# interview question *The Urth list — 14 messages, 8 voices, 30 Dec 2010* > Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright > in each message remains with the person who wrote it. > Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original > archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than > retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. --- ### Lee Berman *30 Dec 2010, 01:00* > Jordon Flato: Considering the Epic of Gilgamesh gives the story of Utnapishtim and a > global flood far older than the old testament, and yet very similar in > detail, I'd say it's something that goes beyond biblical veracity and just > into probable ancient history. Heh. Yep and great example Jordon as Gilgamesh is almost certainly an example of what the Hebrews would call Nephilim. A giant demon-spawn serving as a hero to foreigners. (anthropologically, it makes perfect sense for the Hebrews to demonize foreigners mating with their women. The jews have a long history of maintaining their cultural integrity by discouraging out-breeding) --- ### Jordon Flato *30 Dec 2010, 01:16 · in reply to Lee Berman* I'm intrigued by this notion you're playing out Lee. I'm not completely on board, but I really like the idea of the loss of purity in the human strain, so to speak. Especially what you bring up about Dr. Talos' play. In terms of the role of demons, and how they relate to the Hiero's and hierogrammates, for me the theme that resonates more with this (and I find this particularly true with the Inhumu/Human chain), is the idea of a lower life form being raised to a higher state by a higher form. So, as we become 'higher' in taking the blood of Christ, so the inhumu become higher by taking the blood of man. However, if Man isn't acting worthy of being 'god' to the inhumu, then the results are monstrous (see the city on Green, which I think shows what happens when the higher species which the Inhumu are imitating don't have their eyes trained vertically). There is an ancient esoteric precept which goes something like 'in order to climb the ladder, you have to put someone on the step you just occupied'. I think there is a lot of this in these books, particularly with the inhumu/man story, but also with the hierogrammates and man. So Man greats the heirogrammates (puts them on the step man just occupied), and then they climb up and out, not to be seen again. So, for the Hiero's to continue their 'progression' toward the increate, they must also raise something to the step they occupy. It is perfectly symmetrical and beautiful that they would do this to the very species (either the VERY SAME species or their correlary in different instantiation) that raised them up. And, this theme is repeated and explored very closely with the Disiri and Able in Wizard Knight. I haven't elucidated this as well as I'd like, but may try again later. > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Lee Berman wrote: >> Jordon Flato: Considering the Epic of Gilgamesh gives the story of >> Utnapishtim and a >> global flood far older than the old testament, and yet very similar in >> detail, I'd say it's something that goes beyond biblical veracity and just >> into probable ancient history. > Heh. Yep and great example Jordon as Gilgamesh is almost certainly an > example of > what the Hebrews would call Nephilim. A giant demon-spawn serving as a hero > to > foreigners. > > (anthropologically, it makes perfect sense for the Hebrews to demonize > foreigners > mating with their women. The jews have a long history of maintaining their > cultural > integrity by discouraging out-breeding) > _______________________________________________ --- ### Jordon Flato *30 Dec 2010, 01:19 · in reply to Jordon Flato* Further, as a random riff here, it could be that the Neighbors, who failed to raise the Inhumu up themselves, see something in SilkHorn which gives them hope that humanity WILL raise the inhumu up, given time. We see SilkHorn trying this with varying success throughout the books. Maybe they 'give' Blue to humans, because they realize that perhaps they can raise up the Inhumu in a way which the neighbors obviously failed at spectacularly. > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Jordon Flato wrote: > I'm intrigued by this notion you're playing out Lee. I'm not completely on > board, but I really like the idea of the loss of purity in the human strain, > so to speak. Especially what you bring up about Dr. Talos' play. > > In terms of the role of demons, and how they relate to the Hiero's and > hierogrammates, for me the theme that resonates more with this (and I find > this particularly true with the Inhumu/Human chain), is the idea of a lower > life form being raised to a higher state by a higher form. So, as we become > 'higher' in taking the blood of Christ, so the inhumu become higher by > taking the blood of man. However, if Man isn't acting worthy of being 'god' > to the inhumu, then the results are monstrous (see the city on Green, which > I think