{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/6699",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 6699,
    "subject": "Supervisionists",
    "messages": 2,
    "voices": 2,
    "first": "2014-11-12T13:02:39+00:00",
    "last": "2014-11-12T15:35:48+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<0DA454A32913114C9CC19BB781FB907D0160DF@ETSUMB2.etsu.edu>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Norwood, Frederick Hudson",
        "address": "norwoodr at mail.etsu.edu"
      },
      "date": "2014-11-12T13:02:39+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Supervisionists",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "“If I had any supervision, Fred, would I be riding around in a chicken coop with a lion?”\n\nRick Norwood\n\nFrom: Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Dan'l Danehy-Oakes\nSent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 2:18 PM\nTo: The Urth Mailing List\nSubject: Re: (urth) general video discussing Wolfe and literature\n\nSuperversionists?\n\nOn Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com<mailto:marcaramini at gmail.com>> wrote:\nThat's how it's done- beat 'em at their own game.  Are practitioners superverts or superverters?\n\n\nOn Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Matthew King <automatthew at gmail.com<mailto:automatthew at gmail.com>> wrote:"
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "On Nov 11, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Otto Jack Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com<mailto:danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com>> wrote:\nhe kind of uses the trappings of postmodernism to undermine its commitment to utter fragmentation and subjectivity"
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "\"Superversion\" as John C. Wright calls it."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<1415806548.45527.YahooMailNeo@web120303.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>",
      "from": {
        "name": "DAVID STOCKHOFF",
        "address": "dstockhoff at verizon.net"
      },
      "date": "2014-11-12T15:35:48+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Supervisionists",
      "in_reply_to": "<0DA454A32913114C9CC19BB781FB907D0160DF@ETSUMB2.etsu.edu>",
      "reply_link": "header",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Now, that is an obscure reference."
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:02 AM, \"Norwood, Frederick Hudson\" <NORWOODR at mail.etsu.edu> wrote:\n\n\n\n?If I had any supervision, Fred, would I be riding around in a chicken coop with a lion?\n\nRick Norwood\n\nFrom:Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Dan'l Danehy-Oakes\nSent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 2:18 PM\nTo: The Urth Mailing List\nSubject: Re: (urth) general video discussing Wolfe and literature\n\nSuperversionists?\n\nOn Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at gmail.com> wrote:\nThat's how it's done- beat 'em at their own game.  Are practitioners superverts or superverters?\n\n\nOn Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Matthew King <automatthew at gmail.com> wrote:\nOn Nov 11, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Otto Jack Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote:"
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 2,
          "text": "he kind of uses the trappings of postmodernism to undermine its commitment to utter fragmentation and subjectivity"
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "\"Superversion\" as John C. Wright calls it.\n_______________________________________________"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}