GW and Star Trek
The Urth list — 6 messages, 5 voices, 21 Feb 2011
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/5981
Stuart Hamm21 Feb 2011, 23:10
I assume that most have you have seen the Star Trek episode (original series) "For the World is hollow, and I have touched the Sky"..you know...the one about the ruler of a dying planet who hollowed out an asteroid, put the citizens of the the dying world into it to be sent to another star system...of course, they don't know that they are inside an asteroid, and worship the ruler of the old planet (and creator of the the ship/asteroid) who has saved his identity in the ships computer and appears via a solar themed computer. for which a religion has blossomed...
???????? ? ?
?Hmmm...
? ??
Greg Bates22 Feb 2011, 02:22
↳ in reply to Stuart Hamm
Not to mention the "Darmok" episode always seemed cribbed from the Ascians to me.
5 quoted lines
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Stuart Hamm <hammstu at sbcglobal.net> wrote: I assume that most have you have seen the Star Trek episode (original series) "For the World is hollow, and I have touched the Sky"..you know...the one about the ruler of a dying planet who hollowed out an asteroid, put the citizens of the the dying world into it to be sent to another star system...of course, they don't know that they are inside an asteroid, and worship the ruler of the old planet (and creator of the the ship/asteroid) who has saved his identity in the ships computer and appears via a solar themed computer. for which a religion has blossomed...
Hmmm...
_______________________________________________
Son Of Witz23 Feb 2011, 05:38
↳ in reply to Stuart Hamm
4 quoted lines
On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:10 PM, Stuart Hamm wrote:
I assume that most have you have seen the Star Trek episode (original series) "For the World is hollow, and I have touched the Sky"..you know...the one about the ruler of a dying planet who hollowed out an asteroid, put the citizens of the the dying world into it to be sent to another star system...of course, they don't know that they are inside an asteroid, and worship the ruler of the old planet (and creator of the the ship/asteroid) who has saved his identity in the ships computer and appears via a solar themed computer. for which a religion has blossomed...
Hmmm...
THIS I gotta see!
good fishing!
~witz
Lee Berman23 Feb 2011, 13:24
↳ follows, by subject match Son Of Witz
2 quoted lines
Stuart Hamm: you know...the one about the ruler of a dying planet who hollowed out an asteroid, put the
citizens of the the dying world into it to be sent to another star system...
Hey, back then, when there was only 4-5 channels to watch, everybody watched Star Trek. If you liked science
fiction you couldn't help but be influenced by it. On the other hand, nobody (in America) was watching Dr. Who
in the late 60's so I agree with those who argue that it wasn't an influence and there are no daleks in BotNS.
Marc Aramini23 Feb 2011, 18:35
↳ in reply to Son Of Witz
4 quoted lines
--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Son Of Witz <sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org> wrote: THIS I gotta see!
good fishing!
~witz
Which reminds me of the wisest thing I ever took from Star Trek: Having a thing, is not nearly so pleasing a thing, as wanting a thing.
The episode is probably not quite as good as it sounds ...
Hey, when I was a little kid I had a super crush on Spock's Wife (or betrothed or whatever), I thought she was very pretty. One day when I was living in Las Vegas a friend came to visit, and he and my girlfriend talked me into crashing a huge Star Trek convention at one of the casinos. I didn't want to, but they just walked in and I followed (hopefully there is a statute of limitations on breaking into an event like that).
Anyway, EVERYBODY from Star Trek was there, and from just about every science fiction show you could imagine. Then I saw the little old lady who was Spock's wife sitting at a table, and I talked to her for a little and I was almost going to say how beautiful she was but I thought better of it. Would that have made her happy or just sad that the time had already passed? For some reason that was way different than meeting Gene Wolfe or Floyd Mayweather, such a different "prime" between a writer, a fighter, and an actress.
Stuart Hamm23 Feb 2011, 19:27
↳ in reply to Marc Aramini
It's not the best episode...the costumes look like something out of "The 5,000 fingers of Dr. T" ..but not as good..
My question is which influence which>>>???
???????? ? ?
? ??
--- On Wed, 2/23/11, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) GW and Star Trek
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Wednesday, February 23, 2011, 10:35 AM
4 quoted lines
--- On Tue, 2/22/11, Son Of Witz <sonofwitz at butcherbaker.org> wrote: THIS I gotta see!
good fishing!
~witz
Which reminds me of the wisest thing I ever took from Star Trek: Having a thing, is not nearly so pleasing a thing, as wanting a thing.
The episode is probably not quite as good as it sounds ...
Hey, when I was a little kid I had a super crush on Spock's Wife (or betrothed or whatever), I thought she was very pretty. One day when I was living in Las Vegas a friend came to visit, and he and my girlfriend talked me into crashing a huge Star Trek convention at one of the casinos. I didn't want to, but they just walked in and I followed (hopefully there is a statute of limitations on breaking into an event like that).
Anyway, EVERYBODY from Star Trek was there, and from just about every science fiction show you could imagine. Then I saw the little old lady who was Spock's wife sitting at a table, and I talked to her for a little and I was almost going to say how beautiful she was but I thought better of it. Would that have made her happy or just sad that the time had already passed? For some reason that was way different than meeting Gene Wolfe or Floyd Mayweather, such a different "prime" between a writer, a fighter, and an actress.
? ? ?
Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.