shows what happens when the higher species which the Inhumu are > imitating don't have their eyes trained vertically). There is an ancient > esoteric precept which goes something like 'in order to climb the ladder, > you have to put someone on the step you just occupied'. I think there is a > lot of this in these books, particularly with the inhumu/man story, but also > with the hierogrammates and man. So Man greats the heirogrammates (puts > them on the step man just occupied), and then they climb up and out, not to > be seen again. So, for the Hiero's to continue their 'progression' toward > the increate, they must also raise something to the step they occupy. It is > perfectly symmetrical and beautiful that they would do this to the very > species (either the VERY SAME species or their correlary in > different instantiation) that raised them up. > > And, this theme is repeated and explored very closely with the Disiri and > Able in Wizard Knight. > > I haven't elucidated this as well as I'd like, but may try again later. > > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Lee Berman wrote: >>> Jordon Flato: Considering the Epic of Gilgamesh gives the story of >>> Utnapishtim and a >>> global flood far older than the old testament, and yet very similar in >>> detail, I'd say it's something that goes beyond biblical veracity and >>> just >>> into probable ancient history. >> Heh. Yep and great example Jordon as Gilgamesh is almost certainly an >> example of >> what the Hebrews would call Nephilim. A giant demon-spawn serving as a >> hero to >> foreigners. >> >> (anthropologically, it makes perfect sense for the Hebrews to demonize >> foreigners >> mating with their women. The jews have a long history of maintaining their >> cultural >> integrity by discouraging out-breeding) >> _______________________________________________ --- ### hammstu at sbcglobal.net *30 Dec 2010, 01:33 · in reply to Jordon Flato* Man, sorry I missed lunch...great ideas Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone with SprintSpeed -----Original Message----- From: Jordon Flato Sender: urth-bounces at lists.urth.netDate: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:19:27 To: The Urth Mailing List Reply-To: The Urth Mailing List Subject: Re: (urth) interview question --- ### Jordon Flato *30 Dec 2010, 01:34 · in reply to hammstu at sbcglobal.net* Yeah, dammit stu, when will we three finally meet in the flesh!! On Dec 29, 2010 5:33 PM, wrote: Man, sorry I missed lunch...great ideas Sent from my BlackBerry? smartphone with SprintSpeed -----Original Message----- From: Jordon Flato Sender: urth-bounces at list... --- ### Lee Berman *03 Jan 2011, 03:34 · follows Jordon Flato* > Gerry Quinn: I think it is wrong to think of Aunt Jeannine as an unreliable narrator in > this instance. "An unreliable narrator is a narrator, whether in literature, film, or theatre, > whose credibility has been seriously compromised." Jeannine does not fit this definition. > Although she hides her identity, there is no credibility issue - in fact one > could say it makes her *more* credible as a judge of Veil's motivations Heh, that's pretty ironic. Aunt Jeannine misrepresents her name, gender and identity to Number Five. She also asserts that there is no evidence that abos could change shape and that they have died off long ago. Yet somehow she is a reliable narrator? About her own motivations, perhaps but, as we later see, she is completely wrong about her own theory, which is correct. > Of course, Veil's Hypothesis is not wholly false; we do have one incident of > an abo replacing a human, after they had been travelling alone together for > a long period. And clearly the shapechanging aboriginal Annese have entered > human society to some extent - but equally clearly they have not killed and > replaced the human colonists en masse. Indeed we may assume they are > outcasts for the most part. > There has been no wholesale replacement of humans by the native > Annese; this is plain from such diverse indications as eye colour, tool use, > and the stories of Marsch's interviewees. Sigh..this is so difficult.. Gerry I think you are continuing to treat a fictional world as though it were the real world, where parsimony and Occam's Razor are valid principles. In fiction they are not. You know, for years there were debates here over whether Dr. Marsch was actually replaced. I introduced the Wolfe quote you cite in the middle of one argument and there hasn't been a debate since. But it shows that some people are so intent on "weighing evidence" they forget the purpose of writing a story. Why would an author (who tends to horror) introduce Veil' Hyphothesis then write this novel full of clues twists and turns to reveal... nothing. Or one case of replacement. Or maybe just some minority replacement of the population. Where is the horror in that? Aunt Jeannine and Dr. Aubrey Veil throw down the gauntlet early: either Veil's Hypothesis is 100% false or 100% true. None of this namby-pamby partial