{ "export": { "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/6426", "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.", "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'" }, "archive": "urth", "thread": { "id": 6426, "subject": "silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "messages": 39, "voices": 10, "first": "2013-08-24T15:45:47+00:00", "last": "2013-08-30T11:31:27+00:00" }, "messages": [ { "message_id": "<1377359147.37585.YahooMailNeo@web160705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-24T15:45:47+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": null, "reply_link": null, "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "By now everyone know I actually think Wolfe creates symbols and \"metaphors\" that are actually extremely literal. Thus, Shadow Children riding Marshmen is the same as Shadow Children riding a man named Marsch (his name is misspelled in my copy as Marsh in the title \"A Story by John V Marsh\", which I feel might be intentional even if changed in later editions by copy editors).\n\nI've always felt that Silk felt particularly manipulated, and that this prompted his suicidal thoughts. Kypris is equated with mother, Hyacinth, and Mamelta in his dreams. I want to talk about the dancing toy that his mother makes move for him - I think this is a symbol of Silk, and that \"mother\" calls the shots. When he is enlightened, that female dove voice he hears has always resonated, in my mind, with Kypris, and when mamelta is awakened I have always posited that her claim, \"We will be lovers\" is not from Mucor (who was insistent that no sex with Silk would occur in their first meeting) but actually from somewhere else.\n\nIt is Mother who makes the little toy dance, it is Kypris who calls Silk to join with her and Typhon in mainframe, it is Kypris in Hyacinth that compels Silk to love a prostitute at first, and I think it is Kypris' voice in the enlightenment (which can have a physical cause and still be serving the Outsider, just as the castle in the sky is a tent full of hot air in New Sun - it has a physical cause, even though Crane's explanation seems absurd, training us NOT to look for it). \n\nI think that the rather odd naming of the dogs in the tunnels as gods is indicative of exactly what it implies literally: the gods are in the tunnels - the sleepers behind the seals of Pas. Before his probably suicide attempt, Silk indicates that he is aware of his origins now and that he learned them in the time down below. While we can say this is just a statement about humanity and the whorl, I think it is personal - he realizes that the things which control him (Mother Kypris) are using him like that dancing toy, that his enlightenment might be spurious and predetermined in that gnostic universe (how quickly the chalk of Silk for Calde goes up after his enlightenment - I've always felt this overdetermined beginning is part of that \"clock work figure\" of Silk and the whorl. He realizes that he has very little freedom and it is all set up. However, Mamelta is swallowed by the giant fish, and I think this too is a symbol - that Kypris is\n subsumed by something far greater than herself, so that the englightenment, which Silk misinterprets at least once and possibly twice, serves the Outsider in the final analysis even if Pas and Kypris, the male and female voice, set it up as the spark that would start their little clockwork plan in motion, like the dancing toy controlled by Mother." } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Daniel Otto Jack Petersen", "address": "danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-24T17:12:55+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377359147.37585.YahooMailNeo@web160705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "'He realizes that he has very little freedom and it is all set up.\nHowever, Mamelta is swallowed by the giant fish, and I think this too is a\nsymbol - that Kypris is subsumed by something far greater than herself, so\nthat the englightenment, which Silk misinterprets at least once and\npossibly twice, serves the Outsider in the final analysis even if Pas and\nKypris, the male and female voice, set it up as the spark that would start\ntheir little clockwork plan in motion, like the dancing toy controlled by\nMother.'\n\nI think I agree with this. I don't think that Silk being shown in various\nways to be a 'clockwork figure' is meant to convey that he definitely is\nand always will be. I think it indicates that *some* forces have that in\nmind for him as part of their master plan, but that the Outsider actually\nliberates Silk out of this simplistic pre-determinism into a responsive\nsort of agency as part of a 'greater plan' than the schemes of gods\nontologically 'smaller' than the Outsider." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marc Aramini wrote:\nBy now everyone know I actually think Wolfe creates symbols and\n\"metaphors\" that are actually extremely literal. Thus, Shadow Children\nriding Marshmen is the same as Shadow Children riding a man named Marsch\n(his name is misspelled in my copy as Marsh in the title \"A Story by John V\nMarsh\", which I feel might be intentional even if changed in later editions\nby copy editors).\n\nI've always felt that Silk felt particularly manipulated, and that this\nprompted his suicidal thoughts. Kypris is equated with mother, Hyacinth,\nand Mamelta in his dreams. I want to talk about the dancing toy that his\nmother makes move for him - I think this is a symbol of Silk, and that\n\"mother\" calls the shots. When he is enlightened, that female dove voice\nhe hears has always resonated, in my mind, with Kypris, and when mamelta is\nawakened I have always posited that her claim, \"We will be lovers\" is not\nfrom Mucor (who was insistent that no sex with Silk would occur in their\nfirst meeting) but actually from somewhere else.\n\nIt is Mother who makes the little toy dance, it is Kypris who calls Silk\nto join with her and Typhon in mainframe, it is Kypris in Hyacinth that\ncompels Silk to love a prostitute at first, and I think it is Kypris' voice\nin the enlightenment (which can have a physical cause and still be serving\nthe Outsider, just as the castle in the sky is a tent full of hot air in\nNew Sun - it has a physical cause, even though Crane's explanation seems\nabsurd, training us NOT to look for it).\n\nI think that the rather odd naming of the dogs in the tunnels as gods is\nindicative of exactly what it implies literally: the gods are in the\ntunnels - the sleepers behind the seals of Pas. Before his probably\nsuicide attempt, Silk indicates that he is aware of his origins now and\nthat he learned them in the time down below. While we can say this is just\na statement about humanity and the whorl, I think it is personal - he\nrealizes that the things which control him (Mother Kypris) are using him\nlike that dancing toy, that his enlightenment might be spurious and\npredetermined in that gnostic universe (how quickly the chalk of Silk for\nCalde goes up after his enlightenment - I've always felt this\noverdetermined beginning is part of that \"clock work figure\" of Silk and\nthe whorl. He realizes that he has very little freedom and it is all set\nup. However, Mamelta is swallowed by the giant fish, and I think this too\nis a symbol - that Kypris is subsumed by something far greater than\nherself, so that the englightenment, which Silk misinterprets at least once\nand possibly twice, serves the Outsider in the final analysis even if Pas\nand Kypris, the male and female voice, set it up as the spark that would\nstart their little clockwork plan in motion, like the dancing toy\ncontrolled by Mother.\n\n_______________________________________________" } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "David Duffy", "address": "david.duffy at qimr.edu.au" }, "date": "2013-08-25T22:53:12+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377359147.37585.YahooMailNeo@web160705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, Marc Aramini wrote:\nstart their little clockwork plan in motion" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "And the Wizard Knight, with its rapid collection of plot coupons." } ] }, { "message_id": "<1377526615.86370.YahooMailNeo@web162806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Craig Brewer", "address": "cnbrewer at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-26T14:16:55+00:00", "subject": "(urth) Wolfe's advice to writers, written on his hand", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "http://betweenletters.quora.com/14-Writers-Handwrite-Their-Writing-Advice-on-Their-Hands?ref=fb\n\n\"Start the next one!