# BOTNS Comic preview *The Urth list — 3 messages, 3 voices, 09 Aug 2010* > Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright > in each message remains with the person who wrote it. > Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original > archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than > retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. --- ### Jeff Wilson *09 Aug 2010, 20:42* The first couple of pages, featuring Master Palaemon: http://mordicai.livejournal.com/1772247.html ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com IEEE Student Chapter Blog at < http://ieeetamut.org > ``` --- ### Lane Haygood *09 Aug 2010, 20:49 · in reply to Jeff Wilson* Is it bad that I want to log in to my little-used LJ account to post a link to the poor beleaugered soul in the comments, directing him/her to this list? I mean, we may not be able to shed any actual light on the reader's confusion with the BOTNS, but at least we can offer up pages upon pages of interesting obfuscation. That said, not a terrible fan of the artwork, but I'd read it all the same, to see if the artists' visions match up to the one playing through my head when I read it. LH > On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Jeff Wilson wrote: > The first couple of pages, featuring Master Palaemon: > > http://mordicai.livejournal.com/1772247.html > > > -- > Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com > IEEE Student Chapter Blog at > < http://ieeetamut.org > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Dave Lebling *09 Aug 2010, 22:59 · in reply to Lane Haygood* Yes, it's bad. Let him read it through at least once on his own before getting all the answers (and the different versions of the answers) here. The comic is pretty good (unlike Lane I rather like the artwork), and does less damage to the work than Peter Jackson did to Tolkien. Only three issues were published, alas. -- Dave Lebling, aka vizcacha > Lane Haygood wrote: > Is it bad that I want to log in to my little-used LJ account to post a > link to the poor beleaugered soul in the comments, directing him/her > to this list? I mean, we may not be able to shed any actual light on > the reader's confusion with the BOTNS, but at least we can offer up > pages upon pages of interesting obfuscation. > > That said, not a terrible fan of the artwork, but I'd read it all the > same, to see if the artists' visions match up to the one playing > through my head when I read it. > > LH ---