Five Dog Knight, aka Casting Couch

Alice Turner14 May 1998, 07:43original

Okay, there seems to be a consensus on Sir John as Palaemon. Can we then give Malrubius to Sir Alec and Old Valeria to Dame Maggie? And is Sir Ralph still with us?--he could be memorable as the somewhat slimy Gurloes. And Sir Derek IS the Autarch--I could kick myself for overlooking him even as a momentary lapse. (The Brightest Stars in the Aristocratic Firmament Set This Epic Adventure Ablaze.) But fie on the foul felon who proposed Nicholas Cage as Silk. That's a terrible idea. Everybody loves Silk. Does everybody love Nick Cage? Does anybody love Nick Cage? I'm sure O'Leary will back me up when I put myself 100% behind Leo, Leo, Leo. -alga-

Peter Stephenson14 May 1998, 12:10original

↳ follows, by subject match Alice Turner

3 quoted lines

"Alice Turner" wrote: And is Sir Ralph still with us?--he could be memorable as the somewhat slimy Gurloes.

Alas not, so he'd better be Malrubius :-) That reminds me, I missed out two from my anti-list Malrubius: Leslie Nielsen Triskele: ALF

1 quoted line

(The Brightest Stars in the Aristocratic Firmament Set This Epic Adventure Ablaze.)

Well, more sort of `knightly' rather than `aristocratic'. If Larry were still around, he could do a cameo of the Pancreator, say. Maybe you could hire a stately home for the House Absolute. Chatsworth would do. pws

Peter Westlake14 May 1998, 11:12original

↳ follows, by subject match Peter Stephenson

2 quoted lines

At 07:43 1998-05-14 -0400, alga wrote: But fie on the foul felon who proposed Nicholas Cage as Silk. That's a terrible idea.

It is, isn't it? Mind you, Sissy Spacek as Dorcas was a bit off, too :-) Mucor, I grant you. As for the Hitchhiker's Guide - but that's a Long Sun idea, and a very silly one too. I shall post it to Whorl instead. It's been rather quiet lately. -- Spectacled bear. Peter Westlake, Harlequin Ltd, Barrington Hall, Barrington, Cambs CB2 5RG.

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.