\"" } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Fred Kiesche", "address": "godelescherbach at gmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-26T14:21:26+00:00", "subject": "(urth) Wolfe's advice to writers, written on his hand", "in_reply_to": "<1377526615.86370.YahooMailNeo@web162806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Excellent stuff. Passed it on to some fans of David Drake as well." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Craig Brewer wrote:\n\nhttp://betweenletters.quora.com/14-Writers-Handwrite-Their-Writing-Advice-on-Their-Hands?ref=fb\n\n\"Start the next one!\"\n\n_______________________________________________\nUrth Mailing List\nTo post, write urth at urth.net" } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Daniel Otto Jack Petersen", "address": "danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-26T15:03:22+00:00", "subject": "(urth) Wolfe's advice to writers, written on his hand", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Yeah, I saw this before. Most of them are pretty good advice.\n\nYou can tell the prolific Mr. Wolfe practices what he preaches!\n\n-DOJP" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Fred Kiesche wrote:\nExcellent stuff. Passed it on to some fans of David Drake as well.\n\nOn Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Craig Brewer wrote:" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 2, "text": "http://betweenletters.quora.com/14-Writers-Handwrite-Their-Writing-Advice-on-Their-Hands?ref=fb\n\n\"Start the next one!\"\n\n_______________________________________________\nUrth Mailing List\nTo post, write urth at urth.net\nSubscription/information: http://www.urth.net" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "--\nF.P. Kiesche III \"Ah Mr. Gibbon, another damned, fat, square book.\nAlways, scribble, scribble, scribble, eh?\" (The Duke of Gloucester, on\nbeing presented with Volume 2 of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.)\nBlogging at The Lensman's Children (\nhttp://theeternalgoldenbraid.blogspot.com/).\n\n\n_______________________________________________" } ] }, { "message_id": "<784CA146-ABB4-4E8A-81E3-AEAFAE3AF3DB@gmail.com>", "from": { "name": "António Pedro Marques", "address": "entonio at gmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T02:51:55+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377359147.37585.YahooMailNeo@web160705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "No dia 24/08/2013, ?s 16:45, Marc Aramini escreveu:" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "I think that the rather odd naming of the dogs in the tunnels as gods " }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Ahh, so I'm not the only only one finding this quite odd. Not that the pun itself is hard to come by - was it you who connected it to 'dog collar', or was it LB or James?), but it's too childish to stand on its own, I think. " }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "is indicative of exactly what it implies literally: the gods are in the tunnels - the sleepers behind the seals of Pas. Before his probably suicide attempt, Silk indicates that he is aware of his origins now and that he learned them in the time down below. While we can say this is just a statement about humanity and the whorl, I think it is personal - he realizes that the things which control him (Mother Kypris) are using him like that dancing toy, that his enlightenment might be spurious and predetermined in that gnostic universe (how quickly the chalk of Silk for Calde goes up after his enlightenment - I've always felt this overdetermined beginning is part of that \"clock work figure\" of Silk and the whorl. He realizes that he has very little freedom and it is all set up." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "There is somewhere Silk says he sometimes doesn't even trust the Outsider. I found that quite interesting. " }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": " However, Mamelta is swallowed by the giant fish" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "A pulp trope, even - have characters vanish without warning just when you thought you'd start knowing a bit more about them." } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T03:08:56+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<784CA146-ABB4-4E8A-81E3-AEAFAE3AF3DB@gmail.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Yes silk doubting the outsider is, I think, because he has come to doubt some feature of his enlightenment or its sincerity( in addition to no doubt questioning how so many bad things can happen - a tired truism, but the oldest problem of men of faith) No, not me with the dog collar - maybe James. I tend to take Wolfe literally at every step to see if there is some way things can actually be as written or symbolize something else.\n\nThere is an odd kind of deciphering in long sun where Wolfe just says things outright (kypris is hyacinth is mamelta is chenille is mother) (because they are all literally possessed by kypris or are her physically, and she is his real mother) and I take the Gods in the tunnels as another one of those instances of just literal statement. There are gods in the tunnels. \n\nSent from my iPhone" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Aug 26, 2013, at 7:51 PM, Ant?nio Pedro Marques wrote:\nNo dia 24/08/2013, ?s 16:45, Marc Aramini escreveu:" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 2, "text": "I think that the rather odd naming of the dogs in the tunnels as gods" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Ahh, so I'm not the only only one finding this quite odd. Not that the pun itself is hard to come by - was it you who connected it to 'dog collar', or was it LB or James?), but it's too childish to stand on its own, I think. " }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 2, "text": "is indicative of exactly what it implies literally: the gods are in the tunnels - the sleepers behind the seals of Pas. Before his probably suicide attempt, Silk indicates that he is aware of his origins now and that he learned them in the time down below. While we can say this is just a statement about humanity and the whorl, I think it is personal - he realizes that the things which control him (Mother Kypris) are using him like that dancing toy, that his enlightenment might be spurious and predetermined in that gnostic universe (how quickly the chalk of Silk for Calde goes up after his enlightenment - I've always felt this overdetermined beginning is part of that \"clock work figure\" of Silk and the whorl. He realizes that he has very little freedom and it is all set up." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "There is somewhere Silk says he sometimes doesn't even trust the Outsider. I found that quite interesting. " }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 2, "text": " However, Mamelta is swallowed by the giant fish" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "A pulp trope, even - have characters vanish without warning just when you thought you'd start knowing a bit more about them.\n\n_______________________________________________" } ] }, { "message_id": "<7F9C69D56DD0457FA644097AD3D07DD5@Rover>", "from": { "name": "Gerry Quinn", "address": "gerry at bindweed.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T11:18:43+00:00", "subject": "(urth) Wolfe's advice to writers, written on his hand", "in_reply_to": "<1377526615.86370.YahooMailNeo@web162806.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "From: Craig Brewer\nhttp://betweenletters.quora.com/14-Writers-Handwrite-Their-Writing-Advice-on-Their-Hands?ref=fb\n\n\nSo Wolfe is left-handed?\n\n\n- Gerry Quinn " } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Gerry Quinn", "address": "gerry at bindweed.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T11:36:40+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "From: Marc Aramini" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "There is an odd kind of deciphering in long sun where Wolfe just says \nthings\noutright (kypris is hyacinth is mamelta is chenille is mother) (because \nthey\nare all literally possessed by kypris or are her physically, and she is \nhis real\nmother) and I take the Gods in the tunnels as another one of those \ninstances\nof just literal statement. There are gods in the tunnels." