proposed `Delage' collage for NYRSF

Damien Broderick16 May 1998, 12:16original

Hi team I've just suggested this to one of the editors at the New York Review of SF, and would like to hear from the relevant list posters if it's cool to snaffle their glittering words, with acknowledgement: < I've lately been on the URTH email list, devoted to Book of the New Sun and other non Long Sun Wolfeana. Very smart, funny, divergent minds. One minor thread has tried to work out what's going on in Wolfe's quite short story, `Suzanne Delage'. I'd like to create a kind of collage of the posts-to-date as an article. Obviously I'd get permission from the contestants. > I would guess that they'd want to see it (or samples) before accepting it on my say-so, but I'll take the chance and do the compiling, unless anyone objects. Regards, Damien

Peter Westlake18 May 1998, 07:44original

↳ follows, by subject match Damien Broderick

6 quoted lines

At 12:16 1998-05-16 +0000, Damien wrote: Hi team I've just suggested this to one of the editors at the New York Review of SF, and would like to hear from the relevant list posters if it's cool to snaffle their glittering words, with acknowledgement: < I've lately been on the URTH email list, devoted to Book of the New Sun and other non Long Sun Wolfeana. Very smart, funny, divergent minds. One minor thread has tried to work out what's going on in Wolfe's quite short story, `Suzanne Delage'. I'd like to create a kind of collage of the posts-to-date as an article. Obviously I'd get permission from the contestants. >

Contestants?

1 quoted line

I would guess that they'd want to see it (or samples) before accepting it on my say-so, but I'll take the chance and do the compiling, unless anyone objects.

Fine by me, though you might want to snip email addresses. Peter.

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.