Clute's review of IGJ

The Whorl list — 2 messages, 2 voices, 15 Aug 2000
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/whorl/938

Nicholas Gevers15 Aug 2000, 18:42original
SF WEEKLY has just published John Clute's review of IN GREEN'S JUNGLES, and (among other remarks of interest) Clute declares that it is "reasonably clear" that Horn/Silk is himself an inhumu. Any reactions?
Sheila Herndon16 Aug 2000, 11:30original

↳ follows, by subject match Nicholas Gevers

9 quoted lines
--------------- MESSAGE whorl.v011.n018.3 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Nicholas=20Gevers?= <vermoulian at yahoo.com>
SF WEEKLY has just published John Clute's review of IN GREEN'S JUNGLES, and (among other remarks of interest) Clute declares that it is "reasonably clear" that Horn/Silk is himself an inhumu. Any reactions?
delurking - well, I have been wondering about that. Horn goes on and on to Hide about how to detect Inhumu - make-up, scales, lack of eating. And near to this point, Horn repeatedly talks about his lack of eating. Also, perhaps the "suicide" scene with who we presume to be Silk is actually a scene with an Inhumu who has fed on Silk (blood everywhere) and has part of Silk's essense, and Horn is transported into the Silk/Inhumu body. But no one ever comments on Horn's appearance (wrt the other warning signs of an inhumu). I also cannot remmeber temperature conversations - that would be another telling point. sh

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.