Inhumi
The Whorl list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 16 Jan 1997
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/27

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
in each message remains with the person who wrote it.

Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

==============================================================================

Jim Jordan — 16 Jan 1997, 13:16

> At 12:21 PM 1/16/97 -0500, you wrote:
> 
> I started rereading "Exodus.." last night, and started with the Dramatis
> Personae.  Sure enough, Teasel's entry says she was attacked by an
> inhumi.  In fact, she's not the only one listed as such there.  I'll
> leave the other as an exercise.  This (for me at least) puts a slightly
> altered spin on Quetzal.
> 
>     Dave Lebling

AN inhumi! AHA! Maybe there are more than one? Maybe Quetzal is indeed a
"converted" inhumi, and thus his alliance with Silk? Maybe....

Those re-reading the quartet can do us a favor by paying close attention to
this question. Is there evidence that Quetzal has altered his
beliefs/behavior at some time in the past? We know from Book 4 that he is
familiar with the Jesus of this universe. On the other hand, he advises
that the settlers go to the wrong planet -- or so it seems (never try to
guess where Wolfe will go -- maybe Quetzal's advice was right!)

Theologically, with Quetzal as "pope" of the local church situation, we are
in the realm of good Catholic (RC) thought. The Pope is the vicar of
Christ, and therefore a bad (serpentine) Pope is the vicar of Anti-Christ.
The Protestant Reformers said that the whole Papacy, and thus all Popes,
were involved with Anti-Christ, but long before then Medieval theologians
had said that some Popes had been agents of Anti-Christ. --- Yet Quetzal
might be a "converted" serpent. The ambiguity is certainly there in my mind
at present. Can we find enough clues to decide for sure? I'll be interested
to see what the re-readers find for us on this one!

Or: Is Quetzal the serpent in the garden? Or: Are the inhumi in general the
serpent in the garden? The latter seems clear enough, and probably can be
expanded by a theologically-sensitive reading of the quartet. (I can't wait
until I find the time to do it myself!)

Jim Jordan


Questions or problems to whorl-owner at lists.best.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CoxRathvon — 17 Jan 1997, 12:00
  follows, by subject match Jim Jordan

Thanks to everyone posting to this group!  I feel I get a little insight from
every message.

As I re-re-read the quartet of "Long Sun" books, I'm keeping my eye on
Quetzal.  It's pretty clear that he preyed on Teasel and Mattak; I can't find
a hint about any other such attack, nor do I find a reference to any other
inhumi aboard the Whorl--except for that revealing remark by Patera Pike that
"devils" had infiltrated the Whorl against the wishes of Pas.  Very
mysterious comment, that.  

Like a total dope I first read "Exodus" without browsing the introductory
list of "Gods, Persons, and Animals Mentioned in the Text," so I missed a
couple huge hints about Quetzal and the inhumi.   I did accidentally bump
into the reference to Horn as "the colonist who undertook to write the Book
of Silk"--but I figured "The Book of Silk" would get mentioned near the end
of the story; I wasn't prepared for that book to be Wolfe's  "Long Sun"
itself!!!

--Henry Rathvon


Questions or problems to whorl-owner at lists.best.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------