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "If I recall correctly, Silk is falling asleep when that occurs to me. They \nare all embodiments of Woman - that is how I see it. I don't think it makes \nany sense literally to make them the same person. We know that on Urth \nMamelta was a computer technician of no special importance, for a start, and \nwhile we could invent some relationship between her and the Urthly Kypris, \nit seems like it would be strained.\n\nAs for the gods of the tunnels, I see it as a blasphemous joke that would be \nplausible in real life. 'Dog' is 'god' written backward, after all. The \ndogs ARE the lords of the tunnels. And they eat the human 'sacrifices' that \nare placed there.\n\nI think if you interpret everything as a coded message from the author to \nthe readers, there is no room for the characters to have life. And Wolfe's \ncharacters are important to him. They aren't intended to be just ciphers.\n\n\n- Gerry Quinn " } ] }, { "message_id": "<23229698-0F2B-48B1-ABDE-2D46C82603A7@yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T13:07:34+00:00", "subject": "(urth) Wolfe's advice to writers, written on his hand", "in_reply_to": "<7F9C69D56DD0457FA644097AD3D07DD5@Rover>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Yes\n\nSent from my iPhone" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Aug 27, 2013, at 4:18 AM, \"Gerry Quinn\" wrote:\n\n\nFrom: Craig Brewer\nhttp://betweenletters.quora.com/14-Writers-Handwrite-Their-Writing-Advice-on-Their-Hands?ref=fb\n\n\nSo Wolfe is left-handed?\n\n\n- Gerry Quinn \n_______________________________________________" } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T13:19:19+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Gerry, I agree on the blasphemous inversion of mere dogs being called gods, but I think that too is a symbol of the presumptuous sleeping men who were called gods. That blind fellow in short sun who Horn runs into that reminds him so fiercely of Auk - there simply isn't an explanation for him if he is not in some way tenebrous Tartaros - I maintain the whorl is the ark where Typhon stored his family and his animals until the deluge receded. If that makes the characters ciphers .... I just don't see them as that even if every once in a while a symbol reflects on an implied plot device. I think Wolfe is a symbolist who is not above employing complicated linguistic tricks playing with representation-actuality. " } ] }, { "message_id": "<9BC7C1E2-BE2C-44C5-88F7-A62EF0A865DA@yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T13:26:34+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "One of the oddest moments in New Sun comes when Severian reflects on how the language he uses is perspicuous, with one word having only one meaning, when the wording of every statement in new sun is ambiguous. \"he was the smallest of those dead\" - this is another example of the literal interpretation being the \"right\" one even though it doesn't fit the context. Grammatically it says Triskele (a three legged tripod used in worship of a sun god) is dead. Everything is heliocentric in the metaphors of new sun- the coast rises to meet the sun, etc. We know it can't be literally true because Triskele is alive, but the literal, coded message is that the Claw is not the actual source of healing. Does that make Severian and his dog ciphers? " } ] }, { "message_id": "<04A1A580-3758-4E3B-8069-44A6F3310246@yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T13:42:00+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<9BC7C1E2-BE2C-44C5-88F7-A62EF0A865DA@yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "\"Things weaker than our words for them\" - I have found this quote actually quite invaluable in approaching Wolfe. Words have meanings - Wolfe often implies all of those meanings despite pure narrative logic. He is obsessed with the meanings of names as a look at his essays in Castle of Days would prove where he tells you what the names of other prominent authors mean historically. This interest in a word and its essence and all its meanings no doubt preoccupies a self-conscious writer, but he tends to rarely descend to the completely meta level, though at times he flirts with it in his short work and stuff like the introduction to Endangered Species emphasizing the reader. I think this is slightly disingenuous, but his speeches and his intros are surprisingly completely non-elitist. \n\nSent from my iPhone" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Aug 27, 2013, at 6:26 AM, Marc Aramini wrote:\nOne of the oddest moments in New Sun comes when Severian reflects on how the language he uses is perspicuous, with one word having only one meaning, when the wording of every statement in new sun is ambiguous. \"he was the smallest of those dead\" - this is another example of the literal interpretation being the \"right\" one even though it doesn't fit the context. Grammatically it says Triskele (a three legged tripod used in worship of a sun god) is dead. Everything is heliocentric in the metaphors of new sun- the coast rises to meet the sun, etc. We know it can't be literally true because Triskele is alive, but the literal, coded message is that the Claw is not the actual source of healing. Does that make Severian and his dog ciphers? \n_______________________________________________" } ] }, { "message_id": "<9F2378A0-3CAF-4545-A564-EEFA7A34E7E9@yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T13:48:48+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<9BC7C1E2-BE2C-44C5-88F7-A62EF0A865DA@yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Last post this morning - the intro to Enangered Species and several other essays indicate a vague hostility to an academic environment that promulgates the cult of dead authors. Yet ironically the current trend of colleges to emphasize modern stuff that students can relate to would be, possibly, equally inimical to the traditional texts that Wolfe reveres. I can't help thinking that it is in particular the sophisticated New Wave and the sf of the 60s and 70s that he is really writing about. All these trendy modern texts that are being assigned to students might match up with Wolfe's big point in his intro, and yet ... Current trends feel so intellectually impoverished, bargain basement, and devoid of a traditional awareness of continuity. " } ] }, { "message_id": "<4E9BC6CAF68C47D5A259D3117C963716@Rover>", "from": { "name": "Gerry Quinn", "address": "gerry at bindweed.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T15:05:41+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "From: Marc Aramini" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Gerry, I agree on the blasphemous inversion of mere dogs being\ncalled gods, but I think that too is a symbol of the presumptuous\nsleeping men who were called gods. That blind fellow in short\nsun who Horn runs into that reminds him so fiercely of Auk - there\n simply isn't an explanation for him if he is not in some way\ntenebrous Tartaros - I maintain the whorl is the ark where\nTyphon stored his family and his animals until the deluge receded." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Well, yes - but he had them digitised and they became the gods of the Whorl. \nSure, there may have been some plan to have them physically embodied once \nthey reached Blue. But I don't think that the characters in the story are \nunknowingly the same personalities." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "If that makes the characters ciphers .... I just don't see them as\nthat even if every once in a while a symbol reflects on an implied\nplot device. I think Wolfe is a symbolist who is not above\nemploying complicated linguistic tricks playing with \nrepresentation-actuality." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "When I mentioned ciphers I was thinking more of the \nKypris-Mamelta-Chenille-Mother thing in the context of Silk himself. Is \nSilk not allowed to have whimsical thoughts that do not embody hard literal \nfacts about the system, even when he is almost dreaming? Or does he exist \nonly to convey details from Wolfe's pen to the reader's eye?\n\n- Gerry Quinn" } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Gerry Quinn", "address": "gerry at bindweed.