{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/1306",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "whorl",
  "thread": {
    "id": 1306,
    "subject": "The Mystery of Malrubius's Ghost, SOLVED!",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2001-03-29T23:00:58+00:00",
    "last": "2001-03-29T23:00:58+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<whorl-v0012-0515@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "William Ansley",
        "address": "wansley at warwick.net"
      },
      "date": "2001-03-29T23:00:58+00:00",
      "subject": "(whorl) The Mystery of Malrubius's Ghost, SOLVED!",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "I thought I would take the liberty of assembling the appropriate \nportions of the relevant posts."
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "At 7:53 PM +0000 2/6/01, Ian Smith wrote:\nand another from cephelothorax:\n\n\"Persnickety: Are we really meant to believe that\n Severian, who writes about Master Ash, and the Green\nMan, and being a white fountain hundreds of years\nbefore he's born is going to consider \"Horn\" too much\nof a stretch for his readers to believe because he's\ngot the love-vibe and walks through walls?\"\n\nOn this I'm no more certain, but I got the distinct impression that the\napprentice Severian was under the impression that Horn / Silk's spirit  was\nactually Malrubius' ghost (hence his comment to Gurloes about Oreb), which\nof course does get mentioned frequently throughout TBOTNS( & he certainly\npairs Malrubius with Triskele a fair bit).  Whether Wolfe has managed the\nphenomenal task of tying the ends up, we won't know until someone has the\nenergy to re-read TBOTNS looking for them.  Surely such a thing is\nimpossible, but I'm trying not to make the mistake of under-estimating\nWolfe..."
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "At 1:35 PM +0000 2/9/01, Spectacled Bear wrote:\nAt 07:30 2001-02-09 EST, BMeyer7 at aol.com wrote:"
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "..."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "..."
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "3. Are we to believe that Horn/Silk is Malrubius?\n\n<<<<\nIt's an interesting idea, and quite plausible."
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "At 6:39 PM -0500 3/29/01, BraveSaintCroix at aol.com wrote:\n    Whoo-pee, I finally feel like I have something worthwhile to contribute\nto this group- unless, of course, someone beats me to it.  I got the April\ncatalogue of the Science Fiction Book Club today, and it has a one-page\narticle/advertisement for the Book of the Short Sun.  Of course, as is the\nway of the SFBC, it makes the book sound terribly pulp-sci-fi-ish.  (. . .\nthe inhumi, blood drinking aliens who take human form. . . )  It even seems\nto give away quiet a bit.  The last paragraph reads: \"As his inability to\nfind Silk weights heavily on his mind, Horn if further tormented by the fact\nthat his new body bears a striking resemblance to the lost Calde.  In the\nend, he will have to answer a troubling question: has he truly failed in his\nsworn task, or has he become the very man he sought?\"\n    I'm not complaining though, because it also includes a \"note from the\nauthor\".  Gene Wolfe writes:  \"At the end of the 18th Century, serious\nscientists denied that stones could fall from the sky.  At the end of this\none, very few still insist that phenomena incapable of proof are beyond the\nrealm of possibility.  We may doubt telepathy, ghost, and precognition-\nindeed, we should doubt them.  But we cannot rule them out altogether.  That\nphenomenon most often called astral projection plays a part in these books. \n(So does space travel, which most adults derided as utterly impossible not so\nlong ago.)\"  And here's what really got me: \"Accept it for the sake of the\nstory, and you may learn the identity of Master Malrubius's ghost.\"  (My\nemphasis.)  Wow.  That makes my head spin.  I didn't even think of that, and\nif I remember, no one on here has discussed it much.  Who then, was Master\nMalrubius's ghost?"
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Apparently the the astral projection of Hornsilk was.\n\nWell, well. Congratulations, Ian. Confirmation from the horse's mouth.\n\nGene Wolfe seems to have at least a mild case of Asimov's syndrome. I \nhope he recovers before his next book.\n\nWilliam Ansley\n\n*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun."
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}