{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/5870",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 5870,
    "subject": "interview quesstions",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2011-01-04T16:31:59+00:00",
    "last": "2011-01-04T16:31:59+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<SNT123-w460605CD41974ABFAA0127CF080@phx.gbl>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Lee Berman",
        "address": "severiansola at hotmail.com"
      },
      "date": "2011-01-04T16:31:59+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) interview quesstions",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "Before the Wolfe interview quote there was a significant camp who argued that there \nwas no conclusive evidence  that Dr. Marsch was replaced (Tony were you among them?)."
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "Tony Ellis- No, I was in the camp that pointed out that none of the other theories were \nvery good."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": " \n \nLMAO! Funny. So this is a roundabout way of saying....what? People who thought there was \nhuman replacement were not good Wolfe readers? Wolfe is not a good Wolfe reader? Wolfe\nlied or was confused in his interview?\n \nOr are you now saying that even the theory of Marsch not being replaced is no good. So\n5HoC is not a good book? Or it is a good book filled with nothing but bad evidence? Surely\nyou can admit that what satifies you as a good theory is not going to be the same thing\nwhich satifies others as a good theory, yes?\n \nTony, you have a long history of refusing to pin yourself down to anything and subject \nyourself to criticism.  But I admit that even recognizing this, you have confused me here\non your stance or lack of one. Is there any hope?\n \n \nSo let's try this one. "
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "There is evidence to *support* two different theories about\nthe Shadow Children (and even there, I think the evidence for one side\nis much stronger than the other)."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": " \n \nWhich of the two Shadow Children theories is much stronger and why? \t\t \t   \t\t  "
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}