Theodicy
The Urth list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 01 Jul 1997
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/77

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Alice Turner — 01 Jul 1997, 09:23

> 	Gimmeabreak! Was Shakespeare writing tracts instead of plays, because he
> had messages for the monarchs? 

This does not parse.

> > > Slimey Alga wrote:

> > > > Ratty,
> > > > 
> > > > I define a Christian as someone who believes that he or she will
> > > > attain
> > > > eternal salvation through Jesus Christ. Severian has never heard of
> > > > Jesus
> > > > Christ, and he himself has brought salvation (through destruction) to
> > > > Urth.

> > > 	Whoa! Agia refers to the Theoanthropos in 1:21. Also, in that chapter
> > > the
> > > woman missionary (Marie - Mary) is reading from the Urth equivalent of
> > > Deuteronomy 34. (1:21 = Shadow, ch. 21).

[skip]

> 	Well, there are two questions here: 1. Is there a "Jesus Christ" in the
> Urth/Whorl universe; and 2. Is Severian a self-conscious follower of that
> person? The answer to "1" is what I was dealing with. Some wrote that
> Jesus
> is unknown in the Urth/Whorl universe. I pointed out that he clearly is,
> because of "Theoanthropos." The more obvious line of evidence is the Silk
> quartet, where references to the crucifixion, to the sign of the cross,
> etc. are more in evidence.
> 	As for question 2., I don't know. Wolfe says that Severian is not what
> he
> regards as a Christ figure (allegory of Christ, I take it), but a
> Christian
> figure (allegory of a Christian, I take it). I don't understand why
> anyone
> wants to insist that Wolfe intends something he has stated clearly that
> he
> does not intend.

Almost certainly, Agia's Theoanthropos does refer to JC, though probably
not consciously. (If it were conscious, and she a believer, that would be
interesting, considering her character.) But he's not the only hero with
such claims. Gilgamesh was 2/3 god and only 1/3 human; Herakles was 1/2
god. And so on. Urth is very old, and ancient stories tend to conflate, as
the Brown Book shows us again and again. The Theoanthropos could be taken
as a composite figure, as indeed Silk's Outsider seems to be. In any case,
he doesn't seem to register with Severian.

As for Severian's being a Christian, well, let's agree to differ. Your idea
(and perhaps Wolfe's) of what constitutes a Christian, even allegorically
(whatever that may mean in this context), is not mine, nor, it seems, that
of many of the rest of this group.  

[skip: kittens as baseballs]

> 	Well, that's (a) an irrelevant ad hominem argument, and (b) at least as
> false as true.

(a) Granted. (I did put it in parens.) (b.) How so?

> 	BTW, are you the authoress of a book on hell that I happen to have on my
> shelf?

I haven't looked at your shelf recently, but probably. Quaint term.

-alga-

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim Jordan — 01 Jul 1997, 17:43
  follows, by subject match Alice Turner

At 09:23 AM 7/1/97 -0400, you wrote:


NUTRIA: 	Gimmeabreak! Was Shakespeare writing tracts instead of plays,
because he

> > had messages for the monarchs? 

ALGA:>This does not parse.

	I took you as writing that if Wolfe had an anti-idolatry polemic in his
works, they would not be literature. 


ALGA: >Almost certainly, Agia's Theoanthropos does refer to JC, though
probably

> not consciously. (If it were conscious, and she a believer, that would be
> interesting, considering her character.) But he's not the only hero with
> such claims. Gilgamesh was 2/3 god and only 1/3 human; Herakles was 1/2
> god. And so on. Urth is very old, and ancient stories tend to conflate, as
> the Brown Book shows us again and again. The Theoanthropos could be taken
> as a composite figure, as indeed Silk's Outsider seems to be. In any case,
> he doesn't seem to register with Severian.

	Well, I agree about Agia as a person. And I cannot gainsay your other
points as well. But I don't think Wolfe believes that Christianity will
disappear in the far future, so the assumption that Christianity is simply
unknown at that time does not "parse." Silk's religion certainly has a good
deal of it in the background, and his enlightenments clearly show Christ.

> As for Severian's being a Christian, well, let's agree to differ. Your idea
> (and perhaps Wolfe's) of what constitutes a Christian, even allegorically
> (whatever that may mean in this context), is not mine, nor, it seems, that
> of many of the rest of this group.  

	Sure. We can lay it to rest, FOR NOW!!!!!!

The Rat

------------------------------------------------------------------------------