Urth Net

Index · 5 messages · 4 voices · 07 Dec – 10 Dec 2005

TWK: Able's future

Download this conversation
Roy C. Lackey07 Dec 2005, 05:09as archived
TWK: Able's future
Last month I wrote: [snip]
1 quoted line · depth 2
And, at the end, even though Able turned his back on Skai, it seems he will be given a position in a still higher realm than Skai;<< [snip]
That can't be right. There's no place up for him to go but Kleos. Able's association with Michael is not enough to get him to Kleos. Able wrote from Aelfrice, where he saw the events in Mythgarthr play out across the sky. He mentioned a future time when he will return to Mythgarthr. The "great lord" mentioned by Michael as being in need of a champion is not God, who has no need of one, least of all in Kleos. We are told that there are other worlds on all the levels except the first and last. It may be that the "great lord" in need of a champion is on another world on the fourth level, a world other than Dream or Mythgarthr. Maybe our own. It may even be that the "great lord" is on a world on the third level other than the Valfather's. That might be the explanation for the apparent mixing of unrelated Celtic (Gawain) and Norse traditions that Able seems to have experienced, a cross-contamination of worlds in the same way that he went from America to Mythgarthr. -Roy
James Wynn07 Dec 2005, 05:34as archived
↳ in reply to Roy C. Lackey
Roy says:
1 quoted line
That can't be right. There's no place up for him to go but Kleos. Able's association with Michael is not enough to get him to Kleos.
Hmm...maybe. But why would Michael seek Able's help for a lord in Skai? Michael went seeking Able--seeking an Able that didn't exist when Able first met him. The idea of proceeding ever upwards seems to be the overall theme of the novel. Michael is only the second person from Kleos (at best) that Able has met. Is it surprising that Able would be a hero in Kleos? Look how quickly Able seems to have risen to prominence in Skai. J
Roy C. Lackey07 Dec 2005, 20:52as archived
↳ follows James Wynn · by subject
4 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
Crush quoted and wrote: Roy says:
That can't be right. There's no place up for him to go but Kleos. Able's association with Michael is not enough to get him to Kleos.
Hmm...maybe. But why would Michael seek Able's help for a lord in Skai? Michael went seeking Able--seeking an Able that didn't exist when Able first met him. The idea of proceeding ever upwards seems to be the overall theme of the novel. Michael is only the second person from Kleos (at best) that Able has met. Is it surprising that Able would be a hero in Kleos? Look how quickly Able seems to have risen to prominence in Skai.
It would surprise the hell out of me for Able to even get to Kleos, much less be a hero there. As hartshorn said in another context, Able is a knight not a saint. Just who would a crude dude like Able fight in God's backyard? Kleos was a place made by God as a reward for the "servants" he had created. (W, 46) (I think those "servants" are what are usually called angels.) Because anything apart from God is by definition less than perfect, those servants were unhappy with that imperfection in Kleos. They wanted to cast out as much of that imperfection as they could. God created a place for them to put it, which was Skai. The imperfection was embodied in the form of the giant Ymir. "Some servants of the Highest God surrendered their places in Kleos and went down to kill him. They did, but they could never go back." (ibid.) Some hold that the Valfather was one of those who descended and could never return. (48) (Echoed by Able leaving Skai?) The farther removed from God's perfection, the worse the corruption, descending by degrees to evil. Able was no angel, and I don't think he ever would/could be. I don't think it's even theoretically possible for a post-creation being to attain the status of a pre-creation being. But this begins to stray into religious territory it's probably better not to traverse. I don't think Able was all that prominent in Skai; clearly he was nowhere near as powerful as the Valfather and his immediate family, and/or the other original "servants" of God. Michael didn't meet Able in Kleos, so clearly he had come down from his high place. Presumably he was able to return, unlike his brother servants/angels who went down to Skai. What's the difference? -Roy
don doggett10 Dec 2005, 04:12as archived
↳ in reply to Roy C. Lackey
8 quoted lines
--- "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net> wrote: Michael didn't meet Able in Kleos, so clearly he had come down from his high place. Presumably he was able to return, unlike his brother servants/angels who went down to Skai. What's the difference? -Roy
Angels are by definition messengers of God, so it only makes sense that Michael can travel wherever he needs to do his duties. Able is special because he is human. According to Christian belief, we are God's special children and this whole setup is for our benefit, though we are unworthy of it. At least that's my understanding. I'm not sure I buy that in the "real world" but for the purpose of story that's the situation. I think. Don
Andy Robertson10 Dec 2005, 09:22as archived
↳ in reply to don doggett
don doggett writes:
3 quoted lines
According to Christian belief, we are God's special children and this whole setup is for our benefit, though we are unworthy of it.
I don't believe this is the case in any of Wolfe's fictional universes. Humans may be special, but so are the Neighbours. Everyone is special. I suspect the thing that bound the descended angels to Skai was probably the slaying of Ymir and the shedding of Ymir's blood.

An unofficial mirror of a public mailing list · about & removal requests · download the archive · before the list · original archive at urth.net