{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/71",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "urth",
  "thread": {
    "id": 71,
    "subject": "Nunnery!",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "1997-06-25T23:11:00+00:00",
    "last": "1997-06-25T23:11:00+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<urth-v0002-0116@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "m.driussi",
        "address": "m.driussi at genie.com"
      },
      "date": "1997-06-25T23:11:00+00:00",
      "subject": "(urth) Re: Nunnery!",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Reply:  Item #0419205 from URTH at LISTS.BEST.COM@INTERNET#\n\nRory,\n\nWelcome!\n\nInteresting, re: nunnery.  (Quick!  Let's look in the bound OED\nbefore alga has a chance to dazzle us with her CD-ROM version . . .\nhere we go, first citation for use as \"house of ill fame,\" 1593.)\nWell it certainly makes sense, what with Hamlet acting wiggy and all\n(anachronistic as it might be for the Dane of an earlier day speaking\nin the hip-hop of the moment).\n\nIt also plays \"ring around the rosey\" with Nutria's naughty-nun\nwitches (nun-so-naughty).  Bravo!\n\n=mantis="
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}