reply to Edward cotton* > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Edward cotton wrote: > And Father Inire is a catch all term for the intelligence gathering > service - or members of (I seem to remember notes and/or reports being > associated with Father Inire). > > Rudesind, Autarch and 'Father Inire' plotting, manipulating and keeping > things as they need to be. The Father, The Sun, and the Holy Ghost. I am > ready for rotten tomatoes. Well, I have no citations handy, but Thecla and others seem to have met an individual they believe to be Father Inire. Moreover, Severian in Urth seems to think Father Inire is a person, and he's been Autarch for some time then and has access to the memories of other Autarchs. Finally, you'd need to work pretty hard to convince me that in any Trinity parallel, Father Inire isn't the "Father." > ------------------------------ > De nouvelles Emoticones sur Messenger — T?l?chargez gratuitement les > ?motic?nes Summer ! > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jerry Friedman *27 Jul 2010, 14:58 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* > On 7/27/2010 4:01 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote: > > From: "Jeff Wilson" > Also, "your blue Urth" is ultimately the translator's choice of words, > not necessarily a literal translation of what Severian recorded. I don't think we should consider that--it allows us to ignore anything. "Your > [item]" is part of an English idiom that is popular among craftsmen who > work on other people's property, perhaps like an engineer who has been > hired to improve an existing potato chip production line, and this has > become a marketing tool where "your" addresses the audience even if they > don't own the item yet, and even if the crafter is promoting a recipe or > abstract idea rather than a service. >> Googling "your basic" yields 2 million + examples of this modest >> variation, but the idiom is at least decades old; "Your Show of Shows" > debuted in 1950. > > This use of "your" is common in Ireland, and has almost certainly been > so for generations.. A very common version is "your man" meaning "that > man", as in "[Do you] see your man over there?". > > Other versions use "your" in place of "the", as in "Your frog, now, [ in > contrast to some previously mentioned creature] is a more amphibious > type of fellow". It's been common in England for a long time too. Hamlet: Your worm is your only emperor for diet: we fat all creatures else to fat us, and we fat ourselves for maggots: your fat king and your lean beggar is but variable service, two dishes, but to one table: that's the end. /Hamlet/, IV 3. First Clown: Cudgel thy brains no more about it, for your dull ass will not mend his pace with beating; and, whenyou are asked this question next, say 'a grave-maker:' the houses that he makes last till doomsday. Ibid., V 1. First Clown: Why, sir, his hide is so tanned with his trade, that he will keep out water a great while; and your water is a sore decayer of your whoreson dead body. Ibid. Jerry Friedman --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 15:06 · in reply to Jerry Friedman* >> On Jul 27, 2010, at 10:58 AM, Jerry Friedman wrote: >> This use of "your" is common in Ireland, and has almost certainly been >> so for generations.. A very common version is "your man" meaning "that >> man", as in "[Do you] see your man over there?". There is another line of thought that by Rudesind calling it "your blue Urth," he may be foreshadowing that Severian will soon rule the world itself. Just a thought. It would mean he is in collusion with Inire, and it also reenforces the Severian prior being a wanderer of the corridor of time. Later in the story, doesn't he tell Rudesind to give his future self directions to the library if he comes by? If so, might that not be Rudesind relaying a message to a younger Severian, who was Autarch? ...ryan --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 15:11 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > > . It would mean he is in collusion with Inire, and it also reenforces the > Severian prior being a wanderer of the corridor of time. Later in the story, > doesn't he tell Rudesind to give his future self directions to the library > if he comes by? If so, might that not be Rudesind relaying a message to a > younger Severian, who was Autarch? I like this, because it fits with what we know about Rudesind (he delivers messages for Inire). I'm not sure that we *know *Severian was sending a message to his younger self. He really just says basically "Well, send other boys along the same route," which is consistent with him just telling Rudesind he did the right thing and to keep up the good work. But that ties into my broader skepticism about the "other" Severian. We treat the "two Severian" theory as canon, when really it comes from Severian's own musings at the end of Citadel. I think some of the chief phenomena the theory was mean to explain (the tomb, Apu Punchau) are shown, to some extent, in Urth to be explainable by the time travel of a single Severian. But who knows. > ...ryan > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jeff Wilson *27 Jul 2010, 15:16 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > On 7/27/2010 9:20 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > I am also the less-turrets version of Josh, though. Are you calling him a naviscaput? And yourself a headless naviscaput? ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 15:20 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* That would make me a girl owl? Headwig the Headless? Not okay. ...ryan > On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:16 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/27/2010 9:20 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> I am also the less-turrets version of Josh, though. > Are you calling him a naviscaput? And yourself a headless naviscaput? > > -- > Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com > IEEE Student Chapter Blog at > < http://ieeetamut.org > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 15:34 · in reply to John Watkins* No, the two Severians seems fairly obvious to me. In the Atrium of Time, he overlaps himself in two times, from what I gathered. Here is what Severian as Autarch asks of Rudesind... "We only want to say that if a young man with an errand comes past again while you are on your ladder, you are to send him to Master Ultan. That is our order." It sort of means the story we've been told/sold is non-linear, and that the Severian at the end of Citadel exists before the Severian at the beginning of Shadow, no? ...ryan > On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:11 AM, John Watkins wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > > . It would mean he is in collusion with Inire, and it also reenforces the Severian prior being a wanderer of the corridor of time. Later in the story, doesn't he tell Rudesind to give his future self directions to the library if he comes by? If so, might that not be Rudesind relaying a message to a younger Severian, who was Autarch? > > > I like this, because it fits with what we know about Rudesind (he delivers messages for Inire). > > I'm not sure that we know Severian was sending a message to his younger self. He really just says basically "Well, send other boys along the same route," which is consistent with him just telling Rudesind he did the right thing and to keep up the good work. > > But that ties into my broader skepticism about the "other" Severian. We treat the "two Severian" theory as canon, when really it comes from Severian's own musings at the end of Citadel. I think some of the chief phenomena the theory was mean to explain (the tomb, Apu Punchau) are shown, to some extent, in Urth to be explainable by the time travel of a single Severian. > > But who knows. > > > ...ryan > _______________________________________________ --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 15:48 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > No, the two Severians seems fairly obvious to me. In the Atrium of Time, he > overlaps himself in two times, from what I gathered. Here is what Severian > as Autarch asks of Rudesind... Something weird happens in that scene. Whatever it is, it could be a local effect (it's the Atrium of Time) and it doesn't convince me that there are two different Severians rather than one Severian whose personal timeline is knotty. > "We only want to say that if a young man with an errand comes past again > while you are on your ladder, you are to send him to Master Ultan. That is > our order." > > It sort of means the story we've been told/sold is non-linear, and that the > Severian at the end of Citadel exists before the Severian at the beginning > of Shadow, no? That seems like a gigantic leap. Rudesind remembers sending a younger Severian to Master Ultan. Severian himself is asking that Rudesind do it "again." Other than the hierodules, who live backwards, who else is at an earlier point in their personal timeline during the events at the end of Citadel? > ...ryan > > > On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:11 AM, John Watkins wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> . It would mean he is in collusion with Inire, and it also reenforces the >> Severian prior being a wanderer of the corridor of time. Later in the story, >> doesn't he tell Rudesind to give his future self directions to the library >> if he comes by? If so, might that not be Rudesind relaying a message to a >> younger Severian, who was Autarch? > I like this, because it fits with what we know about Rudesind (he delivers > messages for Inire). > > I'm not sure that we *know *Severian was sending a message to his younger > self. He really just says basically "Well, send other boys along the same > route," which is consistent with him just telling Rudesind he did the right > thing and to keep up the good work. > > But that ties into my broader skepticism about the "other" Severian. We > treat the "two Severian" theory as canon, when really it comes from > Severian's own musings at the end of Citadel. I think some of the chief > phenomena the theory was mean to explain (the tomb, Apu Punchau) are shown, > to some extent, in Urth to be explainable by the time travel of a single > Severian. > > But who knows. >> ...ryan >> _______________________________________________ --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 16:13 · in reply to John Watkins* > On Jul 27, 2010, at 11:48 AM, John Watkins wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > No, the two Severians seems fairly obvious to me. In the Atrium of Time, he overlaps himself in two times, from what I gathered. Here is what Severian as Autarch asks of Rudesind... > > > > Something weird happens in that scene. Whatever it is, it could be a local effect (it's the Atrium of Time) and it doesn't convince me that there are two different Severians rather than one Severian whose personal timeline is knotty. > > "We only want to say that if a young man with an errand comes past again while you are on your ladder, you are to send him to Master Ultan. That is our order." > > It sort of means the story we've been told/sold is non-linear, and that the Severian at the end of Citadel exists before the Severian at the beginning of Shadow, no? > > > > That seems like a gigantic leap. Rudesind remembers sending a younger Severian to Master Ultan. Severian himself is asking that Rudesind do it "again." Other than the hierodules, who live backwards, who else is at an earlier point in their personal timeline during the events at the end of Citadel? Why would Severian ask Rudesind to do that? Why would that be all he asks of Rudesind before dismissing him? And after the diatribe about how Severian is: "every boy that's ever been here, and I've heard stories put on you that belong to men that was old when I was just a boy, and I've heard about things I did myself, seventy years ago." So it's just a random request to send some young man on an errand while Rudesind is on his ladder to Ultan? Honestly. Why? ...ryan --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 16:28 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > > > > Why would Severian ask Rudesind to do that? Why would that be all he asks > of Rudesind before dismissing him? And after the diatribe about how Severian > is: "every boy that's ever been here, and I've heard stories put on you that > belong to men that was old when I was just a boy, and I've heard about > things I did myself, seventy years ago." > So it's just a random request to send some young man on an errand while > Rudesind is on his ladder to Ultan? > > Honestly. Why? As I said, Severian and Rudesind have just spoken about the time Rudesind sent Severian to see Ultan. It is in Severian's past, and in Rudesind's past. They both remember it. They discuss it. Severian asks why Rudesind sent Severian to see Ultan. Rudesind explains, accepts the title "advocate for the dead," (which is, unless I am very much mistaken, a Chesteron reference). Severian says, essentially, "Very well. Carry on"--indicating that he is grateful that he was sent to Ultan. It may be that there's more to it than that, but why does there have to be? Moreover, if it is a message to a younger Severian, why does Rudesind remember doing it the first time? > ...ryan > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Lee Berman *27 Jul 2010, 16:41 · follows John Watkins* > Ryan Dunn- Why would Severian ask Rudesind to do that? Why would that > be all he asks of Rudesind before dismissing him? I think my interpretation is that Severian, at that point, doesn't know if he will be successful in bringing the New Sun. If he is not perhaps the next torturer boy should also be shown how the sun ought to look via the painting, to give him at least as good a chance as Severian for success. > I am also the less-turrets version of Josh Heh. Pun on Tourette's I assume? --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 16:46 · in reply to Lee Berman* >> On Jul 27, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Lee Berman wrote: >> Ryan Dunn- Why would Severian ask Rudesind to do that? Why would that >> be all he asks of Rudesind before dismissing him? > I think my interpretation is that Severian, at that point, doesn't know > if he will be successful in bringing the New Sun. If he is not perhaps > the next torturer boy should also be shown how the sun ought to look via > the painting, to give him at least as good a chance as Severian for success. I don't buy it. Severian and Inire walk the corridors of time, so I think he is laying the seeds for a time loop. Perhaps Rudesind, like the botanic, the mirrors, and the atrium of time, are ageless/timeless/infinite. Why would the next likely autarch be another torturer's apprentice with an errand while Rudesind is on that ladder? >> I am also the less-turrets version of Josh > Heh. Pun on Tourette's I assume? A grammatical double entendre, why not? ...ryan --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 16:49 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > > > I don't buy it. Severian and Inire walk the corridors of time, so I think > he is laying the seeds for a time loop. Perhaps Rudesind, like the botanic, > the mirrors, and the atrium of time, are ageless/timeless/infinite. Well, at least you're honest. You'd rather accept that multiple characters with no proven weird abilities are eternal than give up a theory. > Why would the next likely autarch be another torturer's apprentice with an > errand while Rudesind is on that ladder? Good Lord, you're literal. "Hey Rudesind, next time a young man like me comes by while you're on the ladder, please send him to Ultan like you did for me." means "Ignore the young man if he's not like me, or if you're not on the ladder--we're both time-travellers and I'm setting up an infinite loop" rather than "Thank you. I appreciated it. The thanks I ask is that you keep doing what you did." >>> I am also the less-turrets version of Josh >> Heh. Pun on Tourette's I assume? > A grammatical double entendre, why not? > > > ...ryan > _______________________________________________ --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 17:02 · in reply to John Watkins* > On Jul 27, 2010, at 12:49 PM, John Watkins wrote: > Well, at least you're honest. You'd rather accept that multiple characters with no proven weird abilities are eternal than give up a theory. > > Why would the next likely autarch be another torturer's apprentice with an errand while Rudesind is on that ladder? > Good Lord, you're literal. > > "Hey Rudesind, next time a young man like me comes by while you're on the ladder, please send him to Ultan like you did for me." > > means > > "Ignore the young man if he's not like me, or if you're not on the ladder--we're both time-travellers and I'm setting up an infinite loop" > > rather than > > "Thank you. I appreciated it. The thanks I ask is that you keep doing what you did." I still don't know why that specifically is what Severian would ask? Why not, hey clean up the moon guy, i like that picture. Or, hey, if you see that Racho dweeb, give him a kick in the pants. Or hey, bring me a Fechin, he's good. Rudesind's master is Inire, and Inire is a time traveler. And Rudesind is unbelievably ancient, and it seem time acts differently upon him. Plus, the time loop thing dovetails in with Severian at the end, standing where Severian the apprentice stood in the Atrium of Time, and re-reading to find out the following... "There is really no describing the sensation of being watched. I have heard it called a prickling at the back of the neck, and even a consciousness of eyes that seem to float in darkness, but it is neither - at least, not for me. It is something akin to a sourceless embarrassment, coupled with the feeling that I must not turn around, because to turn will be to appear a fool, answering the promptings of baseless intuition. Eventually, of course, one does. I turned with the vague impression that someone had followed me through the hole at the base of the dial." My theory is textually founded, not THAT crazy, is it? ...ryan --- ### Dan'l Danehy-Oakes *27 Jul 2010, 17:04 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > Rudesind's master is Inire, and Inire is a time traveler. I see two assertions here with no particular textual support for either. I'm just sayin'. ``` Dan'l Danehy-Oakes ``` --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 17:06 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > > > I still don't know why that specifically is what Severian would ask? Why > not, hey clean up the moon guy, i like that picture. Or, hey, if you see > that Racho dweeb, give him a kick in the pants. Or hey, bring me a Fechin, > he's good. Severian's Autarch. He can decorate his place any time. He and Rudesind have been talking about the time they met before, and Severian thanks him. That's it. > Rudesind's master is Inire, and Inire is a time traveler. And Rudesind is > unbelievably ancient, and it seem time acts differently upon him. It does? How? Without making reference to another speculation, please, show me how in the text time acts differently on Rudesind, and how he is "unbelievably ancient" rather than "old." > Plus, the time loop thing dovetails in with Severian at the end, standing > where Severian the apprentice stood in the Atrium of Time, and re-reading to > find out the following... > > "There is really no describing the sensation of being watched. I have heard > it called a prickling at the back of the neck, and even a consciousness > of eyes that seem to float in darkness, but it is neither - at least, not > for me. It is something akin to a sourceless embarrassment, coupled with > the feeling that I must not turn around, because to turn will be to appear a > fool, answering the promptings of baseless intuition. Eventually, of > course, one does. I turned with the vague impression that someone had > followed me through the hole at the base of the dial." There is no doubt that Severian subscribes to the two-Severians theory at the end of Citadel. There's no need to read tea-leaves on it--he comes out and says he believes in it. > My theory is textually founded, not THAT crazy, is it? > > ...ryan > > _______________________________________________ --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 17:09 · in reply to Dan'l Danehy-Oakes* Actually, thanks. Rudesind delivers a message for Inire and Severian I think says that Inire is Rudesind's master. So there's good reason to believe that, at least. Inire makes clever devices with mirrors which can be used to travel through space and maybe outside