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T15:18:13+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<9BC7C1E2-BE2C-44C5-88F7-A62EF0A865DA@yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "From: Marc Aramini" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "One of the oddest moments in New Sun comes when Severian\nreflects on how the language he uses is perspicuous, with one\nword having only one meaning, when the wording of every\nstatement in new sun is ambiguous. \"he was the smallest of\nthose dead\" - this is another example of the literal interpretation\nbeing the \"right\" one even though it doesn't fit the context.\nGrammatically it says Triskele (a three legged tripod used in\nworship of a sun god) is dead. Everything is heliocentric in\n the metaphors of new sun- the coast rises to meet the sun,\netc. We know it can't be literally true because Triskele is\nalive, but the literal, coded message is that the Claw is not\nthe actual source of healing. Does that make Severian and\n his dog ciphers?" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "I don't really get this. \"He was the smallest of those dead\" could mean he \nwas dead, or it could mean he was the smallest of those left for dead by the \nresidents of the Bear Tower, even if he was not literally dead.\n\nMaybe he wasn't quite dead, or maybe he was dead and was raised by Severian. \nThe Claw was never the source of healing, even though Severian thought it \nwas for a time.\n\nEither way, there's a difference between the story being told by way of the \ncharacters (which is fine), and the characters internal lives existing only \nas vehicles for the telling (which is not).\n\n- Gerry Quinn" } ] }, { "message_id": "<53BAE42A-09E7-4484-BD0B-D5D0815E144F@gmail.com>", "from": { "name": "entonio at gmail.com", "address": "entonio at gmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T15:42:40+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "No dia 27/08/2013, ?s 16:18, \"Gerry Quinn\" escreveu:" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Either way, there's a difference between the story being told by way of the characters (which is fine), and the characters internal lives existing only as vehicles for the telling (which is not)." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "It could be the case that Wolfe is doing more of the latter than one thinks would be nice. Though I don't see him abusing that." } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Lee Berman", "address": "severiansola at hotmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-27T17:58:02+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<53BAE42A-09E7-4484-BD0B-D5D0815E144F@gmail.com>", "reply_link": "subject", "blocks": [ { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Gerry Quinn: Is Silk not allowed to have whimsical thoughts that do not \nembody hard literal facts about the system, even when he is almost dreaming? \nOr does he exist only to convey details from Wolfe's pen to the reader's eye?" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Silk does only exist to convey details from Wolfe's pen to the reader's eye.\nWe can never forget that, nor, I think, does Wolfe want us to.\n\nThis does not preclude Wolfe from wanting to depict Silk as a \"realistic\"\nperson who sometimes has wandering, meandering thoughts which have no\npurpose or meaning in regard to the big picture of the story.\n\nIt is the goal of many authors to create humanistic, \"real\" characters who \nare relatable to the reader. Somtimes this character development takes \nprecedence over the plot and overarching themes. Is Wolfe is one of those \nauthors?\n\nI don't think he is, especially in writing the Sun series. In this 12 book \nseries, Wolfe is loathe to invent names or terminology, preferring instead to \ndraw upon existing archaisms, obscure nature references, etc. By this principle\nI tend to think that Wolfe doesn't aspire to invent Silk a \"real\" person by\nendowing him with pointless but realistic human attributes and thoughts. It is \njust my personal opinion but I think everything about Silk has a story-specific\nmeaning at some level (including autobiographical). \n\nIn addition to what has already been posted about dogs as gods, I tend to \ntake a meta-interpretation of it in addition to the other suggestions.\n\nMany agree that Wolfe inserts dogs and wolves throughout his stories as a\nsort of self-reference. Perhaps these dogs as gods is a reference to his\nown status as the creator of the universe we are inhabiting as we read.\n\nWolfe's familiarity with gnostic principles seems unquestionable, so I don't\nthink it escapes him that as he writes, he is functioning as a Demiurge. \nPerhaps the dogs/gods are a recognition that while he is the creator of this \nuniverse, he acknowledges that he is a false (and perhaps evil) god and that\nthe one true, spiritual God above all should always be recognized foremost. \t\t \t \t\t " } ] }, { "message_id": "<521D1FA8.5060000@verizon.net>", "from": { "name": "David Stockhoff", "address": "dstockhoff at verizon.net" }, "date": "2013-08-27T21:52:40+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Severian, for example, is totally a clockwork figure---but not forever, \nsince he becomes a god. Silk too may be freer in Mainframe than in his body." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On 8/24/2013 1:12 PM, Daniel Otto Jack Petersen wrote:\n'He realizes that he has very little freedom and it is all set up. \nHowever, Mamelta is swallowed by the giant fish, and I think this too \nis a symbol - that Kypris is subsumed by something far greater than \nherself, so that the englightenment, which Silk misinterprets at least \nonce and possibly twice, serves the Outsider in the final analysis \neven if Pas and Kypris, the male and female voice, set it up as the \nspark that would start their little clockwork plan in motion, like the \ndancing toy controlled by Mother.'\n\nI think I agree with this. I don't think that Silk being shown in \nvarious ways to be a 'clockwork figure' is meant to convey that he \ndefinitely is and always will be. I think it indicates that *some* \nforces have that in mind for him as part of their master plan, but \nthat the Outsider actually liberates Silk out of this simplistic \npre-determinism into a responsive sort of agency as part of a 'greater \nplan' than the schemes of gods ontologically 'smaller' than the Outsider.\n\n\nOn Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marc Aramini > wrote:\n\n By now everyone know I actually think Wolfe creates symbols and\n \"metaphors\" that are actually extremely literal. Thus, Shadow\n Children riding Marshmen is the same as Shadow Children riding a\n man named Marsch (his name is misspelled in my copy as Marsh in\n the title \"A Story by John V Marsh\", which I feel might be\n intentional even if changed in later editions by copy editors).\n I've always felt that Silk felt particularly manipulated, and that\n this prompted his suicidal thoughts. Kypris is equated with\n mother, Hyacinth, and Mamelta in his dreams. I want to talk about\n the dancing toy that his mother makes move for him - I think this\n is a symbol of Silk, and that \"mother\" calls the shots. When he\n is enlightened, that female dove voice he hears has always\n resonated, in my mind, with Kypris, and when mamelta is awakened I\n have always posited that her claim, \"We will be lovers\" is not\n from Mucor (who was insistent that no sex with Silk would occur in\n their first meeting) but actually from somewhere else.\n It is Mother who makes the little toy dance, it is Kypris who\n calls Silk to join with her and Typhon in mainframe, it is Kypris\n in Hyacinth that compels Silk to love a prostitute at first, and I\n think it is Kypris' voice in the enlightenment (which can have a\n physical cause and still be serving the Outsider, just as the\n castle in the sky is a tent full of hot air in New Sun - it has a\n physical cause, even though Crane's explanation seems absurd,\n training us NOT to look for it).