{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/434",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "whorl",
  "thread": {
    "id": 434,
    "subject": "Typos",
    "messages": 3,
    "voices": 3,
    "first": "1997-09-10T08:44:03+00:00",
    "last": "1997-09-11T00:16:58+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<whorl-v0007-0574@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Michael Straight",
        "address": "straight at email.unc.edu"
      },
      "date": "1997-09-10T08:44:03+00:00",
      "subject": "(whorl) Typos",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "On Tue, 9 Sep 1997 m.driussi at genie.com wrote:\nIn the other direction, I still find it hard to believe that the\nMarble/Mint merger was just the two typos Wolfe says it was.  Even though\nI don't know what a Marble/Mint merger would mean, let alone how it\ncould be done!"
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Speaking of which, I wonder if there's any chance those typos will be\nfixed when they release Exodus in paperback.\n\n-Rostrum"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<whorl-v0007-0575@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "m.driussi",
        "address": "m.driussi at genie.com"
      },
      "date": "1997-09-10T15:47:00+00:00",
      "subject": "(whorl) Typos",
      "in_reply_to": "<whorl-v0007-0574@digest.urth.net>",
      "reply_link": "subject",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Reply:  Item #6279912 from WHORL at LISTS.BEST.COM@INET02#\n\nRostrum,\n\nThese days I hold my breath and hope that more typos aren't added.\n<cue: ranting about omnibus of Vance's PLANET OF ADVENTURE> Your\nmention of it makes me think fleetingly of submitting a list of clear\ntypos (nevermind those two stealthies), but nah, that would only make\nme more crazy.\n\nnewt,\n\nInteresting point, re: the unambiguous/beat-reader-over-head with\nChristianity mode of C.S. Lewis.  Can we take this a little further?\nMy personal sense of Cordwainer Smith is that his work is somewhat\ncloser to the mode of Lewis than the mode of Wolfe (I readily admit I\nprefer Smith over Lewis).  Would you agree?  (How about you, alga?)\nNot to denigrate any of these authors, just arranging them in a\nspectrum.  (The Chesterton of THE MAN WHO WAS THURSDAY to my mind is\ndefinitely at the Wolfe end of the spectrum.)\n\n=mantis="
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "message_id": "<whorl-v0007-0576@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Jim Jordan",
        "address": "jbjordan at gnt.net"
      },
      "date": "1997-09-11T00:16:58+00:00",
      "subject": "Re: (whorl) Typos",
      "in_reply_to": "<whorl-v0007-0575@digest.urth.net>",
      "reply_link": "subject",
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "At 03:47 PM 9/10/97 GMT, Mantis wrote:\n\nThese days I hold my breath and hope that more typos aren't added.\n<cue: ranting about omnibus of Vance's PLANET OF ADVENTURE> Your\nmention of it makes me think fleetingly of submitting a list of clear\ntypos (nevermind those two stealthies), but nah, that would only make\nme more crazy."
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "\tCould you or someone post the places where the typos in Long Sun are located?"
        },
        {
          "kind": "quote",
          "depth": 1,
          "text": "Interesting point, re: the unambiguous/beat-reader-over-head with\nChristianity mode of C.S. Lewis.  Can we take this a little further?\nMy personal sense of Cordwainer Smith is that his work is somewhat\ncloser to the mode of Lewis than the mode of Wolfe (I readily admit I\nprefer Smith over Lewis).  Would you agree?  (How about you, alga?)"
        },
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "\tJumping in, I myself much prefer Smith to Lewis, and agree that he is not\nambiguous (though sometimes difficult). Thematically he is (was) very close\nto Wolfe, but stylistically quite different, no?\n\nNutricious"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}