{
  "export": {
    "source": "https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/927",
    "note": "Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it.  Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.",
    "addresses": "obscured as 'user at host'"
  },
  "archive": "whorl",
  "thread": {
    "id": 927,
    "subject": "Digest whorl.v011.n014",
    "messages": 1,
    "voices": 1,
    "first": "2000-08-10T18:04:19+00:00",
    "last": "2000-08-10T18:04:19+00:00"
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "message_id": "<whorl-v0011-0089@digest.urth.net>",
      "from": {
        "name": "Christopher Culver",
        "address": "new_sun at hotmail.com"
      },
      "date": "2000-08-10T18:04:19+00:00",
      "subject": "(whorl) Re: Digest whorl.v011.n014",
      "in_reply_to": null,
      "reply_link": null,
      "blocks": [
        {
          "kind": "text",
          "depth": 0,
          "text": "Pat. Nut. wrote:\n<Dire interpretations of Wolfe events are tempting, but recall how often\nthey have been wrong. Weer in *Peace* was supposed to be a multiple\nmurderer, according to some, until Wolfe said that was nonsense.>\n\nWolfe may have said that about the *multiple* murderer hypothesis, but in \none interview he said the reader would have to figure out for himself if \nWeer killed the librarian, and he didn't say that suspicion of that would be \nnonsense.\n\nChristopher CULVER <new_sun at hotmail.com>"
        }
      ]
    }
  ]
}