\n I think that the rather odd naming of the dogs in the tunnels as\n gods is indicative of exactly what it implies literally: the gods\n are in the tunnels - the sleepers behind the seals of Pas. Before\n his probably suicide attempt, Silk indicates that he is aware of\n his origins now and that he learned them in the time down below. \n While we can say this is just a statement about humanity and the\n whorl, I think it is personal - he realizes that the things which\n control him (Mother Kypris) are using him like that dancing toy,\n that his enlightenment might be spurious and predetermined in that\n gnostic universe (how quickly the chalk of Silk for Calde goes up\n after his enlightenment - I've always felt this overdetermined\n beginning is part of that \"clock work figure\" of Silk and the\n whorl. He realizes that he has very little freedom and it is all\n set up. However, Mamelta is swallowed by the giant fish, and I\n think this too is a symbol - that Kypris is subsumed by something\n far greater than herself, so that the englightenment, which Silk\n misinterprets at least once and possibly twice, serves the\n Outsider in the final analysis even if Pas and Kypris, the male\n and female voice, set it up as the spark that would start their\n little clockwork plan in motion, like the dancing toy controlled\n by Mother.\n\n _______________________________________________" } ] }, { "message_id": "<4FF27F81-2B42-4327-A68E-100EE4115525@yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T01:39:10+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<521D1FA8.5060000@verizon.net>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Severian is a tricky case as far as free will and determinism goes - a WAY more ambiguous guy than Silk. The whole might makes right attitude he shows in taming eata and the external descriptions of Severian as a very cruel and hard man in The Map shows to some degree a casuist: none of the bad stuff is my fault, I was a puppet... But I am a good ruler, obey me as I obey those powers we cannot understand. The love of the dog for its master as the highest form of love, besides being touching, really reveals something about sev's adult perspective as well. \n\nSent from my iPhone" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Aug 27, 2013, at 2:52 PM, David Stockhoff wrote:\nSeverian, for example, is totally a clockwork figure---but not forever, since he becomes a god. Silk too may be freer in Mainframe than in his body.\n\nOn 8/24/2013 1:12 PM, Daniel Otto Jack Petersen wrote:" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 2, "text": "'He realizes that he has very little freedom and it is all set up. However, Mamelta is swallowed by the giant fish, and I think this too is a symbol - that Kypris is subsumed by something far greater than herself, so that the englightenment, which Silk misinterprets at least once and possibly twice, serves the Outsider in the final analysis even if Pas and Kypris, the male and female voice, set it up as the spark that would start their little clockwork plan in motion, like the dancing toy controlled by Mother.'\n\nI think I agree with this. I don't think that Silk being shown in various ways to be a 'clockwork figure' is meant to convey that he definitely is and always will be. I think it indicates that *some* forces have that in mind for him as part of their master plan, but that the Outsider actually liberates Silk out of this simplistic pre-determinism into a responsive sort of agency as part of a 'greater plan' than the schemes of gods ontologically 'smaller' than the Outsider.\n\n\nOn Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Marc Aramini > wrote:\n\n By now everyone know I actually think Wolfe creates symbols and\n \"metaphors\" that are actually extremely literal. Thus, Shadow\n Children riding Marshmen is the same as Shadow Children riding a\n man named Marsch (his name is misspelled in my copy as Marsh in\n the title \"A Story by John V Marsh\", which I feel might be\n intentional even if changed in later editions by copy editors).\n I've always felt that Silk felt particularly manipulated, and that\n this prompted his suicidal thoughts. Kypris is equated with\n mother, Hyacinth, and Mamelta in his dreams. I want to talk about\n the dancing toy that his mother makes move for him - I think this\n is a symbol of Silk, and that \"mother\" calls the shots. When he\n is enlightened, that female dove voice he hears has always\n resonated, in my mind, with Kypris, and when mamelta is awakened I\n have always posited that her claim, \"We will be lovers\" is not\n from Mucor (who was insistent that no sex with Silk would occur in\n their first meeting) but actually from somewhere else.\n It is Mother who makes the little toy dance, it is Kypris who\n calls Silk to join with her and Typhon in mainframe, it is Kypris\n in Hyacinth that compels Silk to love a prostitute at first, and I\n think it is Kypris' voice in the enlightenment (which can have a\n physical cause and still be serving the Outsider, just as the\n castle in the sky is a tent full of hot air in New Sun - it has a\n physical cause, even though Crane's explanation seems absurd,\n training us NOT to look for it).\n I think that the rather odd naming of the dogs in the tunnels as\n gods is indicative of exactly what it implies literally: the gods\n are in the tunnels - the sleepers behind the seals of Pas. Before\n his probably suicide attempt, Silk indicates that he is aware of\n his origins now and that he learned them in the time down below. While we can say this is just a statement about humanity and the\n whorl, I think it is personal - he realizes that the things which\n control him (Mother Kypris) are using him like that dancing toy,\n that his enlightenment might be spurious and predetermined in that\n gnostic universe (how quickly the chalk of Silk for Calde goes up\n after his enlightenment - I've always felt this overdetermined\n beginning is part of that \"clock work figure\" of Silk and the\n whorl. He realizes that he has very little freedom and it is all\n set up. However, Mamelta is swallowed by the giant fish, and I\n think this too is a symbol - that Kypris is subsumed by something\n far greater than herself, so that the englightenment, which Silk\n misinterprets at least once and possibly twice, serves the\n Outsider in the final analysis even if Pas and Kypris, the male\n and female voice, set it up as the spark that would start their\n little clockwork plan in motion, like the dancing toy controlled\n by Mother.\n\n _______________________________________________" } ] }, { "message_id": "<73C62E19-9586-438E-BE1E-DC85EE09EC54@yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T01:43:00+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<4FF27F81-2B42-4327-A68E-100EE4115525@yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Silk is the shepherd who puts others first, Severian the culler and the butcher whose salvation leaves only himself standing alone. I am still thinking that Typhon did more good for humanity in the long run than Severian... Maybe. So hard to say if the green man's future is even any good. " } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Lee Berman", "address": "severiansola at hotmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T11:52:11+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<73C62E19-9586-438E-BE1E-DC85EE09EC54@yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "subject", "blocks": [ { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Marc Aramini: Silk is the shepherd who puts others first, Severian the \nculler and the butcher whose salvation leaves only himself standing alone. \nI am still thinking that Typhon did more good for humanity in the long run \nthan Severian... Maybe. So hard to say if the green man's future is even any \ngood." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Surely the answer to this question is an individual one. It is an old question,\nbut one which has been recently framed in terms of socialism vs. libertarianism.\n\nWhich is the \"better\" way to live? With the technological and social advantages\nand the compromises and restrictions of high density population ?\n\nOr with the freedoms, loneliness and boredom which accompanies a more solitary\nisolated lifestyle?\n\nSurely this is an individual choice. I suppose we could look at global trends\ntoward urban, suburban and rural living and draw some conclusions about \nhumanity. But I think it is safe to conclude that the competing drives for \nsocializing and freedom-seeking will continue to shape the course of human\nhistory for its duration. \t\t \t \t\t " } ] }, { "message_id": "<9673B2D1A979403780369C138259CF3B@Rover>", "from": { "name": "Gerry Quinn", "address": "gerry at bindweed.