the universe. It's a bit of a leap to call him a "time traveller," but not much--the mirrors could be used that way and if Inire's a hierodul then he might be a time traveller in the sense that F, B, and O are--i.e., living backwards (like Merlin) and maybe "skipping" big chunks of time. I see no reason to accept as a premise the idea that Inire is capable of Sev-as-White-Fountain walks in the Corridors of Time. > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> Rudesind's master is Inire, and Inire is a time traveler. > I see two assertions here with no particular textual support for either. > > I'm just sayin'. > > -- > Dan'l Danehy-Oakes > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jeff Wilson *27 Jul 2010, 17:25 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > So it's just a random request to send some young man on an errand while > Rudesind is on his ladder to Ultan? > > Honestly. Why? It sounds to me like Sev is getting a little too full of himself; the heady influx of power and wisdom and confidence from his new state of being leads him to hastily decide he has it all figured out. And maybe he does. If the Frankenstein story echoes backward in time, why not the order of an Autarch? You can't be too careful. --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 17:27 · in reply to Dan'l Danehy-Oakes* > On Jul 27, 2010, at 1:04 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> Rudesind's master is Inire, and Inire is a time traveler. > I see two assertions here with no particular textual support for either. > > I'm just sayin'. > > -- > Dan'l Danehy-Oakes INIRE AS RUDESIND'S MASTER: "Rudesind, we already know the answers to the question you think we are going to ask. We know your master is what the people call a cacogen, and that for whatever reason, he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." INIRE AS TIME TRAVELER: Are cacogens immortal? If so, then my theory may be unfounded. But... "Have you heard of the mirrors of Father Inire? Do you know how they work?" "I've heard of Father Inire's Mirror, but I couldn't tell you where I heard about it. You're supposed to be able to step into it, like you'd step into a doorway, and step out on a star. I don't think it's real." "The mirrors are real. I've seen them. Up until now I always thought of them in much the same way you did as if they were a ship, but much faster. Now I'm not nearly so sure. Anyway, a certain friend of mine stepped between those mirrors and vanished. I was watching him. It was no trick and no superstition; he went wherever the mirrors take you." Are we to assume Inire built these mirrors that take you to other places (and times from what I can gather) yet has never mastered them? ...ryan --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 17:30 · in reply to John Watkins* > On Jul 27, 2010, at 1:09 PM, John Watkins wrote: > Actually, thanks. > > Rudesind delivers a message for Inire and Severian I think says that Inire is Rudesind's master. So there's good reason to believe that, at least. > > Inire makes clever devices with mirrors which can be used to travel through space and maybe outside the universe. It's a bit of a leap to call him a "time traveller," but not much--the mirrors could be used that way and if Inire's a hierodul then he might be a time traveller in the sense that F, B, and O are--i.e., living backwards (like Merlin) and maybe "skipping" big chunks of time. > > I see no reason to accept as a premise the idea that Inire is capable of Sev-as-White-Fountain walks in the Corridors of Time. > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> Rudesind's master is Inire, and Inire is a time traveler. > I see two assertions here with no particular textual support for either. > > I'm just sayin'. MORE PROOF INIRE IS RUDESIND'S MASTER: "The old Autarch told us you were his sentinel in the House Absolute, and now we know you're a servant of Father Inire's." "I am," the old man said. "I have that honor, and it's his letter I carry." . Is this obviously still a question, Dan'l? I thought this was accepted as truth. I could have missed something however. ...ryan --- ### Dan'l Danehy-Oakes *27 Jul 2010, 17:30 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* OK, Inere as Rudesind's master is clear. But: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > Are we to assume Inire built these mirrors that take you to other places (and times from what I can gather) yet has never mastered them? I see Inire as a dabbler in these mirrors, not their master. ``` Dan'l Danehy-Oakes ``` --- ### Ryan Dunn *27 Jul 2010, 17:36 · in reply to Dan'l Danehy-Oakes* > On Jul 27, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote: > OK, Inere as Rudesind's master is clear. But: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> Are we to assume Inire built these mirrors that take you to other places (and times from what I can gather) yet has never mastered them? > I see Inire as a dabbler in these mirrors, not their master. So an immortal cacogen, or able to grow to thousands of years old? It is thought he has been viziers to all autarchs past, no? Isn't time traveling just as viable in a microcosm built by Wolfe wherein time travel exists in very visible ways between Tzdakiel's ship, the Botanical Gardens, Apu Punchau, etc. ...ryan --- ### Dan'l Danehy-Oakes *27 Jul 2010, 17:48 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: > So an immortal cacogen, or able to grow to thousands of years old? So it would seem. > It is thought he has been viziers to all autarchs past, no? Yes. > Isn't time traveling just as viable in a microcosm built by Wolfe wherein > time travel exists in very visible ways between Tzdakiel's ship, the > Botanical Gardens, Apu Punchau, etc. Again, yes, it is viable. I just don't see it. (I also don't see the immense Severian family-trees being built elsewhere around here.) ``` Dan'l Danehy-Oakes ``` --- ### Lee Berman *27 Jul 2010, 18:10 · follows Dan'l Danehy-Oakes* Severian encounters three people who have facility with mirrors, Jonas, the old Autarch and Hethor. Severian encounters persons resembling Jonas and Hethor when he goes on Tzadkiel's ship. The old Autarch was also on that ship. This suggests the other person with mirror facility, (as described by Thecla), Father Inire, has some association with this ship. This line- > "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with > humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." seems to suggest Inire is not human but capable of changing his form. Severian's comment regarding Tzadkiel's portal suggests that Father Inire's versions are similar but inferior. So much to suggest Inire is a fallen form of Tzadkiel. Isangoma in the Jungle Hut, with his metallic skin and resemblance to the Jungle Guide seems a prime candidate to be a version of Inire (lots of monkeys in that scene btw). The Bible story mentioning Mt Nebo suggests to me that, like Moses, Father Inire may serve as guide to the chosen people but due to his disobedience, is not able to enter the Promised Land with them. I don't know if the Promised Land refers to Ushas or the Ship and/or Yesod but either way, it doesn't appear Father Inire is able to go to any of them. Thus I could see the possibility that he can use the mirrors for others without being able to use them himself. --- ### Jeff Wilson *27 Jul 2010, 18:26 · in reply to Dan'l Danehy-Oakes* > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> Rudesind's master is Inire, and Inire is a time traveler. > I see two assertions here with no particular textual support for either. Rudesind and the Old Autarch both say that Inire stationed Rudesind in the House Absolute. Rudesind later says Inire is his master, and Severian speaks as if his inherited memories confirm that Inire also had Rudesind stationed in the Citadel. Inire is said to have built the Botanic Gardens. The Botanic Gardens are larger on the inside than out, and visitors are able to see 20th century vintage airplanes flying overhead from within. --- ### Lee Berman *27 Jul 2010, 18:27 · follows Jeff Wilson* > OK, Inire as Rudesind's master is clear. I'm not sure it is as clear as all that. The old Autarch served as Third Bursar. Captain Tzadkiel served as a sailor on his ship. Severian served as one of his own army commanders. There is ample precedent that a person can serve as their own master in different roles in this story. --- ### John Watkins *27 Jul 2010, 18:33 · in reply to Lee Berman* These disguises work great when you're dealing with someone who never met the real you. Severian has the memories of two people who have met Inire, one countless times, when he meets Rudesind the second time. > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Lee Berman wrote: >> OK, Inire as Rudesind's master is clear. > I'm not sure it is as clear as all that. The old Autarch served > as Third Bursar. Captain Tzadkiel served as a sailor on his ship. > Severian served as one of his own army commanders. There is ample > precedent that a person can serve as their own master in different > roles in this story. > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your > inbox. > > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1 > _______________________________________________ --- ### Lee Berman *27 Jul 2010, 19:38 · follows John Watkins* > These disguises work great when you're dealing with someone who never met > the real you. True, Severian is able to identify the old Autarch in a couple guises. Still, perhaps an alien who has chosen to live on Urth as a human is a bit better at disguise than a human. Especially in a story written by an author who invented Tzadkiel, Shadow Children and Inhumi. If there is a more clear, texually supported explanation for the "real" nature of Father Inire I am interested in hearing it. --- ### David Stockhoff *29 Jul 2010, 00:39 · in reply to Lee Berman* I agree. Furthermore, if Inire remains on Urth "as a human being" he can't time-travel. Or space-travel. He has chosen to remain on Urth. As a human being. > Lee Berman wrote: > Severian encounters three people who have facility with mirrors, Jonas, > the old Autarch and Hethor. Severian encounters persons resembling Jonas > and Hethor when he goes on Tzadkiel's ship. The old Autarch was also on > that ship. > > This suggests the other person with mirror facility, (as described by