TWK: Able's future
The Urth list — 5 messages, 4 voices, 07 Dec 2005
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/4523
Roy C. Lackey07 Dec 2005, 05:09
Last month I wrote:
[snip]
1 quoted line · depth 2
And, at the end, even though Able turned his back on Skai, it seems he will be given a position in a still higher realm than Skai;<< [snip]
That can't be right. There's no place up for him to go but Kleos. Able's association with Michael is not enough to get him to Kleos. Able wrote from Aelfrice, where he saw the events in Mythgarthr play out across the sky. He mentioned a future time when he will return to Mythgarthr. The "great lord" mentioned by Michael as being in need of a champion is not God, who has no need of one, least of all in Kleos. We are told that there are other worlds on all the levels except the first and last. It may be that the "great lord" in need of a champion is on another world on the fourth level, a world other than Dream or Mythgarthr. Maybe our own. It may even be that the "great lord" is on a world on the third level other than the Valfather's. That might be the explanation for the apparent mixing of unrelated Celtic (Gawain) and Norse traditions that Able seems to have experienced, a cross-contamination of worlds in the same way that he went from America to Mythgarthr.
-Roy
James Wynn07 Dec 2005, 05:34
↳ in reply to Roy C. Lackey
Roy says:
1 quoted line
That can't be right. There's no place up for him to go but Kleos. Able's association with Michael is not enough to get him to Kleos.
Hmm...maybe. But why would Michael seek Able's help for a lord in Skai? Michael went seeking Able--seeking an Able that didn't exist when Able first met him. The idea of proceeding ever upwards seems to be the overall theme of the novel. Michael is only the second person from Kleos (at best) that Able has met. Is it surprising that Able would be a hero in Kleos? Look how quickly Able seems to have risen to prominence in Skai.
J
Roy C. Lackey07 Dec 2005, 20:52
↳ follows, by subject match James Wynn
4 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
Crush quoted and wrote:
Roy says:
That can't be right. There's no place up for him to go but Kleos. Able's association with Michael is not enough to get him to Kleos.
Hmm...maybe. But why would Michael seek Able's help for a lord in Skai? Michael went seeking Able--seeking an Able that didn't exist when Able first met him. The idea of proceeding ever upwards seems to be the overall theme of the novel. Michael is only the second person from Kleos (at best) that Able has met. Is it surprising that Able would be a hero in Kleos? Look how quickly Able seems to have risen to prominence in Skai.
It would surprise the hell out of me for Able to even get to Kleos, much less be a hero there. As hartshorn said in another context, Able is a knight not a saint. Just who would a crude dude like Able fight in God's backyard? Kleos was a place made by God as a reward for the "servants" he had created. (W, 46) (I think those "servants" are what are usually called angels.)
Because anything apart from God is by definition less than perfect, those servants were unhappy with that imperfection in Kleos. They wanted to cast out as much of that imperfection as they could. God created a place for them to put it, which was Skai. The imperfection was embodied in the form of the giant Ymir. "Some servants of the Highest God surrendered their places in Kleos and went down to kill him. They did, but they could never go back." (ibid.) Some hold that the Valfather was one of those who descended and could never return. (48) (Echoed by Able leaving Skai?) The farther removed from God's perfection, the worse the corruption, descending by degrees to evil.
Able was no angel, and I don't think he ever would/could be. I don't think it's even theoretically possible for a post-creation being to attain the status of a pre-creation being. But this begins to stray into religious territory it's probably better not to traverse.
I don't think Able was all that prominent in Skai; clearly he was nowhere near as powerful as the Valfather and his immediate family, and/or the other original "servants" of God.
Michael didn't meet Able in Kleos, so clearly he had come down from his high place. Presumably he was able to return, unlike his brother servants/angels who went down to Skai. What's the difference?
-Roy
don doggett10 Dec 2005, 04:12
↳ in reply to Roy C. Lackey
8 quoted lines
--- "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net> wrote:
Michael didn't meet Able in Kleos, so clearly he had
come down from his high
place. Presumably he was able to return, unlike his
brother servants/angels
who went down to Skai. What's the difference?
-Roy
Angels are by definition messengers of God, so it only
makes sense that Michael can travel wherever he needs
to do his duties. Able is special because he is human.
According to Christian belief, we are God's special
children and this whole setup is for our benefit,
though we are unworthy of it. At least that's my
understanding. I'm not sure I buy that in the "real
world" but for the purpose of story that's the
situation. I think.
Don
Andy Robertson10 Dec 2005, 09:22
↳ in reply to don doggett
don doggett writes:
3 quoted lines
According to Christian belief, we are God's special
children and this whole setup is for our benefit,
though we are unworthy of it.
I don't believe this is the case in any of Wolfe's fictional universes. Humans may be special, but so are the Neighbours. Everyone is special.
I suspect the thing that bound the descended angels to Skai was probably the slaying of Ymir and the shedding of Ymir's blood.
Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.