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T12:43:18+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "From: Lee Berman" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 2, "text": "Gerry Quinn: Is Silk not allowed to have whimsical thoughts that do not\nembody hard literal facts about the system, even when he is almost \ndreaming?\nOr does he exist only to convey details from Wolfe's pen to the reader's \neye?" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Silk does only exist to convey details from Wolfe's pen to the reader's \neye.\nWe can never forget that, nor, I think, does Wolfe want us to." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "True in a technical sense. The question, however, is whether some of those \ndetails relate to Silk as a character." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "This does not preclude Wolfe from wanting to depict Silk as a \"realistic\"\nperson who sometimes has wandering, meandering thoughts which have no\npurpose or meaning in regard to the big picture of the story.\n\nIt is the goal of many authors to create humanistic, \"real\" characters who\nare relatable to the reader. Somtimes this character development takes\nprecedence over the plot and overarching themes. Is Wolfe is one of those\nauthors?" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "That's not really relevant, as all I have proposed is that Silk is endowed \nwith a small amount of humanistic autonomy - the ability to occasionally \ndream random thoughts as he falls to sleep. That doesn't constitute 'taking \nprecedence over the plot and overarching themes'.\n\nWe know that in Long Sun Wolfe does not in fact take a totalitarian approach \nin which characters exist solely as ciphers to inform the reader and advance \nthe plot. He works hard - too hard, arguably - on speech patterns to give \nthem individual voices. The book is long and full of tangents, diversions \nand digressions.\n\nThat the central character Silk should have an inner life is to be expected, \ntherefore, and we should not interpret everything he dreams as blunt \ninfodumps, particularly when they are not in accordance with information we \ngain from elsewhere. Mamelta tells her story, and if Wolfe intended it to \nintersect with Silk's in such a way that she could in some sense be his \nmother, he could have made it do so (and without spelling it out).\n\n- Gerry Quinn" } ] }, { "message_id": "<1377705571.39663.YahooMailNeo@web160703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T15:59:31+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": " \n\n________________________________\n\nFrom: Lee Berman \nTo: \"urth at urth.net\" \nSent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:58 AM\nIn addition to what has already been posted about dogs as gods, I tend to \ntake a meta-interpretation of it in addition to the other suggestions.\n\nMany agree that Wolfe inserts dogs and wolves throughout his stories as a\nsort of self-reference. Perhaps these dogs as gods is a reference to his\nown status as the creator of the universe we are inhabiting as we read.\n\nWolfe's familiarity with gnostic principles seems unquestionable, so I don't\nthink it escapes him that as he writes, he is functioning as a Demiurge. \nPerhaps the dogs/gods are a recognition that while he is the creator of this \nuniverse, he acknowledges that he is a false (and perhaps evil) god and that\nthe one true, spiritual God above all should always be recognized foremost. ??? ??? ??? ? ??? ??? ? " } ] }, { "message_id": "<1377705746.61706.YahooMailNeo@web160703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T16:02:26+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377705571.39663.YahooMailNeo@web160703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "all of which begs the question, I suppose, of what we are to make of the authorial voice in the afterwords to the New Sun books ... part of the fictional allusive text or just a rationalization/way to put in a bit more information? Interesting that they are completely absent in Long/Short Sun.\n \n\n \n\n\n\n \n\n________________________________\n\nFrom: Lee Berman \nTo: \"urth at urth.net\" \nSent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:58 AM\nIn addition to what has already been posted about dogs as gods, I\n tend to \ntake a meta-interpretation of it in addition to the other suggestions.\n\nMany agree that Wolfe inserts dogs and wolves throughout his stories as a\nsort of self-reference. Perhaps these dogs as gods is a reference to his\nown status as the creator of the universe we are inhabiting as we read.\n\nWolfe's familiarity with gnostic principles seems unquestionable, so I don't\nthink it escapes him that as he writes, he is functioning as a Demiurge. \nPerhaps the dogs/gods are a recognition that while he is the creator of this \nuniverse, he acknowledges that he is a false (and perhaps evil) god and that\nthe one true, spiritual God above all should always be recognized foremost. ??? ??? ??? ? ??? ??? ? " } ] }, { "message_id": "<1377705967.45766.YahooMailNeo@web160706.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T16:06:07+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377705746.61706.YahooMailNeo@web160703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "I almost feel as if Wolfe was very interested in metafiction in the early to late 80s and then gradually lost interest in it, reverting back to more traditional narrative in the 90s (without completely abandoning the old indeterminate perceptual questions like \"was I a butterfly dreaming I was a man, or a man dreaming I was a butterfly?\" which seem to form such a strong thematic element of collections like Strange Travellers (Bluesberry Jam and Ain't You Most Done?, for example)" } ] }, { "message_id": "<1377706231.71620.YahooMailNeo@web160703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T16:10:31+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": " \n\n________________________________" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": " From: Lee Berman \nTo: \"urth at urth.net\" \nSent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:58 AM\nSubject: (urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "In addition to what has already been posted about dogs as gods, I tend to \ntake a meta-interpretation of it in addition to the other suggestions.\n\nMany agree that Wolfe inserts dogs and wolves throughout his stories as a\nsort of self-reference. Perhaps these dogs as gods is a reference to his\nown status as the creator of the universe we are inhabiting as we read.\n\nWolfe's familiarity with gnostic principles seems unquestionable, so I don't\nthink it escapes him that as he writes, he is functioning as a Demiurge. \nPerhaps the dogs/gods are a recognition that while he is the creator of this \nuniverse, he acknowledges that he is a false (and perhaps evil) god and that\nthe one true, spiritual God above all should always be recognized foremost. ??? ??? ??? ? ??? ??? ? " } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes", "address": "danldo at gmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T16:24:09+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377706231.71620.YahooMailNeo@web160703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "One other thing about the dogs/gods -- given that they eat the sacrifices,\nare they a slam at priestly castes who grow fat on their flocks?" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Marc Aramini wrote:\n\n *From:* Lee Berman \n*To:* \"urth at urth.net\" \n*Sent:* Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:58 AM\n*Subject:* (urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels\n >\n\nIn addition to what has already been posted about dogs as gods, I tend to\ntake a meta-interpretation of it in addition to the other suggestions.\n\nMany agree that Wolfe inserts dogs and wolves throughout his stories as a\nsort of self-reference. Perhaps these dogs as gods is a reference to his\nown status as the creator of the universe we are inhabiting as we read.\n\nWolfe's familiarity with gnostic principles seems unquestionable, so I\ndon't\nthink it escapes him that as he writes, he is functioning as a Demiurge.\nPerhaps the dogs/gods are a recognition that while he is the creator of\nthis\nuniverse, he acknowledges that he is a false (and perhaps evil) god and\nthat\nthe one true, spiritual God above all should always be recognized\nforemost.