stuff. I'm not sure how to explain it other than to say that a weak realization of Veil's Hypothesis would violate a rule of story-telling. If stories were as boringly ambiguous as the real world, with partial resolutions and half-baked conclusions, we wouldn't write or listen to fiction stories. Cinderella doesn't do the magic pumpkin, ball and slipper routine just to go on a few dates with Prince Charming then decide he isn't Mr. Right and go home to live with her steps. That story would simply suck (except as parody). Or be "lame" as Gene Wolfe put it. I don't understand your evidence of "eye color". Could you explain? We are told there is a planetary look on St. Croix. Number Five has it. With regard to the tool use issue and Marsh's interviewees you are missing something important. We hear stories which purport that abos are just animals- so bad with tools they can't use a shovel. But we have prima facie evidence they are capable of extremely fine motor skills- Handwriting. It may be poor handwriting but it is legible. If you can write legible sentences, you have become a rather skilled tool-user, by animal standards. Still, some feel that the general disrepair of both St. Croix and Ste. Anne is due to the serviceable but sub-standard tool use of the current inhabitants. --- ### Jerry Friedman *03 Jan 2011, 04:46 · in reply to Lee Berman* >> From: Lee Berman >> There has been no wholesale replacement of humans by the native >> Annese; this is plain from such diverse indications as eye colour, tool use, >> and the stories of Marsch's interviewees. > Sigh..this is so difficult.. Gerry I think you are continuing to treat a > fictional world as though it > were the real world, where parsimony and Occam's Razor are valid principles. There has to be one. We don't worry about whether all the characters in BotNS are Talking Beasts that Severian misleads us about, or Holmes's deductions about his clients are false and the clients confirm them just to be polite, or Helen of Troy was a male transvestite. Parsimony in fiction may not work the way it does in real life, though. > In fiction they are not. > You know, for years there were debates here over whether Dr. Marsch was > actually replaced. I introduced > the Wolfe quote you cite in the middle of one argument and there hasn't been a > debate since. But it shows > > that some people are so intent on "weighing evidence" they forget the purpose > of writing a story. > Why would an author (who tends to horror) introduce Veil' Hyphothesis then > write this novel full of clues > twists and turns to reveal... nothing. Or one case of replacement. Or maybe > just some minority replacement > > of the population. Where is the horror in that? The horror is in human beings are being deceived. You lose that horror if all the deceived beings are also deceivers (though you might gain a different horror--I don't remember 5HC well enough to argue about this). > Aunt Jeannine and Dr. Aubrey Veil throw down the gauntlet early: either Veil's > Hypothesis is 100% false or > > 100% true. None of this namby-pamby partial stuff. I'm not sure how to explain > it other than to say that a > > weak realization of Veil's Hypothesis would violate a rule of story-telling. If > stories were as boringly > ambiguous as the real world, with partial resolutions and half-baked > conclusions, we wouldn't write or > > listen to fiction stories. Spoilers follow: We never know whether there's a ghost in "The Turn of the Screw" or whether Timothy Archer transmigrated or how "Prot" escaped from the asylum in K-Pax. Nothing is resolved in "The Metamorphosis". Many posters on NABOKV-L treasure the ambiguity of Pale Fire and prefer to doubt obvious clues that, for instance, there's an afterlife in the novel; some even doubt there are ghosts in "The Vane Sisters". We never find out what happens to the main character of The Fixer. We don't know what it means that Milkman learned you can fly in Song of Solomon. We can be certain of one thing, though: There are no rules of story-telling. > Cinderella doesn't do the magic pumpkin, ball and slipper routine just to go on > a > > few dates with Prince Charming then decide he isn't Mr. Right and go home to > live with her steps. That > > story would simply suck (except as parody). Or be "lame" as Gene Wolfe put it. ... And yet he wrote a story where the victorious hero gets an astonishing weapon and throws it away without using it. In the Amber books, Corwin pits worlds against each other to make his crowning of himself come true, and then puts the kingship on the back burner and eventually leaves the decision to someone else. I'm sure I've read other good examples of this, maybe closer to "Cinderella", but I'm not coming up with them. Jerry Friedman --- ### Marc Aramini *03 Jan 2011, 15:06 · in reply to Jerry Friedman* Have to comment on one of Jerry's examples. Since you mentioned the Amber books, that putting aside the throne is a vital step in?Corwin's maturation. Even when stripped of memory, Corwin is