Supervisionists The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 12 Nov 2014 https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/6699 Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact. ============================================================================== Norwood, Frederick Hudson — 12 Nov 2014, 13:02 “If I had any supervision, Fred, would I be riding around in a chicken coop with a lion?” Rick Norwood From: Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Dan'l Danehy-Oakes Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 2:18 PM To: The Urth Mailing List Subject: Re: (urth) general video discussing Wolfe and literature Superversionists? On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Marc Aramini > wrote: That's how it's done- beat 'em at their own game. Are practitioners superverts or superverters? On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Matthew King > wrote: > On Nov 11, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Otto Jack Petersen > wrote: > he kind of uses the trappings of postmodernism to undermine its commitment to utter fragmentation and subjectivity "Superversion" as John C. Wright calls it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DAVID STOCKHOFF — 12 Nov 2014, 15:35 in reply to Norwood, Frederick Hudson Now, that is an obscure reference. > On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:02 AM, "Norwood, Frederick Hudson" wrote: > > > > ?If I had any supervision, Fred, would I be riding around in a chicken coop with a lion? > > Rick Norwood > > From:Urth [mailto:urth-bounces at lists.urth.net] On Behalf Of Dan'l Danehy-Oakes > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 2:18 PM > To: The Urth Mailing List > Subject: Re: (urth) general video discussing Wolfe and literature > > Superversionists? > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Marc Aramini wrote: > That's how it's done- beat 'em at their own game. Are practitioners superverts or superverters? > > > On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Matthew King wrote: > On Nov 11, 2014, at 12:20 PM, Daniel Otto Jack Petersen wrote: > > he kind of uses the trappings of postmodernism to undermine its commitment to utter fragmentation and subjectivity > "Superversion" as John C. Wright calls it. > _______________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------