# Wombat's Wolfe Seminar

*The Whorl list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 03 Jun 2001*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/1428>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### Michael Andre-Driussi
*03 Jun 2001, 08:54*

>> Wombat quoted and wrote:
>> OTOH, it does lead to an interesting notion: what if, instead of a FAQ
>> about a book/series/story, what if there was a position tabulation, sort of
>> like a voting ballet, showing broad points ("Participants like the piece"
>> xx%; "Respondents dislike the piece" xx%), then medium points, down to fine
>> detail points?

> Ahah! The Wolfe Seminar! We could all get pink, red, grey, and black balls
> and vote on whether Severian is his own mother....

Which makes me think it might come out more like "Family Feuuud": "Survey
says . . . BOOK OF THE NEW SUN	is a good read!" <g>

But that would be fine on two counts: it would still do the job; it would
reflect the family feud nature of the discussions.<g>

=mantis=


Sirius Fiction
Has Moved To
http://www.siriusfiction.com/



*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

---

### Alice Turner
*04 Jun 2001, 12:09 · follows Michael Andre-Driussi*

>> Ahah! The Wolfe Seminar! We could all get pink, red, grey, and black
>> balls
>> and vote on whether Severian is his own mother....

> Which makes me think it might come out more like "Family Feuuud":

"Survey

> says . . . BOOK OF THE NEW SUN is a good read!" <g>
> 
> But that would be fine on two counts: it would still do the job; it
> would
> reflect the family feud nature of the discussions.<g>

What, us feud?

-alga


*This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

---