still "trapped in Amber" - unable to mature, still immediately pulled into a demigod struggle with his eternally unchanging brothers, but SOMETHING eventually changes him. At the end of the first novel, even having his eyes purged out can't destroy that unchaging desire to thwart Eric, but Eric, his greatest enemy, leaves the jewel of Judgement to him at the time of his death. In the fifth/sixth grade, I would be hard pressed to choose between Wolfe or Zelazny as my favorite, but that setting aside the throne is supposed to be, I think, the definitive proof that these demigods of Amber CAN change - it just isn't likely. --- On Sun, 1/2/11, Jerry Friedman wrote: In the Amber books, Corwin pits worlds against each other to make his crowning of himself come true, and then puts the kingship on the back burner and eventually leaves the decision to someone else. I'm sure I've read other good examples of this, maybe closer to "Cinderella", but I'm not coming up with them. Jerry Friedman -----Inline Attachment Follows----- --- ### Jerry Friedman *03 Jan 2011, 16:52 · in reply to Marc Aramini* From: Marc Aramini ... > Since you mentioned the Amber books, that putting aside the throne is a vital > step in Corwin's >maturation. Even when stripped of memory, Corwin is still > "trapped in Amber" - unable to mature, >still immediately pulled into a demigod > struggle with his eternally unchanging brothers, but >SOMETHING eventually > changes him. At the end of the first novel, even having his eyes purged >out > can't destroy that unchaging desire to thwart Eric, but Eric, his greatest > enemy, leaves the jewel >of Judgement to him at the time of his death. > In the fifth/sixth grade, I would be hard pressed to choose between Wolfe or > Zelazny as my > favorite, Interesting. I wasn't ready for a lot of their work then. In fact, it was probably in seventh or eight grade that I bounced off Lord of Light (though I enjoyed it some years later). > but that setting aside the throne is supposed to be, I think, the definitive > proof that these > demigods of Amber CAN change - it just isn't likely. The other definitive moment is when Corwin creates the new pattern from his memories of a "shadow", Earth, not Amber. One of my favorite moments in fiction. (Only I wish it had been Cleveland instead of Paris.) Anyway, I agree with you completely, and thanks for "trapped in Amber". But I also think that this is an excellent example of a gun not going off. The other example I was thinking of may have been the end of Malafrena--no revolution, nothing between Itale and Piera--though perhaps that's not quite as good. Jerry Friedman > --- On Sun, 1/2/11, Jerry Friedman wrote: > > In the Amber books, Corwin pits worlds against each other to make his crowning > of himself come true, and then puts the kingship on the back burner and > eventually leaves the decision to someone else. I'm sure I've read other good > examples of this, maybe closer to "Cinderella", but I'm not coming up with them. > > Jerry Friedman > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > _______________________________________________ --- ### Gerry Quinn *03 Jan 2011, 17:54 · in reply to Lee Berman* ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lee Berman" >> Gerry Quinn: I think it is wrong to think of Aunt Jeannine as an >> unreliable narrator in >> this instance. "An unreliable narrator is a narrator, whether in >> literature, film, or theatre, >> whose credibility has been seriously compromised." Jeannine does not fit >> this definition. >> Although she hides her identity, there is no credibility issue - in fact >> one >> could say it makes her *more* credible as a judge of Veil's motivations > Heh, that's pretty ironic. Aunt Jeannine misrepresents her name, gender > and identity to Number > Five. She also asserts that there is no evidence that abos could change > shape and that they > have died off long ago. Yet somehow she is a reliable narrator? About her > own motivations, perhaps > but, as we later see, she is completely wrong about her own theory, which > is correct. She is - as befits a careful and modest scientist - stating the case for the idea that abo shapechanging is a myth. Just before that she carefully elaborates to the narrator on details of Veil's Hypothesis ("I feel sure Dr. Veil meant..."). >> Of course, Veil's Hypothesis is not wholly false; we do have one incident >> of >> an abo replacing a human, after they had been travelling alone together >> for >> a long period. And clearly the shapechanging aboriginal Annese have >> entered >> human society to some extent - but equally clearly they have not killed >> and >> replaced the human colonists en masse. Indeed we may assume they are >> outcasts for the most part. >> There has been no wholesale replacement of humans by the native >> Annese; this is plain from such diverse indications as eye colour, tool >> use, >> and the stories of Marsch's interviewees. > Sigh..this is so difficult.. Gerry I think you are continuing to treat