# Cordwainer Smith reading order -- dissent

*The Whorl list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 12 Sep 1997*

<https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/439>

> Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright
> in each message remains with the person who wrote it.
> Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original
> archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than
> retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.

---

### David_Lebling
*12 Sep 1997, 09:18*

Rostrum, Nutria, alga, et al.,

I'd have to disagree slightly with the Rodent of Unusual Size.

Don't read Smith in the chronological order set out in the NESFA books
(but do buy them -- run, do not walk!).

Read "The Ballad of Lost C'mell," then "Scanners Live in Vain," then
"The Game of Rat and Dragon."  After that, I would move on to "Alpha
Ralpha Boulevard" and eventually "Norstrilia."  Read "On the ... Planet"
(really a novel in three episodes) last.  Read the very early stuff and
the very late stuff (including posthumous collaborations with his wife,
Genevieve) only if you feel the need.  (Although, "Western Science is So
Wonderful" is an absolute hoot -- more like Rudy Rucker than Smith).

The idea is that you should read the middle stories, where the
Instrumentality figures prominently, first. You should absorb the
stories like you would absorb a huge, complex tapestry -- the
publication order would be better than the "history" order, but still
start with C'mell and Lord Jestocost.  Also, don't read the
introductions, timelines and afterwords until you've read everything
else.

No one should read the Narnia books starting with "The Magician's
Nephew."  No one should read Smith starting with "War 81-Q" (or whatever
else is first).

I am Of a Certain Age, and started reading the late, lamented Galaxy
about when "The Ballad of Lost C'mell" was published.  I was hooked, and
a great deal of the wonder of it all was figuring out what was going on
in the whole future span Smith imagined.

As they say, "the Golden Age of Science Fiction is twelve."

     -- vizcacha
     (david_lebling at avid.com)

ps: It is such a pleasure to find other Wolfe fans out there, and to
have them be Smith fans as well!  Ah, bliss.

---

### Kevin J. Maroney
*12 Sep 1997, 11:22 · follows David_Lebling*

> At 09:18 AM 9/12/97 -0400, you wrote:
> Read "The Ballad of Lost C'mell," then "Scanners Live in Vain," then
> "The Game of Rat and Dragon."  After that, I would move on to "Alpha
> Ralpha Boulevard" and eventually "Norstrilia."  

Hmm. I've read only the Smith stories that were in the Del Rey "Best of"
volume (boy, I miss those!)--I have the NESFA volume and just haven't read
it yet. I seem to be alone in liking Smith and not particularly liking "The
Ballad of Lost C'Mell", prefering (by a wide margin) "Scanners", "Rat and
Dragon", and "Alpha Ralpha".

Regardless, no one who takes sf seriously, or who likes Wolfe, should be
without first-hand knowledge of Cordwainer Smith. 


Wombat, a.k.a. Kevin Maroney kmaroney at crossover.com
Kitchen Staff Supervisor, New York Review of Science Fiction
http://ebbs.english.vt.edu/olp/nyrsf/nyrsf.html

---
