# Delage collage *The Urth list — 2 messages, 1 voices, 21 May 1998* > Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright > in each message remains with the person who wrote it. > Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original > archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than > retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. --- ### adam louis stephanides *21 May 1998, 11:16* I think it's a great idea (though I'd like to know how much of the original posts will be cut). It was indeed fascinating to see how many divergent interpretations there were of such a seemingly simple story. It could even make a very informative case study of the process of interpretation. (Maybe somebody will write "S/D," microanalyzing the original story and the discussion in the same way that Barthes analyzed a Balzac story in his book S/Z.) --Adam --- ### adam louis stephanides *23 May 1998, 16:39 · follows adam louis stephanides* > On Sat, 23 May 1998 Damien Broderick wrote: > i've only been here a brief time, but i assume from the responses to my > suzanne collage suggestion that some list members are concerned about being > misquoted off the list. I wasn't worried about being misquoted. What did concern me slightly was the possibility that my conclusions might be given without the reasoning behind them, making them appear more speculative than they are.. (After all, I don't know how much space the editors at NYRSF will give you.) But to repeat, I think it's a great idea, and I hope whatever "worries" I or others may have expressed won't stop you from going ahead with it. --Adam ---