Voided cross

The Urth list — 3 messages, 3 voices, 15 May 2005
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4422

Daniel D Jones15 May 2005, 10:16
Is there a consensus of what the "voided cross" looks like in the BOTLS?
pthwndxrclzp15 May 2005, 11:46

↳ in reply to Daniel D Jones

I always figured it looked something like this (forgive the ASCII non-art): xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx x x xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This also fits in with the "Sign of Addition" stuff, as far as I see it (though that may be so obvious it's not worth mentioning). Aq
3 quoted lines
On 5/15/05, Daniel D Jones <ddjones at riddlemaster.org> wrote: Is there a consensus of what the "voided cross" looks like in the BOTLS? _______________________________________________
James Wynn15 May 2005, 15:12

↳ in reply to Daniel D Jones

Like this: http://www.urth.org/whorlmap/voided_cross.htm The article is unfinished but the voided cross graphic is accurate, I believe. Crush ----- Original Message -----
6 quoted lines
From: "Daniel D Jones" <ddjones at riddlemaster.org> To: <urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net> Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 12:14 PM Subject: (urth) Voided cross Is there a consensus of what the "voided cross" looks like in the BOTLS? _______________________________________________

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.