On Blue's Waters [Wolfe self-reference?][no actual spoilers]

The Whorl list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 24 Sep 1999
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/635

David_Lebling24 Sep 1999, 13:52original
Horn runs through other versions of Silk's story (Horn's is The Book of the Long Sun, commonly known as The Book of Silk). One he mentions that he hasn't read was written by a man in the city of Urbasecundus, in English "Second City." Now, what large city with that sobriquet does Wolfe live near? (I've read two chapters and already have several mysteries to think about, and at least one from tBotLS elucidated -- more on that later.) --Dave Lebling (aka vizcacha) *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.
Alastair Reynolds25 Sep 1999, 10:00original

↳ follows, by subject match David_Lebling

6 quoted lines
Horn runs through other versions of Silk's story (Horn's is The Book of the Long Sun, commonly known as The Book of Silk). One he mentions that he hasn't read was written by a man in the city of Urbasecundus, in English "Second City." Now, what large city with that sobriquet does Wolfe live near? (I've read two chapters and already have several mysteries to think about, and at least one from tBotLS elucidated -- more on that later.) --Dave Lebling (aka vizcacha)
So where does GW live? Is it Chicago? Funnily enough, (because I only noticed it yesterday) in the Fifth Head of Cerberus, he mentions a book called Monday or Tuesday, leaning against a book on the assassination of Trotsky. Since the Trotsky book must have been written by Trotsky's bodyguard, Bernard "Limbo" Wolfe, I presume we're meant to conclude that the other book, if they're filed alphabetically, is by GW... Al *This is WHORL, for discussion of Gene Wolfe's Book of the Long Sun.

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.