Personal attacks

The Urth list — 8 messages, 5 voices, 22 Nov 2011
https://urth.darkrealm.vip/thread/urth/6120

Mo Holkar22 Nov 2011, 15:09
Hi all, Guys, some of you are currently making this list a really annoying place to hang out -- to the extent that I'm just deleting threads unread. It always seems to be observations about one another's distasteful modes of discourse that gets us to this point. I would really like that to be a banned topic, as it seems never to be helpful or informative, but invariably produces a trail of vitriol. Could you please just lay off each other? best wishes, Mo # ~ # ~ # WolfeWiki -- a wiki about Gene Wolfe http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/
Ryan Dunn22 Nov 2011, 15:47

↳ in reply to Mo Holkar

I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern. ...ryan
17 quoted lines
On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Mo Holkar <lists at ukg.co.uk> wrote: Hi all, Guys, some of you are currently making this list a really annoying place to hang out -- to the extent that I'm just deleting threads unread. It always seems to be observations about one another's distasteful modes of discourse that gets us to this point. I would really like that to be a banned topic, as it seems never to be helpful or informative, but invariably produces a trail of vitriol. Could you please just lay off each other? best wishes, Mo # ~ # ~ # WolfeWiki -- a wiki about Gene Wolfe http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/ _______________________________________________
Daniel Petersen22 Nov 2011, 15:59

↳ in reply to Ryan Dunn

chimes in with similar sentiment to the others raising concerns -DOJP
26 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Ryan Dunn <ryan at liftingfaces.com> wrote: I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern. ...ryan On Nov 22, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Mo Holkar <lists at ukg.co.uk> wrote:
Hi all, Guys, some of you are currently making this list a really annoying place to hang out -- to the extent that I'm just deleting threads unread. It always seems to be observations about one another's distasteful modes of discourse that gets us to this point. I would really like that to be a banned topic, as it seems never to be helpful or informative, but invariably produces a trail of vitriol. Could you please just lay off each other? best wishes, Mo # ~ # ~ # WolfeWiki -- a wiki about Gene Wolfe http://www.wolfewiki.com/pmwiki/ _______________________________________________
António Pedro Marques22 Nov 2011, 16:02

↳ in reply to Ryan Dunn

Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
5 quoted lines
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern.
I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of the other's ideas to criticism of the other's intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in order. You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry.
Marc Aramini22 Nov 2011, 16:35

↳ in reply to António Pedro Marques

20 quoted lines · 1–2 deep
--- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote: From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> Subject: Re: (urth) Personal attacks To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 8:02 AM Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern.
I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of the other's ideas to criticism of the other's intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in order. You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry. _______________________________________________
I really don't try to make anything personal, if I am guilty I apologize. It is unfortunate though, the topics I care about tend to generate into these "deleted unread" categories for most :( I started the Hunter in the East/Fitzgerald one and then just stood back as the stones flew. Sorry.
Daniel Petersen22 Nov 2011, 16:40

↳ in reply to Marc Aramini

Wow, thanks for the admirable willingness to publicly apologise for any part you may have had in it, Marc. On a different but related note, is there a Wolfe scholar out there who could make a digest of the main outlines of the main arguments on this mega-behemoth of a list? -DOJP
30 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote: --- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> Subject: Re: (urth) Personal attacks To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 8:02 AM Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern.
I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of the other's ideas to criticism of the other's intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in order. You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry. _______________________________________________
I really don't try to make anything personal, if I am guilty I apologize. It is unfortunate though, the topics I care about tend to generate into these "deleted unread" categories for most :( I started the Hunter in the East/Fitzgerald one and then just stood back as the stones flew. Sorry. _______________________________________________
António Pedro Marques22 Nov 2011, 16:45

↳ in reply to Marc Aramini

I don't think you have to apologise to anyone, Marc, I've never seen you write even a hint of a personal attack. It's true that some topics are livelier than others, but I don't think liveliness is the problem.
Ryan Dunn22 Nov 2011, 17:26

↳ in reply to Daniel Petersen

My suspicion is that America may have a balanced budget before there is a streamlined Urth compendium. I think the trusty old search-for-keyword, followed by minutes-and-minutes of wheat and chaff separation is here to stay. ...ryan
36 quoted lines · 1–3 deep
On Nov 22, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Daniel Petersen <danielottojackpetersen at gmail.com> wrote: Wow, thanks for the admirable willingness to publicly apologise for any part you may have had in it, Marc. On a different but related note, is there a Wolfe scholar out there who could make a digest of the main outlines of the main arguments on this mega-behemoth of a list? -DOJP On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Marc Aramini <marcaramini at yahoo.com> wrote: --- On Tue, 11/22/11, Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> wrote:
From: Ant?nio Pedro Marques <entonio at gmail.com> Subject: Re: (urth) Personal attacks To: "The Urth Mailing List" <urth at lists.urth.net> Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2011, 8:02 AM Ryan Dunn wrote (22-11-2011 15:47):
I have literally deleted over 100 emails entitled Babbiecorn... for this very reason, Mo. There is a thin but important line between passionate discourse and slanderous rhetoric, which is getting quite blurry of late. Thanks you for raising the concern.
I think it's quite clear when one goes from criticism of the other's ideas to criticism of the other's intelligence/education/motivations/persona. And I think whenever that line is crossed, moderation would be in order. You may have lost one or two interesting points by deleting the recent threads, but I don't think you need to worry. _______________________________________________
I really don't try to make anything personal, if I am guilty I apologize. It is unfortunate though, the topics I care about tend to generate into these "deleted unread" categories for most :( I started the Hunter in the East/Fitzgerald one and then just stood back as the stones flew. Sorry. _______________________________________________

Exported from an unofficial mirror of a public mailing list. Copyright in each message remains with the person who wrote it. Email addresses are obscured as `user at host`, the form the original archive published. This file was rebuilt from parsed fields rather than retained headers, so it is faithful in content but not byte-exact.