{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/408",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "whorl",
  "thread": {
    "id": 408,
    "subject": "Monitors",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "1997-07-15T16:24:38+00:00",
    "last": "1997-07-15T16:24:38+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<whorl-v0007-0526@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Joel Priddy",
        "address": "jpriddy at saturn.vcu.edu"
      },
      "date": "1997-07-15T16:24:38+00:00",
      "subject": "(whorl) Monitors",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Kevin McGuire say:"
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 2,
          "text": "This implies a lot more initiative and synthesis than I had\ngiven the monitors credit for.  So, does Silk and the rest\ncontinually underestimate the monitor's powers (a not"
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "unreasonable thought) or is the monitor in the lander a bit\nsharper/more independent?  Or was there a Monitor Directive #305\n- \"If an inhumi says left, go right,\"?<<\n\nAlso, did the Monitor reverse the decision out of concern for the\nCargo, or out of it's own sense of self-preservation?\n\ncephalothorax"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}