-
No problem. I'm just glad to get an answer. Hey, you think you need chastised . . . . I haven't looked at e-mail recently -- this is the first time since I sent my note. I sent t…
21 Jun 2005, 13:08
-
Okay, the abbreviation "DADoES" is probably familiar enough to SF fans, even without my inclusion above of the improbably capitalized "do androids dream of electric sheep." But "G…
16 Jun 2005, 19:54
-
Of course not! This is Wolfe we're dealing with. I'll check out CITADEL. Your explanation clearly establishes the expanding and collapsing universes, but I don't see where it show…
31 Mar 2005, 16:51
-
Actually, I like the idea, too. There are, uh, cycles within the Cycle, and this idea undergirds the vastness of that proposition. From what I've read on this list and its now-de…
31 Mar 2005, 15:11
-
I've never understood the fascination with the "previous universe" theory, no matter what Wolfe said after writing the books. Surely the text of the books trumps post-book statem…
31 Mar 2005, 09:23
-
Actually, I did. The archives are only updated through the end of February. My suspected problems started around the first of March. The archives didn't tell me much. -- …
11 Mar 2005, 16:35
Urth Net