a > fictional world as though it > were the real world, where parsimony and Occam's Razor are valid > principles. In fiction they are not. > You know, for years there were debates here over whether Dr. Marsch was > actually replaced. I introduced > the Wolfe quote you cite in the middle of one argument and there hasn't > been a debate since. But it shows > that some people are so intent on "weighing evidence" they forget the > purpose of writing a story. I am not depending on parsimony and/or Occam's Razor. I am pointing out something that is made plain as the nose on your face in countless places throughout all three novellas. I am almost at a loss as to where to begin demonstrating it; it's hard for me to guess which arguments might best sway someone who can hold such a grotesque misreading of the work as you put forward! Let's start with the simple and obvious facts of the case - two separate planets full of humans who act like humans and think they are humans and maintain a human, albeit in some parts vicious, culture, and welcome human visitors from Earth. On Sainte Anne they remember details of their journey from Earth, and tell tales of the abos and of previous human colonists. There are many myths and stories aboout the abos. There is *nothing* anywhere to suggest that they leaped on people, killed (or devoured) them and replaced them. The only incident of replacement we know of involved a man who travelled alone with a highly motivated abo for a long period - and even then we do not know any details of the original Marsch's death, which may well have been from natural causes (an infected wound) or at least accidental. If such replacement incidents had been commonplace, the colonists - who even you accept *think* they are human and live as the original humans would have - would have told tales about them and feared the abos, which patently they did not. Did nobody notice even when a second *planet* had to be infiltrated? Has Earth been taken over by the abos too? There is simply no room for the scenario you propose. The above is more than enough in itself to rule it out, but in any case Wolfe has left numerous specific clues as to the correct reading of 5HoC which also completely eliminate this idea. I will come to them (or some of them) as I go on. > Why would an author (who tends to horror) introduce Veil' Hyphothesis then > write this novel full of clues > twists and turns to reveal... nothing. Or one case of replacement. Or > maybe just some minority replacement > of the population. Where is the horror in that? Wolfe introduces many more myths and stories other than Veil's Hypothesis. Like Veil's Hypothesis (and Veil's Criticism of Veil's Hypothesis) they all have elements of truth, but it is always distorted. 5HoC is not a cheap horror TV special from the Fifties. Wolfe utilises pulp elements, but he is not writing pulp. The novel is not centred on some big reveal about the pod people of Sainte Anne. If that is your criterion for a quality read, you might be better off with other authors. If you want horror, consider the question - posed in effect by Aunt Jeannine - of whether it is more horrific that Sainte Croix is a planet inhabited by alien monsters, or a planet inhabited by humans. > Aunt Jeannine and Dr. Aubrey Veil throw down the gauntlet early: either > Veil's Hypothesis is 100% false or > 100% true. None of this namby-pamby partial stuff. I'm not sure how to > explain it other than to say that a > weak realization of Veil's Hypothesis would violate a rule of > story-telling. If stories were as boringly > ambiguous as the real world, with partial resolutions and half-baked > conclusions, we wouldn't write or > listen to fiction stories. Cinderella doesn't do the magic pumpkin, ball > and slipper routine just to go on a > few dates with Prince Charming then decide he isn't Mr. Right and go home > to live with her steps. That > story would simply suck (except as parody). Or be "lame" as Gene Wolfe put > it. Actually if it were 100% false or 100% true it would violate the rules of 5HoC, in which just about *nothing* is completely false or completely true. Veil's Hypothesis (and its contradiction, also by Veil) fit perfectly into the pattern Wolfe is creating in 5HoC, which reflects something that has often occured in the real world. A central theme - perhaps the central theme of the book as a whole, though not the title novella - of 5HoC, which seems to have passed you by, is colonisation and its consequences. The unfortunate abos are doomed to ape the culture of their conquerors, and are despised as outcasts and vagabonds. > I don't understand your evidence of "eye color". Could you explain? How can anyone miss this clear signifier which tells us (better than tool use, although it seems the French did not know of it) who is an abo and who is not? Abos have green eyes. Humans rarely do, at least not in the same shade. Here is (the superseded) Dr. Marsch, the only abo we meet outside the second novella, except perhaps the cat, whose