\n_______________________________________________" } ] }, { "message_id": "<1377708730.39245.YahooMailNeo@web120305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "DAVID STOCKHOFF", "address": "dstockhoff at verizon.net" }, "date": "2013-08-28T16:52:10+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377706231.71620.YahooMailNeo@web160703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "________________________________\nFrom: Marc Aramini \nTo: The Urth Mailing List \nSent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 12:10 PM\nSubject: Re: (urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels\n\n\n\n\n\nFrom: Lee Berman \nTo: \"urth at urth.net\" \nSent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:58 AM\nSubject: (urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "In addition to what has already been posted about dogs as gods, I tend to \ntake a meta-interpretation of it in addition to the other suggestions.\n\nMany agree that Wolfe inserts dogs and wolves throughout his stories as a\nsort of self-reference. Perhaps these dogs as gods is a reference to his\nown status as the creator of the universe we are inhabiting as we read.\n\nWolfe's familiarity with gnostic principles seems unquestionable, so I don't\nthink it escapes him that as he writes, he is functioning as a Demiurge. \nPerhaps the dogs/gods are a recognition that while he is the creator of this \nuniverse, he acknowledges that he is a false (and perhaps evil) god and that\nthe one true, spiritual God above all should always be recognized foremost. ??? ??? ??? ? ??? ??? ? \n_______________________________________________" } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Lee Berman", "address": "severiansola at hotmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T17:33:59+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377708730.39245.YahooMailNeo@web120305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "subject", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Silk does only exist to convey details from Wolfe's pen to the reader's \neye." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Gerry Quinn: True in a technical sense. The question, however, is whether \nsome of those details relate to Silk as a character." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "I will slightly disagree. More specifically I think the question is whether \nsome of those details relate ONLY to Silk as a character and not at all to\nplot or themes. Such details can perform double and triple duties, and with\nWolfe I think they often do." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "....all I have proposed is that Silk is endowed with a small amount of \nhumanistic autonomy - the ability to occasionally dream random thoughts as he \nfalls to sleep." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "I think it is a good proposal and one well worth considering. We can never know\nwhat Wolfe's conscious intentions, not to mention any subconscious intentions, \nwere during his writing. Surely some of Wolfe's writing is meant to perform only\ntne single duty of character development. But which?\n\nPerhaps there is consensus on some lupine issues, but where there is disagreement\nand debate I am willing to guess that Wolfe's own answer, as a caring author,\nmight be, \n\n\"Whichever way makes it a better read for you\". \t\t \t \t\t " } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Lee Berman", "address": "severiansola at hotmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T18:03:59+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "subject", "blocks": [ { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes: One other thing about the dogs/gods -- given that \nthey eat the sacrifices,are they a slam at priestly castes who grow fat \non their flocks?" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "I'm comfortable with that level of interpretation. What I think of as the \n\"social commentary\" level." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Marc Aramini: Lee, I take it back. I do feel that what he is doing in Long \nand Short Sun is actually directly related to his biography. Rosemary and \nWolfe marry, and Plant Engineering provides for their future. " }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Heh, funny Marc. My first response was going to be that I think the \n\"dogs as gods\" was indeed more of a punny aside than the addressing of a main \ntheme.\n\nBut thanks for reminding me of how much I consider Long and especially Short\nSun to be among Wolfe's most autobiographical works. There are the plant and\nanimal names, Horn and Nettle marriage connection. And after Plant Management,\nmight the Horn family's paper making (and of course writing) represent Wolfe's \nlater career as an author?\n\nAlong the same lines, I find what happens between Horn and Seawrack to be\nbrutally, painfully honest. And even from first reading I got the sense that\nwhat happens with Horn's kids, Sinew, Hoof and Hide, and his adoptive kids,\nKrait, Jahlee and perhaps Fava is meant to be reflective of his own family\nreality in some way. The emotions involved seem so raw and real.\n\nI was just last night reading the section of RttW, where Horn kills Jahlee\nwhen he finds her feeding on Nettle. We can't know what might have inspired\nthat tragic family scene but it can't have been good." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "David Stockhoff: \nIf there is any one thing about the Solar Cycle that truly and persistently \namazes me, it is that Wolfe does indeed deploy literal meanings (and any or all \npossible puns orthogonal to those meanings) just as you say, Marc---perhaps \nespecially when they are so obvious as to be invisible. And yet he also relies \non myth for deep narrative structure AND psychological and descriptive realism. \nHis characters are indeed puppets, often openly and significantly so, and yet \nfeel almost real. (Maybe because we all feel like puppets sometimes.)\n\nSuch complexity simply should not be possible. And yet bumblebees do fly!" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Very well worded, David. Exactly how I have often felt. I can't count the number \nof times I've been reading Wolfe and had to stop, with the realization of the level \nof complexity hitting me and thinking, \"he can't DO that\". \t\t \t \t\t " } ] }, { "message_id": "<1377713423.13876.YahooMailNeo@web160705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T18:10:23+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "________________________________\nFrom: Lee Berman \nTo: \"urth at urth.net\" \nSent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:33 AM\nSubject: (urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels\n\nSilk does only exist to convey details from Wolfe's pen to the reader's \neye." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Gerry Quinn: True in a technical sense. The question, however, is whether \nsome of those details relate to Silk as a character." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "I will slightly disagree. More specifically I think the question is whether \nsome of those details relate ONLY to Silk as a character and not at all to\nplot or themes. Such details can perform double and triple duties, and with\nWolfe I think they often do." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "....all I have proposed is that Silk is endowed? with a small amount of \nhumanistic autonomy - the ability to occasionally dream random thoughts as he \nfalls to sleep." }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "I think it is a good proposal and one well worth considering. We can never know\nwhat Wolfe's conscious intentions, not to mention any subconscious intentions, \nwere during his writing. Surely some of Wolfe's writing is meant to perform only\ntne single duty of character development. But which?