{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/580",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 580,
    "subject": "Delage et ses amis",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "1998-05-09T10:27:28+00:00",
    "last": "1998-05-09T10:27:28+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0010-0118@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Peter Stephenson",
        "address": "pws at ifh.de"
      },
      "date": "1998-05-09T10:27:28+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Delage et ses amis",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "I absolutely agree that `unable to be photographed' is a chilling phrase,\ncoming from Wolfe.  I don't necessarily think that means there is any\n`obvious' supernatural explanation.  Wolfe is an expert at straining\nthe bounds of reality in such away that it still makes perfect sense\nthe way it is.  I continue to read the story the way I first did: that\nthere is some `non-obvious' supernatural explanation, that the narrator's\nreality is warped in some way that he simply doesn't ever see Suzanne.\nThe whole universe is conspiring that they don't meet --- even by \nbending the laws a bit.  That's what I find chilling.  I think\n(please contradict) this is the naturally Borgesian explanation.\n\npws"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}