Urth Net
Voided cross
Is there a consensus of what the "voided cross" looks like in the BOTLS?
Index · 3 messages · 3 voices · 15 May 2005
Voided cross
↳ in reply to
Daniel D Jones
I always figured it looked something like this (forgive the ASCII non-art):
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
x x
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This also fits in with the "Sign of Addition" stuff, as far as I see it (though that may be so obvious it's not worth mentioning).
Aq
3 quoted lines
On 5/15/05, Daniel D Jones <ddjones at riddlemaster.org> wrote:
Is there a consensus of what the "voided cross" looks like in the BOTLS?
_______________________________________________
↳ in reply to
Daniel D Jones
Like this:
http://www.urth.org/whorlmap/voided_cross.htm
The article is unfinished but the voided cross graphic is accurate, I believe.
Crush
----- Original Message -----
6 quoted lines
From: "Daniel D Jones" <ddjones at riddlemaster.org>
To: <urth-urth.net at lists.urth.net>
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 12:14 PM
Subject: (urth) Voided cross
Is there a consensus of what the "voided cross" looks like in the BOTLS?
_______________________________________________
An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net