Thecla), > Father Inire, has some association with this ship. This line- > > >> "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with >> humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." >> > seems to suggest Inire is not human but capable of changing his form. > Severian's comment regarding Tzadkiel's portal suggests that Father Inire's > versions are similar but inferior. So much to suggest Inire is a fallen form > of Tzadkiel. > > Isangoma in the Jungle Hut, with his metallic skin and resemblance to the Jungle > Guide seems a prime candidate to be a version of Inire (lots of monkeys in that > scene btw). The Bible story mentioning Mt Nebo suggests to me that, like Moses, > Father Inire may serve as guide to the chosen people but due to his disobedience, > is not able to enter the Promised Land with them. > > I don't know if the Promised Land refers to Ushas or the Ship and/or Yesod but either > way, it doesn't appear Father Inire is able to go to any of them. Thus I could see > the possibility that he can use the mirrors for others without being able to use > them himself. > _________________________________________________________________ > Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. > http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_2 > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jerry Friedman *29 Jul 2010, 05:00 · in reply to David Stockhoff* > Lee Berman wrote: > Severian encounters three people who have facility with mirrors, Jonas, > the old Autarch and Hethor. Severian encounters persons resembling Jonas > and Hethor when he goes on Tzadkiel's ship. The old Autarch was also on that > ship. > This suggests the other person with mirror facility, (as described by Thecla), > Father Inire, has some association with this ship. This line- >> "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with >> humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." > seems to suggest Inire is not human but capable of changing his form. I too agree with this. ... > Isangoma in the Jungle Hut, with his metallic skin and resemblance to the > Jungle > Guide seems a prime candidate to be a version of Inire (lots of monkeys in > that > scene btw). What metallic skin? I admit I'm tired, so I may have missed something. Isangoma is clearly athletic, with his "sinewy frame", capable of "leaping up" from a crouch and posing, perhaps for some time, in the attitude of a spear-fisherman leaning over a pool. He doesn't sound much like Inire, who's "bent almost double" in "The Cat". > The Bible story mentioning Mt Nebo suggests to me that, like Moses, > Father Inire may serve as guide to the chosen people but due to his > disobedience, is not able to enter the Promised Land with them. > I don't know if the Promised Land refers to Ushas or the Ship and/or Yesod but > either > way, it doesn't appear Father Inire is able to go to any of them. Thus I could > see > the possibility that he can use the mirrors for others without being able to > use them himself. If you want to connect the Moses reference to Father Inire, he's the subject of the previous chapter. He doesn't have to be Isangoma. By the way, someone said a day or two ago that O., F., and B. speak in blank verse. In BotNS, only Famulimus does, as far as I can see. Jerry Friedman --- ### David Stockhoff *29 Jul 2010, 18:22 · in reply to Jerry Friedman* I forget where Wolfe discusses it. I thought 2 of them spoke in blank verse. Either way, Wolfe puts much thought into his dialog: diction, vocabulary, rhythm, colloquialisms. His characters, as Shakespeare put it somewhere, "unfold themselves" through speech. By their speech ye may know them, every time. Except when they fake another's. We disagree on the meaning of "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." This is like reading a metaphor comparing a woman's head to a mason's hammer as implying that her head is made of metal. Such a person has merely given up all his rights and powers as a cacogen; he has not actually chosen a new form. However, since the analogy seems to be to fallen angels, I guess the loss of wings meets both criteria without contradiction. > Jerry Friedman wrote: > Lee Berman wrote: > > >> Severian encounters three people who have facility with mirrors, Jonas, >> the old Autarch and Hethor. Severian encounters persons resembling Jonas >> and Hethor when he goes on Tzadkiel's ship. The old Autarch was also on that >> ship. >> This suggests the other person with mirror facility, (as described by Thecla), >> Father Inire, has some association with this ship. This line- >> >> >>> "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with >>> humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." >>> >> seems to suggest Inire is not human but capable of changing his form. >> > I too agree with this. > > ... > > >> Isangoma in the Jungle Hut, with his metallic skin and resemblance to the >> Jungle >> Guide seems a prime candidate to be a version of Inire (lots of monkeys in >> > that > >> scene btw). >> > What metallic skin? I admit I'm tired, so I may have missed something. > > Isangoma is clearly athletic, with his "sinewy frame", capable of "leaping up" > from a crouch and posing, perhaps for some time, in the attitude of a > spear-fisherman leaning over a pool. He doesn't sound much like Inire, who's > "bent almost double" in "The Cat". > > >> The Bible story mentioning Mt Nebo suggests to me that, like Moses, >> Father Inire may serve as guide to the chosen people but due to his >> disobedience, is not able to enter the Promised Land with them. >> I don't know if the Promised Land refers to Ushas or the Ship and/or Yesod but >> either >> way, it doesn't appear Father Inire is able to go to any of them. Thus I could >> see >> the possibility that he can use the mirrors for others without being able to >> use them himself. >> > If you want to connect the Moses reference to Father Inire, he's the subject of > the previous chapter. He doesn't have to be Isangoma. > > By the way, someone said a day or two ago that O., F., and B. speak in blank > verse. In BotNS, only Famulimus does, as far as I can see. > > Jerry Friedman > > > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jeff Wilson *29 Jul 2010, 18:57 · in reply to David Stockhoff* > On 7/29/2010 1:22 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: > I forget where Wolfe discusses it. I thought 2 of them spoke in blank > verse. > > Either way, Wolfe puts much thought into his dialog: diction, > vocabulary, rhythm, colloquialisms. His characters, as Shakespeare put > it somewhere, "unfold themselves" through speech. By their speech ye may > know them, every time. Except when they fake another's. > > We disagree on the meaning of > > "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with > humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." > > This is like reading a metaphor comparing a woman's head to a mason's > hammer as implying that her head is made of metal. Such a person has > merely given up all his rights and powers as a cacogen; he has not > actually chosen a new form. However, since the analogy seems to be to > fallen angels, I guess the loss of wings meets both criteria without > contradiction. How does that work? I don't see losing the wings would be equivalent to gaining mortal flesh. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### David Stockhoff *29 Jul 2010, 19:11 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* It is a poorly understood phenomenon, and I do not pretend to expertise on the subject. I seem to recall there was a bad movie about it once ... perhaps angels trade wings for genitals when that happens. > Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/29/2010 1:22 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: >> I forget where Wolfe discusses it. I thought 2 of them spoke in blank >> verse. >> >> Either way, Wolfe puts much thought into his dialog: diction, >> vocabulary, rhythm, colloquialisms. His characters, as Shakespeare put >> it somewhere, "unfold themselves" through speech. By their speech ye may >> know them, every time. Except when they fake another's. >> >> We disagree on the meaning of >> >> "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with >> humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." >> >> This is like reading a metaphor comparing a woman's head to a mason's >> hammer as implying that her head is made of metal. Such a person has >> merely given up all his rights and powers as a cacogen; he has not >> actually chosen a new form. However, since the analogy seems to be to >> fallen angels, I guess the loss of wings meets both criteria without >> contradiction. > How does that work? I don't see losing the wings would be equivalent > to gaining mortal flesh. --- ### Jeff Wilson *29 Jul 2010, 20:06 · in reply to David Stockhoff* > On 7/29/2010 2:11 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: > It is a poorly understood phenomenon, and I do not pretend to expertise > on the subject. > > I seem to recall there was a bad movie about it once ... perhaps angels > trade wings for genitals when that happens. I was kind of in to it until they stole his shoes. "Wait...the shoes also fell from grace?" ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### David Stockhoff *29 Jul 2010, 20:12 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Wait, you know the movie? > Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/29/2010 2:11 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: >> It is a poorly understood phenomenon, and I do not pretend to expertise >> on the subject. >> >> I seem to recall there was a bad movie about it once ... perhaps angels >> trade wings for genitals when that happens. > I was kind of in to it until they stole his shoes. "Wait...the shoes > also fell from grace?" --- ### Ryan Dunn *29 Jul 2010, 20:14 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Doesn't the cumaen shed her face at some point to show the reptilian mask beneath? Isn't the Cumaen a cacogens also? Severian compares Inire to her if I recall. Also, the way Wolfe wrote the description of Agia's head hitting the stone definitely suggested "subtle clue" more than "bejeweled similie" when I read it. But that's just my opinion. ...ryan > On Jul 29, 2010, at 2:57 PM, Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/29/2010 1:22 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: >> I forget where Wolfe discusses it. I thought 2 of them spoke in blank >> verse. >> >> Either way, Wolfe puts much thought into his dialog: diction, >> vocabulary, rhythm, colloquialisms. His characters, as Shakespeare put >> it somewhere, "unfold themselves" through speech. By their speech ye may >> know them, every time. Except when they fake another's. >> >> We disagree on the meaning of >> >> "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely with >> humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." >> >> This is like reading a metaphor comparing a woman's head to a mason's >> hammer as implying that her head is made of metal. Such a person has >> merely given up all his rights and powers as a cacogen; he has not >> actually chosen a new form. However, since the analogy seems to be to >> fallen angels, I guess the loss of wings meets both criteria without >> contradiction. > How does that work? I don't see losing the wings would be equivalent to gaining mortal flesh. > > -- > Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com > IEEE Student Chapter Blog at > < http://ieeetamut.org > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jeff Wilson *29 Jul 2010, 20:44 · in reply to Ryan Dunn* > Doesn't the cumaen shed her face at some point to show the reptilian mask > beneath? Isn't the Cumaen a cacogens also? Severian compares Inire to her > if I recall. She appears as a clump of many serpents to Severian's second sight, the way Dr Talos's face looks like a stufffed fox's. She doesn't actually unmask, other than sword-swallowing the rod that should be too big for a human being to do so. The rod remains visible in the swarm, making a kind of living caduceus, or a kind of fasces or post-fasces. There are a couple of constellation serpents mentioned, IIRC, and maybe a simile with a stream or river. I think Abaia counts as a serpent in the same figurative way dragons are called serpents and worms, plus rivers are serpentine and Maxellendis' uncle describes the commanding voice coming from the river itself. That last related tale puzzles me. The very large, very pale "pandours" suggest armed and armored siblings of Idas. But why are they being smuggled on a boat? Are the scorpions and voulges too heavy to swim with? --- ### Jeff Wilson *29 Jul 2010, 20:46 · in reply to David Stockhoff* > Wait, you know the movie? The one I'm thinking of is _City of Angels_ with Meg Ryan and Lucas Cage, and it's a remake of a German film, _Wings of Desire_. --- ### Lane Haygood *29 Jul 2010, 21:04 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* The ocean is referred to as the "world-river" Oroborous. LH >> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Jeff Wilson wrote: >> Doesn't the cumaen shed her face at some point to show the reptilian mask >> beneath? Isn't the Cumaen a cacogens also? Severian compares Inire to her >> if I recall. > She appears as a clump of many serpents to Severian's second sight, the > way Dr Talos's face looks like a stufffed fox's. She doesn't actually > unmask, other than sword-swallowing the rod that should be too big for a > human being to do so. The rod remains visible in the swarm, making a kind > of living caduceus, or a kind of fasces or post-fasces. > > There are a couple of constellation serpents mentioned, IIRC, and maybe a > simile with a stream or river. > > I think Abaia counts as a serpent in the same figurative way dragons are > called serpents and worms, plus rivers are serpentine and Maxellendis' > uncle describes the commanding voice coming from the river itself. > > That last related tale puzzles me. The very large, very pale "pandours" > suggest armed and armored siblings of Idas. But why are they being > smuggled on a boat? Are the scorpions and voulges too heavy to swim with? > > _______________________________________________ --- ### António Pedro Marques *29 Jul 2010, 22:30 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Jeff Wilson wrote (29-07-2010 21:46): >> Wait, you know the movie? > The one I'm thinking of is _City of Angels_ with Meg Ryan and Lucas Cage, > and it's a remake of a German film, _Wings of Desire_. Were the ottomans a remake of the byzantines? 'Ihr w?hnt uns in weiter Ferne, doch sind wir so nah' must be one of the most beautiful lines I've ever seen in a movie. --- ### Adam Thornton *30 Jul 2010, 00:32 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* >> On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Jeff Wilson wrote: >> Wait, you know the movie? > The one I'm thinking of is _City of Angels_ with Meg Ryan and Lucas Cage, > and it's a remake of a German film, _Wings of Desire_. Oh, man. I haven't thought of _Wings of Desire_ for a long time, but I loved that film. Me, I was thinking of _Dogma_. Adam --- ### Jeff Wilson *30 Jul 2010, 01:12 · in reply to Adam Thornton* > On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Jeff Wilson wrote: >>> Wait, you know the movie? >> The one I'm thinking of is _City of Angels_ with Meg Ryan and Lucas >> Cage, >> and it's a remake of a German film, _Wings of Desire_. > Oh, man. I haven't thought of _Wings of Desire_ for a long time, but I > loved that film. > > Me, I was thinking of _Dogma_. I didn't think it was necessary for them to become mortal to partake of the plenary indulgence, but it would have been kind of futile trying to stop transcendent spirits. And there never was an explanation of why Loki and Bartleby wanted to go back to Heaven without repenting - I suppose that Jesus did not die to save fallen angels from sin. While we are on the subject of movies about the more ineffable Christian spirituality, I recommend netflixing _The Rapture_. As far as I know, it's the only R-rated biblical epic and is one of the few treatments of theodicy that can be considered even-handed without being (too) ambiguous or noncommittal. --- ### Lee Berman *30 Jul 2010, 04:56 · follows Lane Haygood* > Jeff Wilson- She [the Cumaean] appears as a clump of many serpents to Severian's > second sight, the way Dr Talos's face looks like a stufffed fox's. She doesn't actually > unmask, other than sword-swallowing the rod that should be too big for a > human being to do so. The rod remains visible in the swarm, making a kind > of living caduceus, I think it is a single snake-like thing which extends to nether-dimensions; no visible head. The "many" are faces which form the pattern on the "reptile's" back "the eyes of each face seemed lost in rapture". I absolutely agree on the caduceus reference. I can't decide if Wolfe is approving or disapproving of modern medicine's symbolic nods to its pagan roots. (including the Hippocratic Oath which starts- > "I swear by Apollo, the healer, Asclepius, Hygieia, and Panacea, and I take to witness all > the gods, all the goddesses, to....) To speculate further, I do think the witches serve, in some manner, in a medical capacity for some members of the Commonwealth. There are a few bits of evidence that witches are involved in the whole khaibit-blood sharing process used by exultant women. The Cumaean shows an obsession with resurrection of the dead and I have a suspicion that she, like Inire, takes on a few other guises in the story. Hers serve her in the quest to winnow the secret of true resurrection from Severian; a skill even Tzadkiel does not possess. One is the old leech. He (she) tells Severian that a person of his great skill is working with Vodalus for an ulterior motive. Leech- "there is nowhere a man in my profession can learn as I learn here." Severian- "you mean the eating of the dead?" Leech- "No, no. Learned men- particularly of my profession- practice that everywhere....The knowledge I seek cannot be learned in that way, since none of the recently dead possessed it, and perhaps no one has ever possessed it". We are never told what the Leech is actually trying to learn but I can guess and also guess who he/she is hoping to learn it from. The other possible Cumaean guise is Ceryx, from the distant past, also obsessed with raising the dead, also incapable of Severian's true version of it and insanely jealous as a result. I see the seance scene with Severian, the Cumaean and the witches as a strategem aimed at Severian all along, not Apu Punchau. If Jolenta had been a witch it might have been her they were really trying to resurrect via Severian. --- ### Mo Holkar *30 Jul 2010, 08:00 · in reply to Adam Thornton* > At 01:32 30/07/2010, Adam wrote: > On Jul 29, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Jeff Wilson wrote: >>> Wait, you know the movie? >> The one I'm thinking of is _City of Angels_ with Meg Ryan and Lucas Cage, >> and it's a remake of a German film, _Wings of Desire_. > Oh, man. I haven't thought of _Wings of Desire_ for a long time, > but I loved that film. > > Me, I was thinking of _Dogma_. I was thinking of 'It's a Wonderful Life', I must admit. Which of these three/four films is more likely to be dear to Wolfe's heart, would we imagine? Mo # ~ # ~ # WolfeWiki -- a wiki about Gene Wolfe http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/ --- ### Jeff Wilson *30 Jul 2010, 11:46 · in reply to Lee Berman* > On 7/29/2010 11:56 PM, Lee Berman wrote: > The Cumaean shows an obsession with resurrection of the dead and I have a suspicion that she, > like Inire, takes on a few other guises in the story. Hers serve her in the quest to winnow the > secret of true resurrection from Severian; a skill even Tzadkiel does not possess. I think it's a mistake to strongly link the Cumaean to the leech or Ceryx on the basis of their resurrection fixation - essentially *everyone* and *everything* in the BOTNS - including the title! - is connected to death and resurrection in one way or another half-dozen. Personal resurrection, the resurrection of habits and customs, of races, and of Urth herself. It might be shorter to list the elements that *aren't* about resurrection......I can't think of any off-hand. