The Secret: protection, not conversion (actual

The Whorl list — 1 messages, 1 voices, 26 Apr 2001
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/1410

Dan'l Danehy-Oakes26 Apr 2001, 13:35original
8 quoted lines
Adam wrote: I have to abandon my nice new theory on the Secret. I just noticed that on p. 350 of the hardback OBW, Horn says: "If only we protected one another, they would all be idiots or worse. As it is, they always get enough to keep them going." So it has to be boring old keep-everybody-safe, not the idea that the inhumi will become good by drinking the blood of good people, attractive though this is.
Good catch, good call. I'm afraid I also have to abandon my own theorizing about a grand communion of humans and human-inhumi, in favor of what you say; in which case the "grand communion" becomes a blasphemous parody of the Eucharist ... which makes sense. Neither of the Eucharistic scenes we're shown involve the inhumi in any way, and neither involve physical blood. (I am using the word "physical" to avoid a whole set of metaphysical [in the sense of Aristotle and Aquinas] issues about in what sense the Eucharistic species "are" the flesh & blood of Christ, which I presume are not of general interest.) So we're back to "protect one another?" H'mm... Okay, if Silk is a Moses-figure (which makes far more sense than a Christ-figure), then we're talking about a people living under Law and Justice rather than (explicit) Grace. "Protect one another," and especially the idea of protecting the poor (and, somewhat by implication, the idea of protecting the "stranger") fits. --Dan'l *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.