Seal of Pas The Urth list — 10 messages, 5 voices, 28 Oct 2011 https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/6092 Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. ============================================================================== Lee Berman — 28 Oct 2011, 13:04 Gerry Quinn: >Gerry Quinn: Bah, it’s just a credit card type number. The only point is it has low entropy, > but it doesn’t encode anything. Stop thinking everything is overloaded with significance Ack!!! now I am issuing orders to myself! I think you forgot to add "Humbug!" Gerry. > Marc Aramini: After messing with it for a while, it very well might be something of that sort. I don't think failure to solve is good enough evidence to dismiss this mystery. Not this one. The numbers are given to us right in the text in a unique arrangement and Silk makes the sign of addition over them. Where else does Wolfe do something like this? How could it not be significant? I've messed with it quite a bit over the past few years myself with no success though some of my attempts were interesting. For a long while I was trying the cryptograph puzzle technique that Wolfe introduced in 5HoC. No success. Now, my best guess is that there is an association to the connection that Revelation makes between the Seventh Seal and the 12 Tribes of Israel. When that Seal is broken, at the second coming of Christ, representatives from the 12 Tribes who have been long sealed away, will appear in two groups of 144,000 to repopulate the earth after the Armageddon. (slight variant interpretations exist) The Pas seal being broken and stored Urth bodies being released to the Whorl seems awfully similar to the Bible story. But so far I haven't been able to add the numbers grouped in a way that produces the significant number. I've even used the warped math that Maytera Rose gives us in the first chapter of Nightside but no success yet. Perhaps someone else can do it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gerry Quinn — 28 Oct 2011, 15:07 in reply to Lee Berman From: Lee Berman > > > Gerry Quinn: Bah, it’s just a credit card type number. The only point is it has low entropy, > > > but it doesn’t encode anything. Stop thinking everything is overloaded with significance > > Marc Aramini: After messing with it for a while, it very well might be something of that sort. > I don't think failure to solve is good enough evidence to dismiss this mystery. Not this one. The > numbers are given to us right in the text in a unique arrangement and Silk makes the sign of addition > over them. Where else does Wolfe do something like this? How could it not be significant? How could they *not* be in a unique arrangement? And Silk would have done the same regardless of the numbers. > From a naturalistic perspective, the numbers shouldn’t have any significance that we would understand in the story: they should encode the contents and/or date of storage, serial numbers etc. Random numbers would not look realistic in such a context, so Wolfe doesn’t use them — he uses numbers that look compatible with such a meaning. If they have a deeper significance, it is a game that Wolfe is playing with his readers, and he hasn’t set it up very well. - Gerry Quinn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ James Wynn — 28 Oct 2011, 15:35 in reply to Gerry Quinn > On 10/28/2011 10:07 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote: > How could they *not* be in a unique arrangement? Horn and Nettle could have related that Silk saw a seal with a series of numbers. The fact that they related those precise numbers could imply that Silk told them what the numbers were, and that he could precisely recall them. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gerry Quinn — 28 Oct 2011, 15:43 in reply to James Wynn From: James Wynn > On 10/28/2011 10:07 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote: > > How could they *not* be in a unique arrangement? > Horn and Nettle could have related that Silk saw a seal with a series of > numbers. The fact that they related those precise numbers could imply > that Silk told them what the numbers were, and that he could precisely > recall them. Or that Horn and Nettle made them up. They can’t know every detail that is related anyway. I agree that Wolfe had the option of not citing specific numbers, and that the citing of numbers opens the possibility that they have some secret extra-narrative significance. But they don’t have to be significant. - Gerry Quinn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gwern Branwen — 28 Oct 2011, 16:06 in reply to Gerry Quinn > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote: > From a naturalistic perspective, the numbers shouldn’t have any significance > that we would understand in the story: they should encode the contents > and/or date of storage, serial numbers etc. It has been a while, but wasn't there just one sequence of numbers which made up a Seal of Pas? If the sequence doesn't change, then none of those 3 suggestions would work (serial numbers which don't change are not useful; it's unlikely that every single chamber would have been sealed at the same time (especially since a datestamp that big ought to be accurate down to really small units like nanoseconds) or would have the same contents). The Seal is a little frustrating; I had tried looking at it as ASCII and, I think, an EBCDIC, but nothing popped out. -- gwern http://www.gwern.net/Suzanne%20Delage ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lee Berman — 28 Oct 2011, 17:03 follows, by subject match Gwern Branwen > Gerry Quinn: How could they *not* be in a unique arrangement? > Gerry Quinn: I agree that Wolfe had the option of not citing specific numbers Yes, you have answered your own question. And Wolfe most often takes that route relying on a description of "gnostic" or "teratoid" symbols non-specific adjectives to convey to his readers that the protagonist is seeing symbols he (and we) are not expected to understand the specifics of, only the nature of. > the citing of numbers opens the possibility that they have some secret extra-narrative > significance. But they don’t have to be significant. Well, this is literature. Nothing *has* to be anything. But Wolfe's departure from his usual way of describing alien symbols seems pretty significant to me. > If they have a deeper significance, it is a game that Wolfe is playing with his readers, > and he hasn’t set it up very well. This wouldn't be the first example of that. UotNS was not planned when Wolfe wrote BotNS. Therefore Wolfe expected all the mystery solutions revealed in UotNS to be soluble without that book. But they aren't. At least not by the readers who have published their interpretations in books or online. Plus we have the example of whether VRT replaced Dr. Marsch. Hotly debated until Gene Wolfe set the record