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### Ryan Dunn *30 Jul 2010, 12:35 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* The journeymen's boots mayhap? ...ryan > On Jul 30, 2010, at 7:46 AM, Jeff Wilson wrote: > It might be shorter to list the elements that *aren't* about resurrection......I can't think of any off-hand. --- ### Lee Berman *30 Jul 2010, 15:16 · follows Ryan Dunn* > Jeff Wilson- I think it's a mistake to strongly link the Cumaean to the leech or > Ceryx on the basis of their resurrection fixation - essentially *everyone* and > *everything* in the BOTNS - including the title! - is connected to death and > resurrection in one way or another half-dozen. Personal resurrection, the > resurrection of habits and customs, of races, and of Urth herself. Perhaps I should have been more clear. I perceive that the story presents two sorts of resurrection. One is pure and good and is associated with Pelerines and gems and white (or is it doppler blue?) light and angels and, perhaps, faith. The other is dark and evil and associated with secret knowledge, potions and seances and human body experimentation and so on. I think we are expected to identify which approach to resurrection the various characters in BotNS gravitate toward and to recognize the connections. The Cumaean and witches are associated with Vodalus, as is the Old Leech. We must wonder about the source of the old' Autarch's alzabo-like pharmacon, also. Baldanders and Typhon appear to rely on machinery rather than potions and witchcraft to achieve their biological goals but it seems to be in the same sort of vein of evil to me. I don't know if this dark stuff is supposed to represent satanism or demon worship or gnosticism or some amalgam of all of it. Perhaps the religious scholars can make better sense of that than me. I guess the fact that Severian seems to need both the dark arts to become Autarch and the light of the Claw/White Fountain to bring the New Sun means something. Perhaps that God/The Increate finds both necessary to achieve His goals. But we are still supposed to choose good whenever possible...aren't we? --- ### Jeff Wilson *30 Jul 2010, 16:08 · in reply to Lee Berman* > On 7/30/2010 10:16 AM, Lee Berman wrote: >> Jeff Wilson- I think it's a mistake to strongly link the Cumaean to the leech or >> Ceryx on the basis of their resurrection fixation - essentially *everyone* and >> *everything* in the BOTNS - including the title! - is connected to death and >> resurrection in one way or another half-dozen. Personal resurrection, the >> resurrection of habits and customs, of races, and of Urth herself. > Perhaps I should have been more clear. I perceive that the story presents two > sorts of resurrection. One is pure and good and is associated with Pelerines and > gems and white (or is it doppler blue?) light and angels and, perhaps, faith. I get the sense that the author is trying to convey that the various "kinds of resurrection" are a mortal projection; there is only one source of the gift of life and that is the grace of the Increate. Then there are people who presume to decide that the Increate hasn't given them enough and will try to get more some other way, rather than living and sharing so that what they've been given *is* enough. This kind of substituion of one's judgment for that of the Increate is the first step on the dark path that eventually leads the likes of Typhon and Ceryx to airs of godhood, the way Vodalus presumes to substitute himself for the Autarch. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### John Watkins *30 Jul 2010, 16:41 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Jeff Wilson wrote: > > I get the sense that the author is trying to convey that the various "kinds > of resurrection" are a mortal projection; there is only one source of the > gift of life and that is the grace of the Increate. Then there are people > who presume to decide that the Increate hasn't given them enough and will > try to get more some other way, rather than living and sharing so that what > they've been given *is* enough. This kind of substituion of one's judgment > for that of the Increate is the first step on the dark path that eventually > leads the likes of Typhon and Ceryx to airs of godhood, the way Vodalus > presumes to substitute himself for the Autarch. I really like this, and reading it the tumblers fell in my mind a little--of course it's the usurpation of the perogative of God that Wolfe means to invoke by paralleling Baldanders with Victor Frankenstein and his monster alike, and in fact the precise effect and only be achieved by a blurring of the two figures: Baldanders is like Victor Frankenstein, seeking to take over a divine role and like Victor Frankenstein, seeking to do so with forbidden science, but he is also in his rejection of God a rebellious son like the Monster. This makes Baldanders both Promethean in his giving of fire/life/science without divine license and Luciferian in his rejection of the divine. By the way, a similar dynamic of good/bad resurrections, although much simpler, is at work in the Harry Potter books, where Harry achieves various sorts of "good" immortality (protected from injury by mother's Christlike sacrifice, resurrected from dead by his own sacrifice of blood to Voldemort) while Voldemort (whose very name is so often parsed by clueless commentators as the vaguely sinister "flight of death" rather than the surely intended "fleeing death") pursues "evil" immortality, by feasting on the blood of unicorns or the use of "horcruxs." I understand that "horcrux" is Rowling's coinage, and a pun: "whore-cross," something that has the same resemblance to the salvific and immortality-granting Cross of Christ as a whore has to a bride--a quick, dirty, and likely cheap way of achieving the basest end intended. > -- > Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com > IEEE Student Chapter Blog at > < http://ieeetamut.org > > > _______________________________________________ --- ### David Duffy *30 Jul 2010, 22:25 · in reply to Lee Berman* > On Fri, 30 Jul 2010, Lee Berman wrote: > I don't know if this dark stuff is supposed to represent satanism or demon worship > or gnosticism or some amalgam of all of it. Pelagianism! --- ### David Stockhoff *31 Jul 2010, 18:03 · in reply to Lee Berman* I wonder, given the way Vodalus talks, if his path isn't almost the better one. He speaks of the sun hiding the stars that are our proper heritage, of how his masters wait until humanity is purified, and how vile are the actions of the Autarch. So although, yes, one side is nominally "white" and the other nominally "black" (as Vodalus himself puts it), the outcome seems pretty win-win, or equal parts lose-lose. Is it surprising the undines help Severian and Erebus/Abaia don't kill him? Doesn't Vodalus win when Severian is on the throne, and is not the Commonwealth thus defeated and occupied? > Lee Berman wrote: > >> Jeff Wilson- I think it's a mistake to strongly link the Cumaean to the leech or >> Ceryx on the basis of their resurrection fixation - essentially *everyone* and >> *everything* in the BOTNS - including the title! - is connected to death and >> resurrection in one way or another half-dozen. Personal resurrection, the >> resurrection of habits and customs, of races, and of Urth herself. >> > > Perhaps I should have been more clear. I perceive that the story presents two > sorts of resurrection. One is pure and good and is associated with Pelerines and > gems and white (or is it doppler blue?) light and angels and, perhaps, faith. > > The other is dark and evil and associated with secret knowledge, potions and > seances and human body experimentation and so on. I think we are expected to > identify which approach to resurrection the various characters in BotNS gravitate > toward and to recognize the connections. The Cumaean and witches are associated > with Vodalus, as is the Old Leech. We must wonder about the source of the old' > Autarch's alzabo-like pharmacon, also. Baldanders and Typhon appear to rely on > machinery rather than potions and witchcraft to achieve their biological goals > but it seems to be in the same sort of vein of evil to me. > > I don't know if this dark stuff is supposed to represent satanism or demon worship > or gnosticism or some amalgam of all of it. Perhaps the religious scholars can make > better sense of that than me. > > I guess the fact that Severian seems to need both the dark arts to become Autarch and > the light of the Claw/White Fountain to bring the New Sun means something. Perhaps that > God/The Increate finds both necessary to achieve His goals. But we are still supposed > to choose good whenever possible...aren't we? > _______________________________________________ --- ### David Stockhoff *31 Jul 2010, 18:04 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* I'd think the main issue would be substituting yourself for the Increate, not for the Autarch. > Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/30/2010 10:16 AM, Lee Berman wrote: >>> Jeff Wilson- I think it's a mistake to strongly link the Cumaean to >>> the leech or >>> Ceryx on the basis of their resurrection fixation - essentially >>> *everyone* and >>> *everything* in the BOTNS - including the title! - is connected to >>> death and >>> resurrection in one way or another half-dozen. Personal >>> resurrection, the >>> resurrection of habits and customs, of races, and of Urth herself. >> Perhaps I should have been more clear. I perceive that the story >> presents two >> sorts of resurrection. One is pure and good and is associated with >> Pelerines and >> gems and white (or is it doppler blue?) light and angels and, >> perhaps, faith. > I get the sense that the author is trying to convey that the various > "kinds of resurrection" are a mortal projection; there is only one > source of the gift of life and that is the grace of the Increate. Then > there are people who presume to decide that the Increate hasn't given > them enough and will try to get more some other way, rather than > living and sharing so that what they've been given *is* enough. This > kind of substituion of one's judgment for that of the Increate is the > first step on the dark path that eventually leads the likes of Typhon > and Ceryx to airs of godhood, the way Vodalus presumes to substitute > himself for the Autarch. --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 01:13 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* I was in fact wading in a swimming pool with only my head above water a few days ago. . > On 7/27/2010 9:20 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> I am also the less-turrets version of Josh, though. > Are you calling him a naviscaput? And yourself a headless naviscaput? > > -- > Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com > IEEE Student Chapter Blog at > < http://ieeetamut.org > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jeff Wilson *01 Aug 2010, 03:42 · in reply to David Stockhoff* > On 7/31/2010 1:03 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: > I wonder, given the way Vodalus talks, if his path isn't almost the > better one. He speaks of the sun hiding the stars that are our proper > heritage, of how his masters wait until humanity is purified, and how > vile are the actions of the Autarch. > > So although, yes, one side is nominally "white" and the other nominally > "black" (as Vodalus himself puts it), the outcome seems pretty win-win, > or equal parts lose-lose. Is it surprising the undines help Severian and > Erebus/Abaia don't kill him? Doesn't Vodalus win when Severian is on the > throne, and is not the Commonwealth thus defeated and occupied? Vodalus fails in his ambition to upset the rule of the Autarch and put the Exultants in charge. The rest of the counter-changed patchwork of good deeds by evil forces and misfortunes at the hands of the righteous is the inevitable consequence of created existence, selectively played up by Vodalus to propagandize the uncommitted. It's basic Qabbalism that in every good thing on earth there is some evil, but likewise some good can come of any evil act, and this "impurity" is in fact vital to give things balance and what we call tropisms today. The renewed sun does hide the stars, yes, but only during the day, they remain visbile at night as is proper, and their limited accessibility makes them all the more precious for their use in navigation, time-keeping, and divination. To serve the good at the cost of evil and misfortune is part of what gives it value; if to help others had an immediate prospect of repayment in kind it wouldn't be kindness so much as commerce, which is why kindness to animals was seen as the higher virtue, without hope of reward. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### Jeff Wilson *01 Aug 2010, 03:49 · in reply to David Stockhoff* > On 7/31/2010 1:04 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: > I'd think the main issue would be substituting yourself for the > Increate, not for the Autarch. They are but two steps on the same stairway to damnation, one a bit further from the end, or even the same step if you believe the Autarchy is divinely ordained; by presuming to substitute yourself for the Autarch you are substituing your choice for the Increate's. Vodalus is probably too much of a ignorant materialist (in the view of the nurse and the BOTNS's conceit) to go full black magician and seek to literally place himself on a level with the Increate. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 06:09 · in reply to Dan'l Danehy-Oakes* Dan'l has his good days and his bad days. . > OK, Inere as Rudesind's master is clear. But: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Ryan Dunn wrote: >> Are we to assume Inire built these mirrors that take you to other places >> (and times from what I can gather) yet has never mastered them? > I see Inire as a dabbler in these mirrors, not their master. > > -- > Dan'l Danehy-Oakes > _______________________________________________ --- ### António Pedro Marques *01 Aug 2010, 06:19 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Jeff Wilson wrote (01-08-2010 04:49): > Vodalus is probably too much of a ignorant materialist (in the view of > the nurse and the BOTNS's conceit) to go full black magician and seek to > literally place himself on a level with the Increate. Does anyone else get the idea that Vodalus isn't the brightest candle in the box? --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 06:45 · in reply to David Stockhoff* Angels are male and female. You don't have to take my word for this: I have never heard of someone not getting results from the enochian system. Get the calls and start chanting: http://hermetic.com/enochia/calls.html?ref=Guzels.TV I note that the complex consonents (eg rsg in vorsg) are short monosyllables. Pronunciation is not critical: these are known to be generally benign entities. . > It is a poorly understood phenomenon, and I do not pretend to expertise > on the subject. > > I seem to recall there was a bad movie about it once ... perhaps angels > trade wings for genitals when that happens. > > Jeff Wilson wrote: >> On 7/29/2010 1:22 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: >>> I forget where Wolfe discusses it. I thought 2 of them spoke in blank >>> verse. >>> >>> Either way, Wolfe puts much thought into his dialog: diction, >>> vocabulary, rhythm, colloquialisms. His characters, as Shakespeare put >>> it somewhere, "unfold themselves" through speech. By their speech ye >>> may >>> know them, every time. Except when they fake another's. >>> >>> We disagree on the meaning of >>> >>> "he is one of those few who have chosen to cast their lots entirely >>> with >>> humanity, remaining on Urth as a human being." >>> >>> This is like reading a metaphor comparing a woman's head to a mason's >>> hammer as implying that her head is made of metal. Such a person has >>> merely given up all his rights and powers as a cacogen; he has not >>> actually chosen a new form. However, since the analogy seems to be to >>> fallen angels, I guess the loss of wings meets both criteria without >>> contradiction. >> How does that work? I don't see losing the wings would be equivalent >> to gaining mortal flesh. > _______________________________________________ --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 06:48 · in reply to António Pedro Marques* > Jeff Wilson wrote (29-07-2010 21:46): >>> Wait, you know the movie? >> The one I'm thinking of is _City of Angels_ with Meg Ryan and Lucas >> Cage, and it's a remake of a German film, _Wings of Desire_. > Were the ottomans a remake of the byzantines? More like neopersians. . --- ### Jeff Wilson *01 Aug 2010, 09:29 · in reply to António Pedro Marques* > On 8/1/2010 1:19 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote: > Jeff Wilson wrote (01-08-2010 04:49): >> Vodalus is probably too much of a ignorant materialist (in the view of >> the nurse and the BOTNS's conceit) to go full black magician and seek to >> literally place himself on a level with the Increate. > Does anyone else get the idea that Vodalus isn't the brightest candle in > the > box? He's no dummy or simpleton, but I get the sense he has a problem accepting inconvenient facts. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### David Stockhoff *01 Aug 2010, 12:57 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Vodalus also desired to be autarch (per Thea's remarks). If Vodalus simply wants to put the exultants in charge, is everything else he says bullshit? And how do we know? > Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/31/2010 1:03 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: >> I wonder, given the way Vodalus talks, if his path isn't almost the >> better one. He speaks of the sun hiding the stars that are our proper >> heritage, of how his masters wait until humanity is purified, and how >> vile are the actions of the Autarch. >> >> So although, yes, one side is nominally "white" and the other nominally >> "black" (as Vodalus himself puts it), the outcome seems pretty win-win, >> or equal parts lose-lose. Is it surprising the undines help Severian and >> Erebus/Abaia don't kill him? Doesn't Vodalus win when Severian is on the >> throne, and is not the Commonwealth thus defeated and occupied? > Vodalus fails in his ambition to upset the rule of the Autarch and put > the Exultants in charge. The rest of the counter-changed patchwork of > good deeds by evil forces and misfortunes at the hands of the > righteous is the inevitable consequence of created existence, > selectively played up by Vodalus to propagandize the uncommitted. > > It's basic Qabbalism that in every good thing on earth there is some > evil, but likewise some good can come of any evil act, and this > "impurity" is in fact vital to give things balance and what we call > tropisms today. The renewed sun does hide the stars, yes, but only > during the day, they remain visbile at night as is proper, and their > limited accessibility makes them all the more precious for their use > in navigation, time-keeping, and divination. To serve the good at the > cost of evil and misfortune is part of what gives it value; if to help > others had an immediate prospect of repayment in kind it wouldn't be > kindness so much as commerce, which is why kindness to animals was > seen as the higher virtue, without hope of reward. --- ### David Stockhoff *01 Aug 2010, 12:59 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Perhaps. "If you believe the Autarchy is divinely ordained" is the key phrase. I don't see him as having Pope status, though maybe some do. > Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 7/31/2010 1:04 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: >> I'd think the main issue would be substituting yourself for the >> Increate, not for the Autarch. > They are but two steps on the same stairway to damnation, one a bit > further from the end, or even the same step if you believe the > Autarchy is divinely ordained; by presuming to substitute yourself for > the Autarch you are substituing your choice for the Increate's. > Vodalus is probably too much of a ignorant materialist (in the view of > the nurse and the BOTNS's conceit) to go full black magician and seek > to literally place himself on a level with the Increate. --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 13:01 · in reply to David Stockhoff* Why should he? The Byzantine Emperor did not. . > Perhaps. "If you believe the Autarchy is divinely ordained" is the key > phrase. I don't see him as having Pope status, though maybe some do. > > Jeff Wilson wrote: >> On 7/31/2010 1:04 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: >>> I'd think the main issue would be substituting yourself for the >>> Increate, not for the Autarch. >> They are but two steps on the same stairway to damnation, one a bit >> further from the end, or even the same step if you believe the >> Autarchy is divinely ordained; by presuming to substitute yourself for >> the Autarch you are substituing your choice for the Increate's. >> Vodalus is probably too much of a ignorant materialist (in the view of >> the nurse and the BOTNS's conceit) to go full black magician and seek >> to literally place himself on a level with the Increate. > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jeff Wilson *01 Aug 2010, 13:34 · in reply to David Stockhoff* > On 8/1/2010 7:57 AM, David Stockhoff wrote: > Vodalus also desired to be autarch (per Thea's remarks). If Vodalus > simply wants to put the exultants in charge, is everything else he says > bullshit? And how do we know? I'm not sure what you are getting at. If Vodalus wanted to be Autarch then he certainly fails, being dead and still not Autarch. It can be said that Severian is his servant and his servant is now Autarch, but that's no gain there either, since the last Autarch was just as much his servant as Severian. