Pike's Ghost

The Whorl list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 24 Jun 1997
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/366

Alice Turner24 Jun 1997, 16:06original
mantis, Vance is right--we should clear up Pike's ghost. Couldn't it be a "baker's dozen" or "one-to-grow-on" question from all of us as a group on top of our individual questions? I think the wording should be more specific---Weasel should be Wolfe's Vironese name! What about: "Is the apparation at the top of the stairs that Silk takes for Pike's ghost really a form (i.e. aquastor/eidolon) of Pike? If not, who or what is it?" Alternately, "Is 'Pike's ghost' really Quetzal? If not, who or what is it?" -alga
m.driussi24 Jun 1997, 21:14original

↳ follows, by subject match Alice Turner

Reply: Item #7269253 from WHORL at LISTS.BEST.COM@INET00# alga, True, further questions might help. And multiple choice would narrow it down. Since Wolfe wrote "it wasn't machine made," I'm inclined to think that Pike's ghost is neither aquastor nor eidolon--not wanting to drive into the but-an-AI-computer-isn't-a-machine avenue (I think it would be a blind alley). So it seems to me we are down to two candidates: alien (inhumu, Quetzal or some other one) and miraculous (along the lines of the enlightenments--i.e., it is a real ghost). The thing seems to have physical presence--wears the beanie, after all. Therefore, your second version: "Is `Pike's ghost' really Quetezal? If not, who or what is it?" appears to fit the bill. And, if we don't get a whole bunch of questions from new people, then we can let it be yours. (Or vizcacha's, if he wants to use it as his follow-up.) =mantis=

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.