comic review of Home Fires (cool!)

Daniel Petersen17 Aug 2011, 19:24

http://comiccrits.blogspot.com/2011/08/home-fires-by-gene-wolfe.html This is a very, very cool way to review Wolfe (or anyone!)... -DOJP

Stuart Hamm18 Aug 2011, 22:07

↳ follows, by subject match Daniel Petersen

Nice...reminds me a wee bit of R Crumb's PKD comic.... ???????? ? ? ?Stuart Hamm??| ?Director-Bass ProgramMusicians Institute?| 6752 Hollywood Blvd.,?Hollywood, CA 90028Email??stuarthamm at mi.edu? | ?Tel??323-860-1128 ?Web??mi.edu??? ?? --- On Wed, 8/17/11, Daniel Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote: From: Daniel Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> Subject: (urth) comic review of Home Fires (cool!) To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011, 12:24 PM http://comiccrits.blogspot.com/2011/08/home-fires-by-gene-wolfe.html This is a very, very cool way to review Wolfe (or anyone!)... -DOJP -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

James Wynn19 Aug 2011, 14:08

↳ in reply to Stuart Hamm

Gene's daughter framed this review gifted it to him. J.

Daniel Petersen19 Aug 2011, 14:54

↳ in reply to James Wynn

Cool! How do you come by this information? -DOJP

4 quoted lines

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:08 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote: Gene's daughter framed this review gifted it to him. J. ______________________________**_________________

James Wynn22 Aug 2011, 14:54

↳ in reply to Daniel Petersen

I had forwarded it to her off-list the week before last. I should have posted it on-list as well. An oversight. J

10 quoted lines

On 8/19/2011 9:54 AM, Daniel Petersen wrote: Cool! How do you come by this information? -DOJP On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:08 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com <mailto:crushtv at gmail.com>> wrote: Gene's daughter framed this review gifted it to him. J. _______________________________________________

Daniel Petersen22 Aug 2011, 15:07

↳ in reply to James Wynn

Ah, very good. I wonder what he thought of it. -DOJP

13 quoted lines · 1–2 deep

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote: I had forwarded it to her off-list the week before last. I should have posted it on-list as well. An oversight. J On 8/19/2011 9:54 AM, Daniel Petersen wrote: Cool! How do you come by this information? -DOJP On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:08 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:

Gene's daughter framed this review gifted it to him. J. _______________________________________________

James Wynn22 Aug 2011, 17:01

↳ in reply to Daniel Petersen

He seemed pleased in the photo.

20 quoted lines · 1–2 deep

On 8/22/2011 10:07 AM, Daniel Petersen wrote: Ah, very good. I wonder what he thought of it. -DOJP On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com <mailto:crushtv at gmail.com>> wrote: I had forwarded it to her off-list the week before last. I should have posted it on-list as well. An oversight. On 8/19/2011 9:54 AM, Daniel Petersen wrote:

Cool! How do you come by this information? -DOJP On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:08 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com <mailto:crushtv at gmail.com>> wrote: Gene's daughter framed this review gifted it to him. _______________________________________________

David Stockhoff07 Oct 2011, 21:33

↳ in reply to James Wynn

There was a photo too? (iterate ad infinitum...)

24 quoted lines · 1–3 deep

On 8/22/2011 1:01 PM, James Wynn wrote: He seemed pleased in the photo. On 8/22/2011 10:07 AM, Daniel Petersen wrote:

Ah, very good. I wonder what he thought of it. -DOJP On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:54 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com <mailto:crushtv at gmail.com>> wrote: I had forwarded it to her off-list the week before last. I should have posted it on-list as well. An oversight. On 8/19/2011 9:54 AM, Daniel Petersen wrote:

_______________________________________________

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.