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### Jeff Wilson *01 Aug 2010, 13:50 · in reply to David Stockhoff* > On 8/1/2010 7:59 AM, David Stockhoff wrote: > Perhaps. "If you believe the Autarchy is divinely ordained" is the key > phrase. I don't see him as having Pope status, though maybe some do. Some of the figurative comments about the Autarch who this is that and so forth and the lack of any particularl clerical figures suggests to me that they have a more Anglican or classic Roman system, with the Autarch getting to break in line to the end of the cursus honorum. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 14:33 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Why, Wilson, do you wish to not take Gene Wolfe's word that the system depicted is that of Byzantium? Your left nut, Wilson, for a very minimum. . --- ### David Stockhoff *01 Aug 2010, 17:41 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Certainly, he believes that Erebus/Abaia will give him what he wants. That's not always the case. > Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 8/1/2010 1:19 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote: >> Jeff Wilson wrote (01-08-2010 04:49): >>> Vodalus is probably too much of a ignorant materialist (in the view of >>> the nurse and the BOTNS's conceit) to go full black magician and >>> seek to >>> literally place himself on a level with the Increate. >> Does anyone else get the idea that Vodalus isn't the brightest candle in >> the >> box? > He's no dummy or simpleton, but I get the sense he has a problem > accepting inconvenient facts. --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 17:50 · in reply to David Stockhoff* Your patron does not always give you what you want. . > Certainly, he believes that Erebus/Abaia will give him what he wants. > That's not always the case. > > Jeff Wilson wrote: >> On 8/1/2010 1:19 AM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote: >>> Jeff Wilson wrote (01-08-2010 04:49): >>>> Vodalus is probably too much of a ignorant materialist (in the view of >>>> the nurse and the BOTNS's conceit) to go full black magician and >>>> seek to >>>> literally place himself on a level with the Increate. >>> Does anyone else get the idea that Vodalus isn't the brightest candle >>> in >>> the >>> box? >> He's no dummy or simpleton, but I get the sense he has a problem >> accepting inconvenient facts. > _______________________________________________ --- ### David Stockhoff *01 Aug 2010, 17:59 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* I'm not sure either. I'm just asking. Vodalus certainly failed in becoming autarch, yes, and yes, his servant gained the throne. This is not a success for Vodalus, but it is far from being a failure. > Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 8/1/2010 7:57 AM, David Stockhoff wrote: >> Vodalus also desired to be autarch (per Thea's remarks). If Vodalus >> simply wants to put the exultants in charge, is everything else he says >> bullshit? And how do we know? > I'm not sure what you are getting at. If Vodalus wanted to be Autarch > then he certainly fails, being dead and still not Autarch. It can be > said that Severian is his servant and his servant is now Autarch, but > that's no gain there either, since the last Autarch was just as much > his servant as Severian. --- ### David Stockhoff *01 Aug 2010, 18:04 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* It does make sense. The Byzantine system had no Pope, and therefore no division between Pope and HRE. It could also be argued that the Turkish sultans were truly successors to the Eastern Roman Emperor as much as successors to the caliphs, so the dual institution was there in effect, even if the ERE was not formally defined as "Christ's vicar on Earth." So perhaps the autarch should be considered as such, whether there is textual evidence for it or not. > Jeff Wilson wrote: > On 8/1/2010 7:59 AM, David Stockhoff wrote: >> Perhaps. "If you believe the Autarchy is divinely ordained" is the key >> phrase. I don't see him as having Pope status, though maybe some do. > Some of the figurative comments about the Autarch who this is that and > so forth and the lack of any particularl clerical figures suggests to > me that they have a more Anglican or classic Roman system, with the > Autarch getting to break in line to the end of the cursus honorum. --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 18:11 · in reply to David Stockhoff* Vodalus, whatever else one may say about him, was dedicated. I'm reasonably sure that it was sufficient for him. If Agia was decent about killing him, I am absolutely sure. I think Agia would not attempt to torture someone she had nothing personal against. . > I'm not sure either. I'm just asking. > > Vodalus certainly failed in becoming autarch, yes, and yes, his servant > gained the throne. This is not a success for Vodalus, but it is far from > being a failure. > > Jeff Wilson wrote: >> On 8/1/2010 7:57 AM, David Stockhoff wrote: >>> Vodalus also desired to be autarch (per Thea's remarks). If Vodalus >>> simply wants to put the exultants in charge, is everything else he says >>> bullshit? And how do we know? >> I'm not sure what you are getting at. If Vodalus wanted to be Autarch >> then he certainly fails, being dead and still not Autarch. It can be >> said that Severian is his servant and his servant is now Autarch, but >> that's no gain there either, since the last Autarch was just as much >> his servant as Severian. > _______________________________________________ --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 18:12 · in reply to David Stockhoff* Now for the really hard question. Which character in TBoTNS do you identify with and why? I'll answer last, or never. No one really wants to know my answer. . --- ### brunians at brunians.org *01 Aug 2010, 18:13 · in reply to David Stockhoff* The Turks are the other Persians. The Turkish system is the Persian system. . > It does make sense. The Byzantine system had no Pope, and therefore no > division between Pope and HRE. It could also be argued that the Turkish > sultans were truly successors to the Eastern Roman Emperor as much as > successors to the caliphs, so the dual institution was there in effect, > even if the ERE was not formally defined as "Christ's vicar on Earth." > > So perhaps the autarch should be considered as such, whether there is > textual evidence for it or not. > > Jeff Wilson wrote: >> On 8/1/2010 7:59 AM, David Stockhoff wrote: >>> Perhaps. "If you believe the Autarchy is divinely ordained" is the key >>> phrase. I don't see him as having Pope status, though maybe some do. >> Some of the figurative comments about the Autarch who this is that and >> so forth and the lack of any particularl clerical figures suggests to >> me that they have a more Anglican or classic Roman system, with the >> Autarch getting to break in line to the end of the cursus honorum. > _______________________________________________ --- ### David Stockhoff *01 Aug 2010, 18:15 · in reply to brunians at brunians.org* Yes and no. The Ottoman system was also the Byzantine system. > brunians at brunians.org wrote: > The Turks are the other Persians. > > The Turkish system is the Persian system. > > . > > >> It does make sense. The Byzantine system had no Pope, and therefore no >> division between Pope and HRE. It could also be argued that the Turkish >> sultans were truly successors to the Eastern Roman Emperor as much as >> successors to the caliphs, so the dual institution was there in effect, >> even if the ERE was not formally defined as "Christ's vicar on Earth." >> >> So perhaps the autarch should be considered as such, whether there is >> textual evidence for it or not. >> >> Jeff Wilson wrote: >> >>> On 8/1/2010 7:59 AM, David Stockhoff wrote: >>> >>>> Perhaps. "If you believe the Autarchy is divinely ordained" is the key >>>> phrase. I don't see him as having Pope status, though maybe some do. >>>> >>> Some of the figurative comments about the Autarch who this is that and >>> so forth and the lack of any particularl clerical figures suggests to >>> me that they have a more Anglican or classic Roman system, with the >>> Autarch getting to break in line to the end of the cursus honorum. >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ --- ### Adam Thornton *01 Aug 2010, 18:48 · in reply to brunians at brunians.org* > On 08/01/2010 01:12 PM, brunians at brunians.org wrote: > Now for the really hard question. > > Which character in TBoTNS do you identify with and why? > Cyby. Who is all grown up--indeed, in his middle years--and is still only an apprentice, to someone who is for the most part beneath the notice of the Powers. Adam --- ### Jeff Wilson *01 Aug 2010, 21:38 · in reply to David Stockhoff* > On 8/1/2010 1:04 PM, David Stockhoff wrote: > It does make sense. The Byzantine system had no Pope, and therefore no > division between Pope and HRE. It could also be argued that the Turkish > sultans were truly successors to the Eastern Roman Emperor as much as > successors to the caliphs, so the dual institution was there in effect, > even if the ERE was not formally defined as "Christ's vicar on Earth." > > So perhaps the autarch should be considered as such, whether there is > textual evidence for it or not. I doubt there is a close analog, because rather than God's representative on earth of course the Autarch's highest calling is the epitome, to be Urth's representative in heaven (Yesod). That influence is probably intended to be pre-Columbian. ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` ---