On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Daniel Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote:
Wow, thanks for the admirable willingness to publicly apologise for any part you may have had in it, Marc.
On a different but related note, is there a Wolfe scholar out there who could make a digest of the main outlines of the main arguments on this mega-behemoth of a list?
-DOJP
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote:
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: (urth) Personal attacks
To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net>
Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 8:02 AM
Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled
Babbiecorn... for this
very reason, Mo.
There is a thin but important line between passionate
discourse and
slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of
late.
Thanks you for raising the concern.
I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of
the other's ideas to criticism of the other's
intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think
whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in
order.
You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting
the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry.
_______________________________________________
I really don't try to make anything personal, if I am guilty I apologize. It is unfortunate though, the topics I care about tend to generate into these "deleted unread" categories for most :( I started the Hunter in the East/Fitzgerald one and then just stood back as the stones flew. Sorry.
_______________________________________________