straight in two separate interviews. > Gwern Branwen: It has been a while, but wasn't there just one sequence of numbers > which made up a Seal of Pas? Yes. But there was mention by Hammerstone of many other seals which had already been broken. A random serial number doesn't make sense for Wolfe to devote this much attention to. I think it has some sort of Earthly or perhaps Urthly significance that we are supposed to figure out. I still think the Bible and the Seventh Seal and the 12 x 12,0000 Tribes of Israel is a likely suspect. Perhaps not to be ignored is that there are words also. 5553 8783 4223 9700 34 2221 0401 1101 7276 56 SEALED FOR THE MONARCH ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gerry Quinn — 28 Oct 2011, 17:18 in reply to Gwern Branwen From: Gwern Branwen > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote: > > From a naturalistic perspective, the numbers shouldn’t have any significance > > that we would understand in the story: they should encode the contents > > and/or date of storage, serial numbers etc. > It has been a while, but wasn't there just one sequence of numbers > which made up a Seal of Pas? If the sequence doesn't change, then none > of those 3 suggestions would work (serial numbers which don't change > are not useful; it's unlikely that every single chamber would have > been sealed at the same time (especially since a datestamp that big > ought to be accurate down to really small units like nanoseconds) or > would have the same contents). We are only told the sequence on one such seal. I think we are to infer that all the seals are different. Silk later finds the dust from a broken seal of a cabinet that had contained human embryos, but he does not encounter, or at least doesn’t notice, any other intact seals. The seal had about 36 digits. I just interpret it as the equivalent of a barcode; we don’t know what information was on it but we can guess what *kind* of information was there. - Gerry Quinn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ David Stockhoff — 28 Oct 2011, 17:40 in reply to Gerry Quinn > On 10/28/2011 1:18 PM, Gerry Quinn wrote: > *From:* Gwern Branwen > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Gerry Quinn wrote: > > > From a naturalistic perspective, the numbers shouldn’t have any > > > significance > > > that we would understand in the story: they should encode the contents > > > and/or date of storage, serial numbers etc. > > It has been a while, but wasn't there just one sequence of numbers > > which made up a Seal of Pas? If the sequence doesn't change, then none > > of those 3 suggestions would work (serial numbers which don't change > > are not useful; it's unlikely that every single chamber would have > > been sealed at the same time (especially since a datestamp that big > > ought to be accurate down to really small units like nanoseconds) or > > would have the same contents). > We are only told the sequence on one such seal. I think we are to > infer that all the seals are different. Silk later finds the dust from > a broken seal of a cabinet that had contained human embryos, but he > does not encounter, or at least doesn’t notice, any other intact seals. > The seal had about 36 digits. I just interpret it as the equivalent of > a barcode; we don’t know what information was on it but we can guess > what *kind* of information was there. > - Gerry Quinn It strikes me that a large part of the number's "significance" is that it is a sign of "our" era and of computer-generated IDs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gerry Quinn — 28 Oct 2011, 17:44 in reply to Lee Berman From: Lee Berman > > Gerry Quinn: How could they *not* be in a unique arrangement? > > Gerry Quinn: I agree that Wolfe had the option of not citing specific numbers > Yes, you have answered your own question. And Wolfe most often takes that route > relying on a description of "gnostic" or "teratoid" symbols non-specific adjectives > to convey to his readers that the protagonist is seeing symbols he (and we) are > not expected to understand the specifics of, only the nature of. And if he next turns his hand to rewriting BotNS as a graphic novel, what will he do then? He will draw appropriate symbols, I think. In text, however, it is easy to cite numbers, while it is hard to describe such a teratoid symbol exactly. So it is not surprising that they do not. > > If they have a deeper significance, it is a game that Wolfe is playing with his readers, > > and he hasn’t set it up very well. > This wouldn't be the first example of that. UotNS was not planned when Wolfe wrote BotNS. > Therefore Wolfe expected all the mystery solutions revealed in UotNS to be soluble without > that book. But they aren't. At least not by the readers who have published their interpretations > in books or online. Plus we have the example of whether VRT replaced Dr. Marsch. Hotly debated > until Gene Wolfe set the record straight in two separate interviews. Those seem like a different kind of puzzle (if you want to use that term). > > Gwern Branwen: It has been a while, but wasn't there just one sequence of numbers > > which made up a Seal of Pas? > Yes. But there was mention by Hammerstone of many other seals which had already been > broken. A random serial number doesn't make sense for Wolfe to devote this much attention > to. He didn’t devote all that much attention to it. He used three lines to illustrate the nature of the seal. A lot less than is devoted to Maytera Marble’s lamb chops, or the technology of taluses. > I think it has some sort of Earthly or perhaps Urthly significance that we are supposed > to figure out. I still think the Bible and the Seventh Seal and the 12 x 12,0000 Tribes of > Israel is a likely suspect. Perhaps not to be ignored is that there are words also. > > 5553 8783 4223 9700 34 > 2221 0401 1101 7276 56 > SEALED FOR THE MONARCH Words with a fairly obvious interpretation. (I suppose one could consider them as suggesting that Typhon will return, but the interpretation that the vaults were sealed under his orders works fine too.) One could also argue that there is a hidden meaning attached to the numbers being meaningless, combined with Silk’s reverent reaction to them. If the numbers were meaningful, Silk would be responding to a true deity, his author, and so his reverence would be appropriate. - Gerry Quinn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gerry Quinn — 28 Oct 2011, 18:20 in reply to David Stockhoff From: David Stockhoff > It strikes me that a large part of the number's "significance" is that > it is a sign of "our" era and of computer-generated IDs. Yes, that too: or at least it symbolises the technological society of Typhon’s era, rather than the post-technological society of the Whorl in its current state. - Gerry Quinn ------------------------------------------------------------------------------