eye colour may be inferred. The narrator of the first novella says: "His eyes, I noticed, were a bright green, without the brown tones most green eyes have." The original Marsch noted VRT's green eyes not once but twice; on the second occasion, he pronounced them "a startling green". The Annese apparently do not or cannot change their eye colour a easily as they can adapt other aspects of their physiognomy. Now you might think these green eyes are just an extra clue relating to the identity of Marsch, but there is more. Towards the end of the second novella, we read: [Sandwalker asks Cedar Branches Waving] "Mother, what colour are my eyes now?" "Green," Cedar Branches Waving answered. "They look gray in this light, but they are green. That is the colour of eyes." [...] And Seven Girls Waiting added, "Pink Butterflies' eyes are green too." Green is the colour of abo eyes. Just like two is the number of Typhon's heads. [Incidentally we aren't told what the colour of the Shadow Children's eyes are. Perhaps Wolfe felt it was so obvious that they are human that he didn't need to rub it in.] > We are told there is a planetary look on St. Croix. Number Five has it. And Marsch (the abo) doesn't! Nor, incidentally, do "the gypsies and the criminal tribes". No doubt these groups of outcasts include many abos among their number. > With regard to the tool use issue and Marsh's interviewees you are missing > something important. We hear stories which purport that abos are just > animals- so bad with tools they can't use > a shovel. But we have prima facie evidence they are capable of extremely > fine motor skills- Handwriting. It > may be poor handwriting but it is legible. If you can write legible > sentences, you have become a rather skilled > tool-user, by animal standards. By animal standards, yes (although we have learned in recent decades that animals are cleverer in this regard than we used to think). By human standards, their tool use is indeed rather poor, as we learn from several sources. Perhaps the French had an exaggerated idea of the difference; after all, they apparently failed to catch all the abos, and they never noticed the eye colour clue. > Still, some feel that the general disrepair of both St. Croix and Ste. > Anne is due to the serviceable but > sub-standard tool use of the current inhabitants. There are more than adequate rationales for any disrepair based on the human cultures and histories of the twin planets. Besides, as someone already pointed out, we know that VRT's handwriting is exceptionally bad BY THE STANDARDS of these societies. - Gerry Quinn --- ### Lee Berman *04 Jan 2011, 03:23 · follows Gerry Quinn* > Gerry Quinn: It's not at all inexplicable. He thinks of Dollo's Law in the context of > his handwriting, specifically his thumb, which he cannot use; he must hold > the pen between his fingers with his thumb unused. He is in the same > situation a human would be if humans evolved to no longer need thumbs, and > the thumb, or the neural networks controlling it, withered away. Gerry I'm in need of further explanation to understand your theory. You are implying an abo once had a thumb but evolved to not need one, then rediscovered the need while imitating Dr. Marsch? Why did abos once have a thumb then lose the need for it? And, of course, the obvious question: why does an Abo know about an obscure evolutionary principle postulated by some Belgian guy on earth in 1890 and connect it to his handwriting? Sound more like something an anthropologist would know about. If a minute portion of the brain's wiring can be imitated surely a thumb can be. Seem to be serious doubt over whether Dr. Marsch really has been replaced. There are a lot of cats about. Perhaps one bit his hand. --- ### Jeff Wilson *04 Jan 2011, 05:36 · in reply to Lee Berman* > On 1/3/2011 9:23 PM, Lee Berman wrote: >> Gerry Quinn: It's not at all inexplicable. He thinks of Dollo's Law in the context of >> his handwriting, specifically his thumb, which he cannot use; he must hold >> the pen between his fingers with his thumb unused. He is in the same >> situation a human would be if humans evolved to no longer need thumbs, and >> the thumb, or the neural networks controlling it, withered away. > Gerry I'm in need of further explanation to understand your theory. You are implying > an abo once had a thumb but evolved to not need one, then rediscovered the need while > imitating Dr. Marsch? Why did abos once have a thumb then lose the need for it? > > And, of course, the obvious question: why does an Abo know about an obscure evolutionary > principle postulated by some Belgian guy on earth in 1890 and connect it to his handwriting? > Sound more like something an anthropologist would know about. If a minute portion of the > brain's wiring can be imitated surely a thumb can be. Seem to be serious doubt over whether > Dr. Marsch really has been replaced. There are a lot of cats about. Perhaps one bit his hand. I'm still a little hazy on the Dollo's Law thing. Why is it