This Week in Google Alerts: one-line summaries

The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 09 Jan 2013
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/6340

Gwern Branwen09 Jan 2013, 00:40
http://bookstove.com/science-fiction/book-review-gene-wolfe-the-claw-of-the-conciliator/
1 quoted line
The hero eats his dead girlfriend and gives an ape back its severed hand as the journey continues.
Nah, I'm kidding, it's a real review:
1 quoted line
There is much debate as to whether Wolfe’s best-known quartet is science fiction or fantasy. It has rockets (mostly serving as buildings), time travellers, and androids, as well as laser rifles. Yet it also has monsters, prophesies, a man (Severian), who may be able to resurrect the dead as well as execute criminals with Terminus Est. To me, the work is fantasy, as much of the SF element seems decayed and archaic in a world where the magic is seen as more important. In any interpretation, it carries some of the genre’s finest writing.
Also, http://buenogato.wordpress.com/2012/12/30/the-shadow-of-the-torturer/
3 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
The Shadow of the Torturer, filled as it is with strange incident and wonderful language, is really the story of boyhood into manhood, told by a man who claims to have perfect memory. At least, that’s the skeleton of it. This book takes place, it seems, far in the future. This is never explicitly stated in fact, much that’s vital never is. Wolfe is an absolute master of subtlety. For instance, Severian comes across this painting, among others:
?[It] showed an armored figure standing in a desolate landscape. It had no weapon, but held a staff bearing a strange, stiff banner. The visor of this figure’s helmet was entirely of gold, without eye slits or ventilation; in its polished surface the deathly desert could be seen in reflection, but nothing more.
Savvy you may have already discerned that this is a picture of an astronaut. I did not, until I stumbled across that fact in some critical commentary on the book. Delights like these pepper the book, and the meanings of more seemingly obscure points (who is Severian’s mother?) are still debated.
gwern http://www.gwern.net
Antonin Scriabin09 Jan 2013, 00:50

↳ in reply to Gwern Branwen

I think TBOTNS is a great example of books that demonstrate the silliness of taking an either / or approach to genres.
15 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
On Jan 8, 2013 7:40 PM, "Gwern Branwen" <gwern0 at gmail.com> wrote: http://bookstove.com/science-fiction/book-review-gene-wolfe-the-claw-of-the-conciliator/
The hero eats his dead girlfriend and gives an ape back its severed hand as the journey continues.
Nah, I'm kidding, it's a real review:
There is much debate as to whether Wolfe’s best-known quartet is science fiction or fantasy. It has rockets (mostly serving as buildings), time travellers, and androids, as well as laser rifles. Yet it also has monsters, prophesies, a man (Severian), who may be able to resurrect the dead as well as execute criminals with Terminus Est. To me, the work is fantasy, as much of the SF element seems decayed and archaic in a world where the magic is seen as more important. In any interpretation, it carries some of the genre’s finest writing.
The Shadow of the Torturer, filled as it is with strange incident and wonderful language, is really the story of boyhood into manhood, told by a man who claims to have perfect memory. At least, that’s the skeleton of it.
This book takes place, it seems, far in the future. This is never explicitly stated in fact, much that’s vital never is. Wolfe is an absolute master of subtlety. For instance, Severian comes across this painting, among others:
?[It] showed an armored figure standing in a desolate landscape. It had no weapon, but held a staff bearing a strange, stiff banner. The visor of this figure’s helmet was entirely of gold, without eye slits or ventilation; in its polished surface the deathly desert could be seen in reflection, but nothing more.
Savvy you may have already discerned that this is a picture of an astronaut. I did not, until I stumbled across that fact in some critical commentary on the book. Delights like these pepper the book, and the meanings of more seemingly obscure points (who is Severian’s mother?) are still debated.
-- gwern http://www.gwern.net _______________________________________________

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.