weak theories The Urth list — 3 messages, 2 voices, 06 Jan 2011 https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/5875 Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. ============================================================================== Lee Berman — 06 Jan 2011, 20:50 > Marc Aramini: One tactic Borski employs frequently that I think is a huge wasted effort is the embedded names Amen on that, my brother! Generally I think Borski is a very smart, very literate guy with a great familiarity with Gene Wolfe. I think he takes a number of wrong steps here and there, but devoting something like 50 pages of his book to the "Onomastics" of how every name of every person and thing in BotNS is related to every other name was an intense race to oblivion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Son of Witz — 06 Jan 2011, 21:08 in reply to Lee Berman > On Jan 6, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Lee Berman wrote: > > Marc Aramini: One tactic Borski employs frequently that I think is a huge wasted effort is the embedded names > Amen on that, my brother! > > Generally I think Borski is a very smart, very literate guy with a great familiarity with Gene Wolfe. I think he > takes a number of wrong steps here and there, but devoting something like 50 pages of his book to the "Onomastics" > of how every name of every person and thing in BotNS is related to every other name was an intense race to oblivion. +1 I started that chapter keenly, but got exaclty zero useful insight. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lee Berman — 06 Jan 2011, 21:14 follows, by subject match Son of Witz > David Stockhoff- This is something I had not imagined. I wonder: if Gene Wolfe crashlanded on a planet > of mind-imitators, what kind of civilization would result? Discuss. > I think everyone would go around making jokes referring to Golden Age pulp, quoting Proust, and talking > about gods as though they were real. Mentioning Gondwanaland and Mu in casual conversation would be nothing. Sorry I had to change subject lines on you for that one David! But funny. Speaking of Golden Age Pulp, is anyone familiar with an SF short story which features an alien planet populated by "Imitians"? I couldn't find it with Google. I suspect it (like Men Without Bones) influenced 5HoC though Imitians are actually the opposite of abos/Shadow Children They are incredible at technology and rapid change but lack any imagination of their own. So when a Bible-toting spaceman crashes on their planet, the whole place is soon populated by a parade of Moseses and Jesuses and so on. But a visiting anthropologist learns that there are also a lot of Pharaoahs and Judases and other assorted sinners. Not everyone identifies with the heroes. *Spoiler Conclusion* The CIA or equivalent sends the Imitians a purposefully contrived book about a mighty conquering race who subjugate and exploit an inferior race who are humbly grateful for the guidance the superior race provides. Hey, why not squeeze these pliable guys and their technology and rapid industry for all we can? Oops. Not everyone identifies with the humble loser in a story either. Earth didn't fare well as a result. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------