relevant wrt to abo's shape-shifting within a single generation? If it *is* relevant, why can't the new adaptation work just as well as the old, like cetacean fatty dorsal fins vs the piscine skeletal ones? ``` Jeff Wilson - jwilson at io.com Computational Intelligence Laboratory - Texas A&M Texarkana < http://www.tamut.edu/CIL > ``` --- ### Gerry Quinn *04 Jan 2011, 16:14 · in reply to Lee Berman* > From: "Lee Berman" >> Gerry Quinn: It's not at all inexplicable. He thinks of Dollo's Law in >> the context of >> his handwriting, specifically his thumb, which he cannot use; he must hold >> the pen between his fingers with his thumb unused. He is in the same >> situation a human would be if humans evolved to no longer need thumbs, and >> the thumb, or the neural networks controlling it, withered away. > Gerry I'm in need of further explanation to understand your theory. You > are implying > an abo once had a thumb but evolved to not need one, then rediscovered the > need while > imitating Dr. Marsch? Why did abos once have a thumb then lose the need > for it? I'm not implying that at all, and neither is VRT. He does not say he is an example of Dollo's Law, but he mentions it because an aspect of it is reminiscent of his case. Let's look at a typical example of Dollo's Law. The long-ago ancestors of snakes had legs, and snakes have vestigial leg bones that serve no biological purpose that we know of. Imagine that a population of snakes moves into an environment in which their current methods of locomotion do not work well. Over time, they may evolve limbs. Dollo's Law predicts that even if they do, these new limbs will develop not from the vestigial leg bones, but from some other organ - modified scales, pehaps. The human bodies of the abos have not of course been crafted by evolution, but by mimicry; thus, Dollo's law has no direct application. We may plausibly suppose that the human ability to use the opposable thumb has not been well copied even though the thumb has - it is a reasonable explanation for the abos' poor abilities with tools, and we may even extrapolate to a general neural deficiency in this regard, not just thumbs. [The reason for it could be that imitation of form is easier than imitation of function, or it might be a consequence of copying the Shadow Children, who also abandoned their tools. Maybe with more tool-using humans around nowadays, the abos will get better over time. But I digress. These detailed speculations are not germane to the issue of VRT's mention of Dollo's Law.] So why does he mention Dollo's Law? He is making an analogy between evolution and his learning to write. Because the condition of his thumb (or, as I suggested, the neural networks giving fine muscle control over its use) is analogous to the vestigial leg-bones of the snakes. They will not learn to walk by developing these vestigial traits, but by developing some other organ, e.g. the scales. VRT will not learn to write by developing the use of his thumb, but by developing a new way of holding the pen with his fingers. As an anthropologist, or the imitation of one, evolutionary analogies come naturally to him. That is all there is to it. Note, incidentally, that whatever one's interpretation of Dollo's Law, it is clearly linked to his writing. It follows directly from a discussion of it, and then there is a section break before he discusses the location of his cell and is then reminded of the mysterious brass implement. > And, of course, the obvious question: why does an Abo know about an > obscure evolutionary > principle postulated by some Belgian guy on earth in 1890 and connect it > to his handwriting? > Sound more like something an anthropologist would know about. If a minute > portion of the > brain's wiring can be imitated surely a thumb can be. Seem to be serious > doubt over whether > Dr. Marsch really has been replaced. There are a lot of cats about. > Perhaps one bit his hand. If we are going to have a novel involving a shapechanging alien who copies a human, we are going to have to swallow a small camel or two (which does not mean we have licence to swallow herds of them wholesale). By some means, unlikely as it may seem, VRT has come to not only somewhat resemble Marsch in outward appearance, but also pose with some success as a professional anthropologist. Perhaps he has gleaned the knowledge from any texts Marsch brought with him, and from public libraries. Perhaps there is also some psychic transmission of knowledge from the original to the copy; they were in contact for a long period. It is not necessary to be an anthropologist to know of Dollo's Law - Gene Wolfe knows of it, for one. - Gerry Quinn --- ### António Pedro Marques *05 Jan 2011, 13:55 · in reply to Lee Berman* Lee Berman wrote (03-01-2011 03:34): > Still, some feel that the general disrepair of both St. Croix and Ste. > Anne is due to the serviceable but sub-standard tool use of the current > inhabitants. Ha. I'm beginning to think the abos may have travelled back to Earth... ---