{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/1498",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "whorl",
  "thread": {
    "id": 1498,
    "subject": "dual list discussion",
    "messages": 2,
    "voices": 2,
    "first": "2001-12-10T00:53:22+00:00",
    "last": "2001-12-10T16:34:39+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<whorl-v0013-whorl.v012.n173.1@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "j e",
        "address": "lo_phan17 at hotmail.com"
      },
      "date": "2001-12-10T00:53:22+00:00",
      "subject": "dual list discussion",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Hello everyone\nI'm a long time lurker but looking to post more often. I'm for one list but \nwould prefer it Wolfe only. Pullman and Crowley may be fine writers, worthy \nof some of the fine-toothedness I've seen demonstrated here, but I'd prefer \na Wolfe-dedicated discussion. Ranjit, is it possible to have a Wolfe list \nand a more open, general discussion list? I don't know how the financial \nside of whorl hosting works or what options you have but it seems to me \nyou've enabled the formation of a community and it would be interesting to \nsee the scope of exchange broadened. Anyone else feel similarly?\n\nAs for a handle I'm picking one that's seems both whorlly and close to my \nown name - Eule."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<whorl-v0013-whorl.v012.n173.3@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Dan'l Danehy-Oakes",
        "address": "ddanehy at siebel.com"
      },
      "date": "2001-12-10T16:34:39+00:00",
      "subject": "RE: (whorl) dual list discussion",
      "in_reply_to": "<whorl-v0013-whorl.v012.n173.1@digest.urth.net>",
      "reply_link": "subject",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "Eule wrote: \nHello everyone\nI'm a long time lurker but looking to post more often. I'm for one\nlist but would prefer it Wolfe only. ... Ranjit, is it possible to \nhave a Wolfe list and a more open, general discussion list? "
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Actually this isn't a bad idea a-tall: One list for Wolfe discussion\nand one for other \"Lupine\" writers. Except, of course, that the second\nlist quickly becomes a combination general literary discussion and\nargument about \"what is Lupine,\" so its value might fall into\nquestion fairly quickly. Or maybe not. I like the idea if it could\nbe handled well.\n\nH'mmmm. How about this: One main list, one to which we _move_ \ndiscussions when they wander off the immediately Lupine? And what to \ncall such lists?\n\n\"Wolfe\" and \"Dogge\"? \n\n\"Lupine\" and \"Quasilupine?\"\n\n\"Whorl\" and \"Swirl?\"\n\n\"Urth\" and \"Sky\"?\n\n\"Fred\" and \"Ethel\"?\n\n\"Wolfetrain\" and \"Sidecar\"?"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}