Any Pynchon Fans?
The Urth list — 5 messages, 4 voices, 19 Aug 2013
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/6420
Christopher Simon19 Aug 2013, 21:52
Are there any other Pynchon fans on the list? His 8th novel, Bleeding Edge, comes out September 17th. He and Mr. Wolfe are probably my two favorite authors, and they both have new books coming out this Fall. I am a happy camper!
David Duffy19 Aug 2013, 23:22
↳ in reply to Christopher Simon
2 quoted lines
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Christopher Simon wrote:
Are there any other Pynchon fans on the list?
Yes, I like him (hey, I even contributed to the Inherent Vice wiki once ;)), and he has been previously discussed here. There are certain parallels with Wolfe, though no direct allusions AFAIK (cf Neal Stephenson, for example).
Cheers, David Duffy.
Decanus128420 Aug 2013, 00:15
↳ follows, by subject match David Duffy
I remember when I was reading V I tried to approach the mystery surrounding the title characters identity in the same fashion I read Wolfe.
T-Mobile, America's First Nationwide 4G Network
-------- Original message --------
Subject: (urth) Any Pynchon Fans?
From: Christopher Simon <kierkegaurdian at gmail.com>
Marc Aramini20 Aug 2013, 00:22
↳ in reply to Decanus1284
I think Pynchon is decidedly more postmodern - when things fall apart they tend not to come together again. Scatophages(i?), giant octopi, erections summoning death from above ... I like Gravity's Rainbow but am currently perennially half way through Against The Day - his hippie economic sensibilities in that one seem a bit off putting.
I think in the final analysis the kind of interpretations I try on Wolfe would not by and large work on the more chaotic and decentralized Pynchon.
Sent from my iPhone
9 quoted lines
On Aug 19, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Decanus1284 <decanus1284 at gmail.com> wrote:
I remember when I was reading V I tried to approach the mystery surrounding the title characters identity in the same fashion I read Wolfe.
T-Mobile, America's First Nationwide 4G Network
-------- Original message --------
Subject: (urth) Any Pynchon Fans?
From: Christopher Simon <kierkegaurdian at gmail.com>
Christopher Simon20 Aug 2013, 12:30
↳ follows, by subject match Marc Aramini
Pynchon is definitely more scattered and difficult to interpret, insofar as interpretation is possible with his books. That said, latter-day Pynchon (Mason and Dixon, Inherent Vice, and Against the Day) is much more formal and enjoyable in storytelling aspects than GR-era Pynchon. Fewer hallucinatory adenoids and more emotionally interesting characters and adventure, I guess.
-----Original Message-----
From: "Marc Aramini" <marcaramini at yahoo.com>
Sent: ?8/?19/?2013 8:22 PM
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Subject: Re: (urth) Any Pynchon Fans?
I think Pynchon is decidedly more postmodern - when things fall apart they tend not to come together again. Scatophages(i?), giant octopi, erections summoning death from above ... I like Gravity's Rainbow but am currently perennially half way through Against The Day - his hippie economic sensibilities in that one seem a bit off putting.
I think in the final analysis the kind of interpretations I try on Wolfe would not by and large work on the more chaotic and decentralized Pynchon.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 19, 2013, at 5:15 PM, Decanus1284 <decanus1284 at gmail.com> wrote:
I remember when I was reading V I tried to approach the mystery surrounding the title characters identity in the same fashion I read Wolfe.
T-Mobile, America's First Nationwide 4G Network
-------- Original message --------
Subject: (urth) Any Pynchon Fans?
From: Christopher Simon <kierkegaurdian at gmail.com>
To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
CC:
Are there any other Pynchon fans on the list? His 8th novel, Bleeding Edge, comes out September 17th. He and Mr. Wolfe are probably my two favorite authors, and they both have new books coming out this Fall. I am a happy camper!
Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.