\n\nPerhaps there is consensus on some lupine issues, but where there is disagreement\nand debate I am willing to guess that Wolfe's own answer, as a caring author,\nmight be, \n\n\"Whichever way makes it a better read for you\". ??? ??? ??? ? ??? ??? ? " } ] }, { "message_id": "<1377714884.98746.YahooMailNeo@web160703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "from": { "name": "Marc Aramini", "address": "marcaramini at yahoo.com" }, "date": "2013-08-28T18:34:44+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Actually one of the darker scenes that recurs several times in Wolfe is a guy perceived as harmless kicking someone to deat (Blue Mouse, Silk and Jahlee, pretty sure Auk did it) and I do wonder if there is an old personal experience or memory about that. \nPS - (Silk kills Jahlee there, that's why it is so emotionally bizarre. Nettle knows that the man who has come back is not her husband anymore)\n\n\n________________________________\nFrom: Lee Berman \nTo: \"urth at urth.net\" \nSent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 11:03 AM\nSubject: (urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels\n\n\n\n\nI was just last night reading the section of RttW, where Horn kills Jahlee\nwhen he finds her feeding on Nettle. We can't know what might have inspired\nthat tragic family scene but it can't have been good." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "David Stockhoff: \nIf there is any one thing about the Solar Cycle that truly and persistently \namazes me, it is that Wolfe does indeed deploy literal meanings (and any or all \npossible puns orthogonal to those meanings) just as you say, Marc---perhaps \nespecially when they are so obvious as to be invisible. And yet he also relies \non myth for deep narrative structure AND psychological and descriptive realism. \nHis characters are indeed puppets, often openly and significantly so, and yet \nfeel almost real. (Maybe because we all feel like puppets sometimes.)\n\nSuch complexity simply should not be possible. And yet bumblebees do fly!" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Very well worded, David. Exactly how I have often felt. I can't count the number \nof times I've been reading Wolfe and had to stop, with the realization of the level \nof complexity hitting me and thinking, \"he can't DO that\". ??? ??? ??? ? ??? ??? ? " } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "David Duffy", "address": "david.duffy at qimr.edu.au" }, "date": "2013-08-28T21:29:58+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Dan'l Danehy-Oakes wrote:\nOne other thing about the dogs/gods -- given that they eat the sacrifices,\nare they a slam at priestly castes who grow fat on their flocks?" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Again riffing on _Wizard Knight_ they are the lowest gods in so many \nways." } ] }, { "message_id": "<1CCAD0CC-846C-4BB8-BD92-680349AE883A@gmail.com>", "from": { "name": "António Pedro Marques", "address": "entonio at gmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-29T03:48:13+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377713423.13876.YahooMailNeo@web160705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "No dia 28/08/2013, ?s 19:10, Marc Aramini escreveu:" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Lee wrote:" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 2, "text": "\"Whichever way makes it a better read for you\". " }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": " \nmaybe in an introduction and in a theory, but I have in the past received responses like \"NO NO NO\" from him ... just throwing that out there" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "But then again that may only mean he's got a whole different perspective from yours, that he wants you to know. It doesn't mean yours is wrong, it lives on its own merit. There are readings I feel cannot have been part of the author's intentions, but if they hadn't been put forward by someone, how would the rest of us come across by their charms?" } ] }, { "message_id": "<4F40A72D-9F5E-44B6-9AE0-822727A9441C@gmail.com>", "from": { "name": "António Pedro Marques", "address": "entonio at gmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-29T03:52:43+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377708730.39245.YahooMailNeo@web120305.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "No dia 28/08/2013, ?s 17:52, DAVID STOCKHOFF escreveu:" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "It's puns all the way down.\n\nIf there is any one thing about the Solar Cycle that truly and persistently amazes me, it is that Wolfe does indeed deploy literal meanings (and any or all possible puns orthogonal to those meanings) just as you say, Marc---perhaps especially when they are so obvious as to be invisible. And yet he also relies on myth for deep narrative structure AND psychological and descriptive realism. His characters are indeed puppets, often openly and significantly so, and yet feel almost real. (Maybe because we all feel like puppets sometimes.)\n\nSuch complexity simply should not be possible. And yet bumblebees do fly!" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "I've felt this a lot from the first Wolfe I read. It's what I'd call physical layering, in parallel with the 'intellectual' layering we spend our time discussing here. It is one of the things that got me so much interested in him. And a lot of the nuance is lost on me as a foreigner!" } ] }, { "message_id": "<6519DA95-CDAC-4FAB-A7E6-B84F048F8F95@gmail.com>", "from": { "name": "António Pedro Marques", "address": "entonio at gmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-29T03:59:08+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels", "in_reply_to": "<1377714884.98746.YahooMailNeo@web160703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>", "reply_link": "header", "blocks": [ { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "No dia 28/08/2013, ?s 19:34, Marc Aramini escreveu:" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Actually one of the darker scenes that recurs several times in Wolfe is a guy perceived as harmless kicking someone to deat (Blue Mouse, Silk and Jahlee, pretty sure Auk did it)" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Auk, harmless? The man does harm by trade. " }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "and I do wonder if there is an old personal experience or memory about that. " }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Yes, this is unsettling. As are some other things - do you remember the talk some time ago about Wolfe's treatment of female characters?" }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "PS - (Silk kills Jahlee there, that's why it is so emotionally bizarre. Nettle knows that the man who has come back is not her husband anymore)" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "That I do not know. They know he isn't Horn because his body is Silk's and his personality likewise - in fact the only reason he can get anyone to entertain him as Horn is because he has all of Horn's memories. But I can very well see Horn being ruthless when needs must. " } ] }, { "message_id": "", "from": { "name": "Lee Berman", "address": "severiansola at hotmail.com" }, "date": "2013-08-30T11:31:27+00:00", "subject": "(urth) silk, the dancing toy, gods in the tunnels‏", "in_reply_to": "<6519DA95-CDAC-4FAB-A7E6-B84F048F8F95@gmail.com>", "reply_link": "subject", "blocks": [ { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Marc Aramini: ..but I have in the past received responses like \"NO NO NO\" from him " }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "Good point. Evidence that there is a part of him which strongly hopes his readers\nwill \"get it right\"." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "Antonio Pedro Marques: But then again that may only mean he's got a whole different \nperspective from yours, that he wants you to know. It doesn't mean yours is wrong, \nit lives on its own merit. There are readings I feel cannot have been part of the \nauthor's intentions, but if they hadn't been put forward by someone, how would the \nrest of us come across by their charms?" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "It would be interesting to learn how Often Wolfe has gain new insight on his own \nwriting from a reader." }, { "kind": "quote", "depth": 1, "text": "...And a lot of the nuance is lost on me as a foreigner!" }, { "kind": "text", "depth": 0, "text": "I'm guessing it doesn't happen so often but frustration could magnify the occasional\noccurrence into seeming greater.\n\nI remember one debate over the connection (or lack of one) between \"vine\" and \"liana\"\namong native english speakers. Once I think Wolfe's long residence in the \"Midwest\"\nregion of the USA came into play. Our personal life's experience surely affect us\nall as Wolfe readers. Being raised Catholic probably helps some readers understand\nWolfe better than I ever could, on certain issues. \t\t \t \t\t " } ] } ] }