Malrubius ghost

The Urth list — 3 messages, 3 voices, 07 Nov 2011
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/6101

larry miller07 Nov 2011, 00:57
Looking over the Gevers interview (Magus of many suns) earlier and intrigued by one of Wolfes comments. He is asked "Does Silk/Horn take an active part via astral projection in the events of BotNS? Specifically as the "ghost" of Malrubius?" Wolfe replies "Yes but not a leading part." What does everyone make of this? Does anyone think that Silk/Horn makes appearances in the New Sun books? What about Malrubius being an Aquastor? Is that still valid?
António Pedro Marques07 Nov 2011, 01:34

↳ in reply to larry miller

No dia 07/11/2011, ?s 00:57, larry miller <biglar1984 at gmail.com> escreveu:
1 quoted line
Looking over the Gevers interview (Magus of many suns) earlier and intrigued by one of Wolfes comments. He is asked "Does Silk/Horn take an active part via astral projection in the events of BotNS? Specifically as the "ghost" of Malrubius?" Wolfe replies "Yes but not a leading part."
Mmmmmm. To me, an answer like that suggests GW knows very well what lies deep inside the layers of the story that are inaccessible to us. I think his reply to Marc is to be taken seriously, as is the answer about Blue+Green. And possible the interview where he says something in apparent contradiction to 5HC.
Nick Lee07 Nov 2011, 02:45

↳ follows, by subject match António Pedro Marques

1 quoted line
Looking over the Gevers interview (Magus of many suns) earlier andintrigued by one of Wolfes comments. “He is asked "Does Silk/Horn takean active >part via astral projection in the events of BotNS?Specifically as the "ghost" of Malrubius?" ?Wolfe replies "Yes but nota leading part." ?What does everyone >make of this” Does anyone thinkthat Silk/Horn makes appearances in the New Sun books? “What aboutMalrubius being an Aquastor” “Is that still valid”
Just taking a quick look through New Sun, I'd say pg. 77 of Shadow and Claw is the only plausible one, unless Severian is mistaken or the Rajan lying to him on the other occasions. Now, if he was ignoring the last part of the question, more possibilities open up.

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.