SS Stuff on a Monday

Michael, no, your theory, attractive though it is (I love the idea of embarassing vampires to death...), simply doesn't fit with many of the Narr's statements about the nature of the SotI. While pricking them in the vanity might do any number of things to the Inhumi, causing them to become mindless leechagators is just not a likely result. Okay, now as to the utopia thing. There definitely does seem to be an aspect of that in SS. Some aspects worth considering: 1) It's clearly a form of the Hero's Journey. 2) If Wolfe is going to write a Utopia, it will be a Christian utopia -- which is almost a contradiction in terms, given the Christian belief that "this world" is radically Fallen and no true utopia is possible short of Heaven. But and counterweighting this we need also to remember that the word "utopia" comes from the Catholic St. Sir Thomas More, and did not, in his hands, mean a "perfect" state so much as an optimal one. 3) It's also in dialogue with several other things besides KSR's Mars books (which I haven't read, btw: are they really worth the effort?). a) Another three-volume hero's journey: Dante. Nell mezzo del camino de whatever Horn finds himself all at sea (so to speak), lost. His journeys lead him through Hell (Green), Purgatory (the Whorl), and ultimately to, uh, well, that's where it gets kind of complicated... But there's also a political Commedia here, as the Narrator journeys through hell (the theo-monarchies of OBW), purgatory (the Italianate city-states of IGJ), and paradise (the democracy of Dorp and the jolly quasi-anarchy of NV), only political "paradise" ain't no paradise anyway, which leads me to point b. b) Another well-known SF political "utopian" novel featuring twin worlds, where the Hero's Journey leads him to realize that political utopia ain't going to happen? I refer, of course, to Le Guin's THE DISPOSSESSED. (Btw, if we take it that this dialog is intended-- and I think a strong case can be made for this -- then there is also an implicit dialog with Delany's [TROUBLE ON] TRITON.) c) And, of course, it is in dialog with (and implicitly critiques, if only by differentiae) the LONG and NEW SUN books. I think I'll go take my medication now. *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

Well, I haven't got much to say on this other than to direct your attention to: http://world.std.com/~pduggan/wolfeint.html

I'll add that I agree with Wolfe about THE DISPOSSESSED. It plus THE LEFT HAND OF DARKNESS stands as my examplar of how even when the prose quality is uniformly excellent, a writer can vary wildly in quality. Also, I still like Short Sun despite remaining clueless about the many apparent red herrings it introduces. The emotional impact didn't feel forced or as if he were tired of the series to me--although it did feel as if Silk/Horn was tired of writing.

My original theory was that the Narrator meant this metaphorically. That if humans knew what the inhumi were, then they would regard them as mindless leechagators, rather than intellegent, possibly superior predators. The inhumi want to be taken for human, but they'll settle for Count Dracula (judging from Krait's initial encounters with Horn) so long as they don't have to be mere vampire bats. On re-reading OBW, I see that the Rajan's words are hard to take metaphorically (he talks about the inhumi possibly being better off as mindless reptiles)--of course this is the same guy who claims to think Silk might be living on Green or some other continent of Blue and who claims to believe that hogwash about inhumi flying from Green to Blue, so what does he know! Seriously, it could be both: loving each other would mean the inhumi could no longer prey on humans and would lose their intelligence, but the Rajan also says that this is not the Secret that the inhumi are hunting him for. So the Secret could still be that they want to be human.

I take this to mean that the weapon is not too heavy to wield at all, but too heavy to wield responsibly. It would be too cruel (yes, more cruel even than burying them alive--how many inhumi claim to prefer death to abandoning the dreamwalking worlds where they seem fully human?) and Silkhorn believes that by exercising such cruelty, humans would ultimately harm themselves as well as the inhumi. Further evidence: It is Hornsilk's harsh frustration of Juganu's desire to experience human life on Urth that seems to lead to the inhumi attack. Other inhumi he adopted and treated as human, and they seem to have loved him in return, but he rubs Juganu's face in his inhumanity and it enrages him. -Rostrum *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

I like this, though I don't know if Wolfe intended it. But surely Purgatory would be the Whorl and Blue, with the conversation with Remora corresponding to the final purging of Dante's sins; and the undepicted voyage to the stars would be the Paradiso. That would make either Seawrack or Nettle Beatrice; either would fit. But who is Virgil, then? Since Virgil left Dante at the end of the Purgatorio, the logical candidate would be Horn's spirit, which (as I've argued before) leaves Silk's body around this time; which would mean that it is Silk who corresponds to Dante. But Silk wasn't on Green, except in astral form, and that came after the Whorl, so this doesn't fit.

This, otoh, I don't see. There's no significant difference in forms of governance between the city-states of IGJ and those of RttW, as far as I remember; if anything, Blanko is better governed than either Dorp or New Viron. And anyway, Dante liked theo-monarchies. --Adam *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.